Free Will and Open Alternatives

Open access

Abstract

In her recent book Causation and Free Will, Carolina Sartorio develops a distinctive version of an actual-sequence account of free will, according to which, when agents choose and act freely, their freedom is exclusively grounded in, and supervenes on, the actual causal history of such choices or actions. Against this proposal, I argue for an alternative- possibilities account, according to which agents’ freedom is partly grounded in their ability to choose or act otherwise. Actual-sequence accounts of freedom (and moral responsibility) are motivated by a reflection on so-called Frankfurt cases. Instead, other cases, such as two pairs of examples originally designed by van Inwagen, threaten actual-sequence accounts, including Sartorio’s. On the basis of her (rather complex) view of causation, Sartorio contends, however, that the two members of each pair have different causal histories, so that her view is not undermined by those cases after all. I discuss these test cases further and defend my alternative-possibilities account of freedom.

Ayer, Alfred J. 1954. Freedom and necessity. In his Philosophical Essays. London: Macmillan.

Fischer, John M. 1994. The Metaphysics of Free Will. Oxford: Blackwell.

Fischer, John M. and Ravizza, Mark. 1998. Responsibility and Control: a theory of moral responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Frankfurt, Harry G. 1969. Alternate possibilities and moral responsibility. Journal of Philosophy 66: 829-839.

Frankfurt, Harry G. 1988. The Importance of What We Care About. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ginet, Carl. 2002. Reasons explanations of action: causalist versus noncausalist accounts. In The Oxford Handbook of Free Will, ed by R. Kane. New York: Oxford University Press.

Ginet, Carl. 2008. In defense of a non-causal account of reasons explanation. Journal of Ethics 12: 229-237.

Goetz, Stewart. 2009. Freedom, Teleology, and Evil. London: Continuum Press.

Hume, David. 1748/1975. An enquiry concerning human understanding, in his Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals, 3rd edition. Introduction and index by L.A. Selby-Bigge; revised text and notes by P.H. Nidditch. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Kane, Robert. 1996. The Significance of Free Will. New York: Oxford University Press.

McCann, Hugh. 1998. The Works of Agency: on human action, will and freedom. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.

Moore, George H. 1912. Ethics. London: Williamson and Norgate.

Moya, Carlos J. 2011. On the very idea of a robust alternative. Crítica 43: 3-26.

Moya, Carlos J. 2014. Doing one’s best, alternative possibilities, and blameworthiness. Crítica 46: 3-26.

Nagel, Thomas. 1979. Moral luck. In his Mortal Questions. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Sartorio, Carolina. 2016. Causation and Free Will. New York: Oxford University Press.

Van Inwagen, Peter. 1983. An Essay on Free Will. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Watson, Gary. 2004. Two faces of responsibility. In his Agency and Answerability. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Disputatio

International Journal of Philosophy

Journal Information

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 94 94 11
PDF Downloads 27 27 7