The number of people applying for school based religious education leadership positions is scarce in most regions throughout Australia as well as other geographical regions. Drawing on the insights from key stakeholders associated with religious education leadership in schools this qualitative study aimed to identify factors which militated against sustaining school based religious education leadership. This paper reports on the findings emanating from the study and proceeds to outline practical solutions that may contribute to attracting and sustaining future generations of religious education leaders. The key factors impacting on the sustainability of religious education leaders include feelings of disconnection, excessive demands associated with the role and a lack of structural support. Practical recommendations are outlined to contribute to sustaining school based religious education leadership. The recommendations include a review of teacher appraisal processes, equity in terms of industrial conditions and the inclusion of middle leadership positions that support the leader.
Blahut, L., & Bezzina, M. (1998). The primary religious education coordinator: Role demands and job turnover in the diocese of Parramatta. Journal of Religious Education, 46(2), 2-7.
Bowers, B. (1989). Grounded theory. In B. Starter (Ed.). Paths to knowledge: Innovative research methods in nursing (pp. 33-59). USA: National League of Nursing.
Buchanan, M. T. (2006). Factors that impede curriculum change: A preliminary report. British Journal of Religious Education, 28(1), 51-64.
Buchanan, M. T. (2010). Managing curriculum change in religious education: An inside perspective from school leaders in religious education. Saarbr¸cken, Germany: Lambert Academic Publishing.
Buchanan, M. (2011). Faith Leadership: An Approach for educational leadership contexts. Journal of Catholic School Studies, 83(2), 44-51.
Buchanan, M. T. (2013). Learning for leadership in religious education in schools through continuing education. International Journal of Continuing Education and Lifelong Learning, 6(1), 119-135.
Buchanan, M. T. (2014). Religious education leadership and the 21st century: Overcoming disconnectedness. eJournal of Catholic Education in Australasia 1(1) Article 5. Retrieved from http://researchonline.nd.edu.au/ecea/vol1/iss1/5
Buchanan, M. T., & Chapman, J. (2014). Learning for leadership: An evidence base for leadership learning in faith based schools. In Judith Chapman; Sue Mc Namara; MReiss; Y Waghid (Eds.). The international handbook for learning, teaching and leading in faith based schools (pp. 675-686). Netherlands: Springer Press.
Catholic Education Melbourne (2017). About us: Our vision is for an outstanding Catholic education that equips our young people with the knowledge, skills, hope and optimism to live meaningful lives and shape and enrich the world around them. Retrieved from https://www.cem.edu.au/About-Us.aspx
Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (1994). Personal experience methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Ed.). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Coll, R. (2009). Catholic school leadership: exploring its impact on the faith development of probationer teachers in Scotland. International Studies in Catholic Education, 1(2), 200-213. DOI: 10.1080/19422530903138184
Congregation for Catholic Education. (1990). The religious dimension of education in a Catholic school. Australia, Homebush: St Paul’s.
Crotty, L. (1998). The religious education coordinator: Evolution and evolving agendas. Journal of Religious Education, 42(2), 8-14.
Crotty, L. (2005). The REC and religious leadership. Journal of Religious Education, 53(1), 48-59.
Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. NSW, Australia: Allen Urwin.
Dick, B. (2007). What can grounded theorists and action researchers learn from each other? In A. Bryant and K. Charmaz (Eds.), The Sage handbook of grounded theory (pp. 370-388). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Dowling, E, (2012). An investment in our future: Reimagining professional learning for religious educators. Religious Education Journal of Australia, 28(1), 23-29.
Fleming, G. P. (2004). Religious education coordinators’ perceptions of the challenges in their role in Catholic schools. Journal of Religious Education, 52(2), 48-54.
Franzenburg, G. (2017). Learning from the past for the future: How to make adult education sustainable. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 8(2), 57-65. doi:
Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An Introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
Kvamme, O. A. (2017). The significance of context: Moral education and religious education facing the challenge of sustainability. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 8(2), 24-37. doi:
Liddy, S. (1998). Key issues for the REC. Journal of Religious Education, 42(2), 27.
Miedema, S. (2017). Pedagogy is coming back! Some hopeful signs for sustainable general education and worldview education. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 8(1), 121-128.
Miedema, S., & G.D. Bertram-Troost (2015). The challenges of global citizenship for worldview education. The perspective of social sustainability. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 17(2), 44-52.
Minichiello, V., Aroni, R., Timewell, E., & Alexander, L. (1995). In-depth interviewing: Principles, techniques, analysis (2nd ed.). Australia: Longman.
National Catholic Education Commission (2015). Annual Report. Canberra. National Catholic Education Commission. Retrieved from https://www.ncec.catholic.edu.au/resources/publications/460-2016-annual-report/file
Strauss. A., & Glaser, B. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Adeline.