The Transition into Virtual Reality

Mark Silcox 1
  • 1 University of Central Oklahoma,


In “The Virtual and the Real,” David Chalmers argues that there is an epistemic and ontological parity between VR and ordinary reality. My argument here is that, whatever the plausibility of these claims, they provide no basis for supposing that there is a similar parity of value. Careful reflection upon certain aspects of the transition that individuals make from interacting with real-world, physical environments to interacting with VR provides a basis for thinking that, to the extent that there are good reasons to deny the reality of virtual objects, there are also reasons to place a correspondingly higher value upon the experience of interacting with a VR environment. Chalmers’ assumption to the contrary arises from a subtle misrepresentation of how the phenomenon of cognitive penetration works in the perception of virtual objects, and from an unwillingness to acknowledge how our attitudes toward virtual environments are conditioned by the values we adopt when engaged in gameplay.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Bruner, Jerome S.; and Goodman, Cecile C. 1947. Value and need as organizing factors in perception. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 42(1): 33–44.

  • Chalmers, David. 2017. The virtual and the real. Disputatio 9(46): 309–52.

  • Churchland, Paul M. 1988. Perceptual plasticity and theoretical neutrality: a reply to Jerry Fodor. Philosophy of Science 55(2): 167–87.

  • Cogburn, Jon; and Silcox, Mark. 2014. Against brain-in-a-vatism. Philosophy and Technology 27(4): 561–79.

  • Dreyfus, Hubert. 2003. Existential phenomenology and the brave new world of The Matrix. The Harvard Review of Philosophy 11(1): 18–31.

  • Hurka, Thomas. 2011. The Best Things in Life: A Guide to What Really Matters. NY: Oxford University Press.

  • Langan, Thomas. 2000. Surviving the Age of Virtual Reality. University of Missouri press.

  • Murray, Janet. 2017. Hamlet on the Holodeck: The Future of Narrative in Cyberspace Updated Edition. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.

  • Nozick, Robert. 1974. Anarchy, State and Utopia. NY: Basic Books.

  • Sartre, Jean-Paul. 1956. Being and Nothingness. Trans. Hazel E. Barnes. NY: Washington Square Press.

  • Suits, Bernard. 1967. Is life a game we are playing? Ethics 77: 3.

  • Suits, Bernard. 2014. The Grasshopper. Third edition. Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press, pp. 209–13.

  • Tavinor, Grant. 2017. Welcome to the achievement machine; or, How to value and enjoy pointless things. In Experience Machines: The Philosophy of Virtual Worlds, ed. Mark Silcox. London: Rowman and Littlefield International.

  • Zeimbekis, John. 2015. Seeing, visualizing, and believing. In The Cognitive Penetrability of Perception: New Philosophical Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 298–328.


Journal + Issues