Preliminary Ruling of the ECJ and the Akcenta Case

Open access

Abstract

The article analyses the significance of the ECJ preliminary ruling on competition law. Starting with the general characteristic of the preliminary ruling of the Court of Justice, its legal regulation in TFEU and its effects, it focuses on the concrete judgement of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 7 February 2013 in Case C-68/12 at the request of the Supreme Court of the Slovak Republic. It explains the preliminary questions and the background of the competition case that was the incentive for them. It describes the quite complicated cartel agreement of the three banks concerned and the impact of the ECJ preliminary ruling on the judgements/decisions of the case.

Bobek, M.,Komárek, J., Passer, J. M., Gillis, M. (2005). Předběžná otázka v komunitárním právu. Praha. LINDE Praha, a.s., p. 224–231.

Craig, P., de Búrca, G. (2003). EU Law: Text, cases and materials. (Third Edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Naômé, C. (2011). Prejudiciálna otázka v európskom práve. (1. vydanie). Bratislava. IURA Edition.

Steiner, J., Woods, L. (2009). EU Law. (Tenth Edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Šabová, Z. (2014). Výber z rozhodnutí slovenských súdov vo veciach ochrany hospodárskej súťaže. ANTITRUST, 1/2014, 36–37.

Šabová, Z. (2018). Výber z rozhodnutí slovenských súdov vo veciach ochrany hospodárskej súťaže. ANTITRUST, 2/2018, 61–62.

Šramelová, S. (2014). Rozhodnutia Protimonopolného úradu a súdny prieskum jeho rozhodnutí v roku 2013. ANTITRUST.

Journal Information


CiteScore 2017: 0.57

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.386
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.767

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 56 56 19
PDF Downloads 36 36 9