Envisioning Complexity: Towards a New Conceptualization of Educational Research for Sustainability

Open access


This paper aims to present some conceptual insights into the research paradigm of complexity that deals with such problems like sustainability, education, and, more specifically – sustainability education. The transdisciplinary perspective and cognitive approaches of a hermeneutical cycle and semantic waves used in argumentation assist in grasping the essence of complexity and the main principles of complex dynamic systems. The comparison of simple, complicated and complex systems in a field of sustainability education provides an example of using complexity thinking with social systems. Then the complexity in an epistemological context, as the research paradigm, could be used for dealing with the challenging problems of sustainability, education and sustainability education from the point of view of post-normal science. The concept of transdisciplinarity has been developed as a research framework starting from the general approaches to its application for sustainability, education and sustainability education. The specific types of collaboration in educational research for sustainability and the modes of knowledge produced by transdisciplinary research in this field will be described, ending with reflections and suggestions for further analysis.

Barth, M., Godemann, J., Rieckmann, M., & Stoltenberg, U. (2007). Developing key competencies for sustainable development in higher education. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 8(4), 416–430.

Brandt, P., Ernst, A., Gralla, F., Luederitz, C., Lang, D. J., Reinert, J. N. B., Abson, D. J., & von Wehrden, H. (2013). A review of transdisciplinary research in sustainability science. Ecological Economics, 92, 1–15.

Bruner, J. (1960). The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Bunnin, N., & Yu, J. (2004) (Eds.). The Blackwell dictionary of Western philosophy. Blackwell Publishing.

Burns, A., & Knox, J. (2011). Classrooms as complex adaptive systems: A relational model. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 15(1), 1–25.

Camaren, P., & Swilling, M. (2014). Linking complexity and sustainability theories: Implications for modeling sustainability transitions. Sustainability, 6, 1594–1622.

Cammarota, J., & Fine, M. (Eds.) (2008). Revolutionizing education: Youth participatory action research in motion. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

Candlin, C. N., & Y. Maley (1997). Intertextuality and interdiscursivity in the discourse of alternative dispute resolution. In B.-L. Gunnarsson et al. (Eds.), The construction of professional discourse (pp. 201–222). London, Longman.

Checkland, P. (1991). Systems thinking: Systems practice. Chichester, Wiley.

Conklin, J. (2005). Dialogue mapping: Building shared understanding of wicked problems. Chichester: J.W. Wiley & Sons.

Corcoran, P. B., Walker, K. E., & Wals, A. E. J. (2004). Case studies, makeyourcase studies, and case stories: A critique of case-study methodology in sustainability in higher education. Environmental Education Research, 10(1), 7–21.

Corney, G. (2006). Education for sustainable development: An empirical study of the tensions and challenges faced by geography student teachers. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 15(3), 224–240.

Cronin, K. (2008). Transdisciplinary research (TDR) and sustainability. Overview report prepared for the Ministry of Research, Science and Technology (MoRST).

Dann, Z., & Barclay, I. (2006). Complexity Theory and knowledge management application. The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(1), 11–20.

Davis, B. (2008). Complexity and education: Vital simultaneities. In M. Mason (Ed.), Complexity Theory and the philosophy of education (pp. 46–61). Wiley-Blackwell.

Davis, B., & Sumara, D. (2006). Complexity and education: Inquiries into learning, teaching, and research. Routledge.

Davis, B., & Sumara, D. (2008). Complexity as a theory of education. Transnational Curriculum Inquiry, 5(2). Retrieved from: http://nitinat.library.ubc.ca/ojs/index.php/tci

Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis, MN: The University of Minnesota Press.

Diamond, J. (2005). Collapse: How societies choose to fail or succeed. New York: Viking Books.

Doll, W. E. Jr., Fleener, M. J., Trueit, D., & Julien, J. St. (2006) (Eds.). Chaos, complexity, curriculum, and culture: A conversation (Complicated conversation). Peter Lang Inc., International Academic Publishers.

Espinosa, A., & Walker, J. (2011). A complexity approach to sustainability: Theory and application (Series on Complexity Science). World Scientific Publishing Company.

Fleener, M. J. (2016). Re-searching methods in educational research: A transdisciplinary approach. In M. Koopmans & D. Stamovlasis (Eds.), Complex dynamic systems in education: Concepts, methods and applications (pp. 9–21). Springer.

Funtowicz, S., & Ravetz, J. (1993). Science for the post-normal age. Futures, 25(7), 739–755.

Garnett, P. W. (1997). Chaos theory tamed. Joseph Henry Press.

Gayford, C. (2003). Participatory methods and reflective practice applied to research in education for sustainability. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 8(1), 129–143.

Gedžūne, I., & Gedžūne, G. (2011). Exploring and promoting ecological consciousness in teacher education: The possibilities of Educational Action Research in education for sustainable development. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 13(1), 43–61.

Gershenson, C. (2013). The implications of interactions for science and philosophy. Foundations of Science, 18(4), 781–790.

Glouberman, S., & Zimmerman, B. (2002). Complicated and complex systems: What would successful reform of medicare look like? Discussion paper No 8. Commission on the Future of Health Care in Canada.

Gray, B. (2008). Enhancing transdisciplinary research through collaborative leadership. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35(2 Suppl), 124–132.

Guillaume, J. H. A. (2014). Managing uncertainty in modelling of wicked problems: Theory and application to Sustainable Aquifer Yield. Doctoral dissertation. Australian National University.

Hadorn, G. H. et al. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of transdisciplinary research. Springer.

Harris, G. (2007). Seeking sustainability in an age of complexity. Cambridge University Press.

Heylighen, F. (2008). Complexity and self-organization. In M. J. Bates & M. N. Maack (Eds.), Encyclopedia of library and information sciences, vol. 2 (pp. 1215–1224). Oxford: Taylor and Francis.

Higgs, A. L., & McMillan, V. M. (2006). Teaching through modeling: Four schools’ experiences in sustainability education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 38(1), 39–53.

Holland, J. H. (1998). Emergence: From chaos to order. Oxford University Press.

Holman, P. (2010). Engaging emergence: Turning upheaval into opportunity. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Holmberg, J., Svanström, M., Peet, D.-J., Mulder, K., Ferrer-Balas, D., & Segalàs, J. (2008). Embedding sustainability in higher education through interaction with lecturers: Case studies from three European technical universities. European Journal of Engineering Education, 33(3), 271–282.

Horn, J. (2008). Human research and complexity theory. In M. Mason (Ed.), Complexity Theory and the philosophy of education (pp. 124–136). Wiley-Blackwell.

Huckle, J. (1996). Introduction to the 2014 e-book edition. In S. Sterling & J. Huckle (Eds.). Education for sustainability. Routledge.

Huckle, J., & Sterling, S. (Eds.) (1996). Education for sustainability. London: Earthscan.

Hursh, D. (2005). Neo-liberalism, markets and accountability: Transforming education and undermining democracy in the United States and England. Policy Futures in Education, 3, 3–15.

Johnson, N. F. (2009). Simply complexity: A clear guide to complexity theory. Oneworld Publications.

Kemmis, S. (2006). Participatory action research and the public sphere. Educational Action Research, 14(4), 459–476.

Kline, S. J. (1995). Conceptual foundations for multidisciplinary thinking. Stanford University Press.

Knight, G. R. (2008). Issues and alternatives in educational philosophy. Andrews University Press.

Kopnina, H. (2013). Evaluating education for sustainable development (ESD): using Ecocentric and Anthropocentric Attitudes toward the Sustainable Development (EAATSD) scale. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 15(3), 607–623.

Kopnina, H., & Meijers, F. (2014). Education for sustainable development (ESD): Exploring theoretical and practical challenges. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 15(2), 188–207.

Kuhn, L. (2008). Complexity and educational research: A critical reflection. In M. Mason (Ed.), Complexity Theory and the philosophy of education (pp. 169–180). Wiley-Blackwell.

Kyburz-Graber, R. (2004). Does case-study methodology lack rigour? The need for quality criteria for sound case-study research, as illustrated by a recent case in secondary and higher education. Environmental Education Research, 10(1), 53–65.

Lawrence, R. J., & Despres, C. (2004). Futures of transdisciplinarity. Futures, 36(4), 397–405.

Leavy, P. (2011). Essentials of transdisciplinary research: Using Problem-centred methodologies. Left Coast Press, Inc.

Lemke, J. L., & Sabelli, N. H. (2008). Complex systems and educational change: Towards a new research agenda. In M. Mason (Ed.), Complexity Theory and the philosophy of education (pp. 112–123). Wiley-Blackwell.

Lim, S.-S. (2016). Towards consilience in science of learning: Data as currency for collaboration. Npj Science of Learning, 1, 16009.

Logan, R. K., & Schumann, J. H. (2005). The symbolosphere, conceptualization, language, and neo-dualism. Semiotica, 155(1–4), 201–214.

Mantzavinos, C. (2016). Hermeneutics. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved from: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2016/entries/hermeneutics

Mason, M. (2008). Complexity Theory and the philosophy of education. Wiley-Blackwell.

Maton, K. (2014). Building powerful knowledge: The significance of semantic waves. In B. Barrett & E. Rata (Eds.), Knowledge and the future of the curriculum: International studies in social realism (pp. 181–197). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

McGregor, S. L. T. (2004). The nature of transdisciplinary research and practice. Kappa Omicron Nu Human Sciences Working Paper Series [online]. Retrieved from: http://www.kappaomicronnu.com/hswp/archive/transdiscipl.pdf

McNamara, K. H. (2010). Fostering sustainability in higher education: A mixed-methods study of transformative leadership and change strategies. Environmental Practice, 12(1), 48–58.

McTaggart, R. (1997). Participatory action research: International contexts and consequences. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Morrison, K. (2008). Educational philosophy and the challenge of complexity theory. In M. Mason (Ed.), Complexity Theory and the philosophy of education (pp. 16–31). Wiley-Blackwell.

Newell, C. (2008). The class as a learning entity (complex adaptive system): An idea from complexity science and educational research. SFU Educational Review, 2(1), 5–17.

Norberg, J., & Cumming, G. S. (2008). Complexity theory for a sustainable future. Columbia University Press.

Osberg, D., & Biesta, G. (2010). (Eds.). Complexity theory and the politics of education. Sense Publishers.

Peterson, H. C. (2014). Sustainability: A wicked problem. In E. Kebreab (Ed.), Sustainable animal agriculture (pp. 1–9). CABI.

Pipere, A. (2016). (Cerams) saprotami par komplicētību [(Hopefully) comprehensibly about the complexity]. In K. Mārtinsone, A. Pipere, & D. Kamerāde (Eds.). Pētniecība: Teorija un prakse [Research: Theory and practice]. Rīga: RaKa. In Press.

Pipere, A., Reunamo, J., & Jones, M. (2010). Perceptions of research in education for sustainable development: An international perspective. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 1, 5–24.

Pipere, A., Veisson, M., & Salīte, I. (2015). Developing research in teacher education for sustainability: UN DESD via the Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 17(2), 5–43.

Poli, R. (2013). A note on the difference between complicated and complex social systems. Cadmus: Promoting leadership in thought that leads to action, 2(1), 142–147. Retrieved from: http://www.cadmusjournal.org/files/pdfreprints/vol2issue1/reprint-cj-v2-i1-complex-vs-complicated-systems-rpoli.pdf

Radford, M. (2006). Researching classrooms: Complexity and chaos. British Educational Research Journal, 32(2), 177–190.

Radford, M. (2008). Complexity and truth in educational research. In M. Mason (Ed.), Complexity Theory and the philosophy of education (pp. 137–149). Wiley-Blackwell.

Reigeluth, C. M. (2008). Chaos theory and the sciences of complexity: Foundations for transforming education. In B. Despres (Ed.), Systems thinkers in action: A field guide for effective change leadership in education. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.

Reunamo, J., & Pipere, A. (2011). Doing research on education for sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 12(2), 110–124.

Riccucci, N. M. (2008). The logic of inquiry in the field of public administration. In G. J. Miller & K. Yang (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in public administration (pp. 3–12). Taylor and Francis group, LLC.

Salīte, I. (2008). Educational Action Research for sustainability: Constructing a vision for the future in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 10, 5–16.

Sartori, G. (1984). Guidelines for concept analysis. In G. Sartori (Ed.), Social science concepts: A systematic analysis (pp. 15–85). London: Sage.

Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Eds.), Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp. 67–98). Chicago: Open Court.

Sommerville, M. A, & Rapport, D. J. (Eds.) (2002). Transdisciplinarity: Recreating integrated knowledge. McGill-Queens University Press, Montreal QC, Canada.

Stauffacher, M., Flüeler, T., Krütli, P., & Scholz, R. W. (2008). Analytic and dynamic approach to collaboration: A transdisciplinary case study on sustainable landscape development in a Swiss Prealpine Region. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 21(6), 409–422.

Stauffacher, M., Walter, A. I., Lang, D. J., Wiek, A., & Scholz, R. W. (2006). Learning to research environmental problems form a functional socio-cultural constructivism perspective: The transdisciplinary case study approach. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 7(3), 252–275.

Stephens, J. C., Hernandez, M. E., Romįn, M., Graham, A. C., & Scholz, R. W. (2008). Higher education as a change agent for sustainability in different cultures and contexts. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 9(3), 317–338.

Sterling, S. (2004). An analysis of the development of sustainability education internationally: Evolution, interpretation, and transformative potential. In J. Blewitt & C. Cullingford (Eds.), The sustainability curriculum: The challenge for higher education (pp. 43–62). London: Earthscan.

Stokols, D. (2006). Toward a science of transdisciplinary action research. American Journal of Community Psychology, 38(1), 63–77.

Swilling, M., & Annecke, E. (2011). Just transitions: Explorations of sustainability in an unfair world. Cape Town: Juta and Tokyo: United Nations University Press.

Šapkova, A. (2014). System of mathematics teachers’ beliefs about effective teaching/learning and practice as a complex adaptive system. Journal of Studies in Education, 4(3), 15–31.

Tainter, J. A. (2006). Social complexity and sustainability. Ecological complexity, 3(2), 91–103.

Tilbury, D. (2011). Higher education for sustainability: A global overview of commitment and progress. In GUNI (Ed.), Higher education in the world 4. Higher education’s commitment to sustainability: From understanding to action (pp. 18–28). GUNI: Barcelona.

Tillmanns, T., Holland, C., Lorenzi, F., & McDonagh, P. (2014). Interplay of rhizome and education for sustainable development. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 16(2), 5–17.

Toomey, A. H., Markusson, N., Adams, E., & Brockett, B. (2015). Inter- and transdisciplinary research: A critical perspective. Submitted to Global Sustainable Development Report Chapter 7 Policy Brief. Retrieved from: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/612558-Inter-%20and%20Trans-disciplinary%20Research%20-%20A%20Critical%20Perspective.pdf

UNESCO (2012). Guidelines for creating a National ESD Research Agenda and Plan. Education for Sustainable Development in Action Technical Paper No. 5 – 2012. Paris: UNESCO.

Valentinov, V. (2014). The complexity–sustainability trade-off in Niklas Luhmann’s Social Systems Theory. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 31, 14–22.

Von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General System Theory. New York: George Braziller.

Wiek, A. (2007). Challenges of transdisciplinary research as interactive knowledge generation – Experiences from transdisciplinary case study research. GAIA: Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 16(1), 52–57.

Young, C. (2016). Assuming an epistemology of emergence: Classrooms as complex adaptive systems. In Ş. Erçetin (Ed.). Chaos, complexity, and leadership (pp. 131–141). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

Young, K. (2000). What makes transdisciplinarity succeed or fail? Second report. In M. A. Somerville & D. J. Rapport (Eds.), Transdisciplinarity: Recreating integrated knowledge. EOLSS Publishers Ltd; Oxford, UK.

Wells, J. (2013). Complexity and sustainability. Routledge.

Wiesmann, U., Hirsch Hadorm, G., Hoffman-Riem, J., Biber-Klemm, S., Grossenbacker, W., Joye, D., Pohl, C., & Zemp, E. (2008). Enhancing transdisciplinary research: A synthesis in fifteen propositions. In G. Hirch Hadorn, H. Hoffman-Riem, S. Biber-Klemm, W. Grossenbacker-Mansuy, D. Joye, C. Pohl, U. Wiesmann, & E. Zemp (Eds.), Handbook of transdisciplinary research (pp. 433–441). Dordrecht: Springer.

Wilson, E. O. (1998). Consilience: The unity of knowledge. New York: Knopf.

Zheng, H. (2015). Teacher beliefs as a complex system: English language teachers in China (English Language Education, 4). Springer International Publishing.

Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education

The Journal of UNESCO Chair on the Interplay of Tradition and Innovation in Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) at Daugavpils University, Latvia

Journal Information

Cited By


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 235 232 21
PDF Downloads 125 123 12