Environmental Sustainable Waste Management for a City Multi-Floor Manufacturing Cluster

Open access

Abstract

A multi-floor manufacturing in residential districts of huge city promotes decongestion of urban traffic and satisfy the population’s demand for essential goods. City manufacturing and its supply chain entail several challenges related to the sustainable development of a large agglomeration. Environmental problems impose significant constraints on such manufacturing activities and production waste in the urban environment poses a real problem that needs to be addressed by special research. This paper discusses integrated sustainable production waste management for a city multi-floor manufacturing cluster, consisting of a group of production buildings and a supporting logistics node. In line with the theory of integrated sustainable waste management, three key components are addressed: waste management stakeholders, components of the waste management system, and the technical, environmental and legal aspects of a city multi-floor manufacturing cluster. The goal of the paper is to develop a concept for a model of environmental sustainable waste management in a city multi-floor manufacturing cluster, aimed at ensuring the system safety: human - technical facility - environment. This model can serve as a basis for the development of appropriate logistics chains for production waste management considering their hazardousness indicator. The versatility of the model will allow it to be widely used, and when its stages and working principles are embedded in the practice of city multi-floor manufacturing, proper control over the waste management process can be achieved. The application of the proposed model of integrated sustainable production waste management in the practice of the city multi-floor manufacturing clusters will contribute to the environmental sustainability of its operation.

Anschutz, J., IJgosse, J., Scheinberg, A., 2004. Putting Integrated Sustainable Waste Management into Practice Using the ISWM Assessment Methodology: ISWM Methodology as Applied in the UWEP Plus Programme (2001–2003), WASTE: Gouda, The Netherlands.

Azapagic, A., Perdan, S., 2000. Indicators of sustainable development for industry: a general framework, Process Saf Environ Prot 78(4), 243–261.

Dzhuguryan T., 2012. Design Features of Flexible Manufacturing Modules in Frame Construction, Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Rzeszowskiej. Mechanika, Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Rzeszowskiej, z. 84[284], 1, 21-25.

Dzhuguryan T., Jóźwiak Z., 2016. Infrastructure for Multi-Floor Virtual Enterprises System, Systemy wspomagania w inżynierii produkcji, P.A. Nowa S.A. Gliwice, 3(15), 70-78.

Dzhuguryan, T., Jóźwiak, Z., 2017. Specific Approach to Assessment of Technologies for Multi-Floor Manufacturing System, Autobusy: technika, eksploatacja, systemy transportowe, nr 6, 1656-1659.

Dzhuguryan, T., Jóźwiak, Z., 2018. Specific Approach to Select of Freight Elevators for Multi-Floor Manufacturing, Autobusy: technika, eksploatacja, systemy transportowe, nr 12, 1059-1062.

Dzhuguryan, T., Jóźwiak, Z., Deja, A., Semenova, A., 2018. Infrastructure and Functions of a City Logistics Node for Multi-Floor Manufacturing Cluster, 8th International Scientific Conference CMDTUR 2018, Žilina, Slovakia, 34.

Dzhuguryan, T., Wiśnicki, B., Dudek, T., 2018. Concept of Intelligent Reconfigurable Trolleys for City Multi-Floor Manufacturing and Logistics System, 8th Carpathian Logistics Congress, Prague, Czech Republic.

Elsaid, S., Aghezzaf, E-H., 2015. A framework for sustainable waste management: challenges and opportunities, Manag Res Rev 38(10),1086–1097.

Fujita, M., Thisse, J.-F., 2002. Economics of Agglomeration: Cities, Industrial Localization, and Globalization, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Cambridge University Press.

Khorram Niaki, M., Nonino, F., 2017. Additive manufacturing management: a review and future research agenda. International Journal of Production Research, 55(5), 1419-1439.

Kluczek, A., 2016. Application of Multi-criteria Approach for Sustainability Assessment of Manufacturing Processes. Management and Production Engineering Review, 7(3), 62-78.

Kulczycka, J., Lelek, Ł., Lewandowska, A., Zarębska. J., 2015. Life Cycle Assessment of Municipal Solid Waste Management – Comparison of Results Using Different LCA Models. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 24, (1), 125-140.

Lithner, D., Larsson, A., Dave, G., 2011. Environmental and health hazard rating, and assessment of plastic polymers based on chemical composition, Sci. Total Environ. 409, 3309–3324.

Pires, A., Martinho, G., Chang, N-B., 2011. Solid waste management in European countries: a review of systems analysis techniques, J Environ Manag 92(4),1033–1050.

Rigamonti, L., Sterpi, I., Grosso, M., 2016. Integrated municipal waste management systems: An indicator to assess their environmental and economic sustainability, Ecol. Indic., 60, 1–7.

Sala, S., Ciuffo, B., Nijkamp, P., 2015. A systemic framework for sustainability assessment. Ecological Economics, 119, 314-325.

Sarkis, J., Zhu, Q., 2018. Environmental sustainability and production: taking the road less travelled, International Journal of Production Research, 56:1-2, 743-759.

Sikdar, SK., 2003. Sustainable development and sustainability metrics, AIChE J 49(8),1928–1932.

Wahlström, M., Laine-Ylijoki, J., Wik, O., Oberender, A., Hjelmar, O., 2016. Hazardous Waste Classification: Amendments to the European Waste Classification Regulation – What Do They Mean and What Are the Consequences? Nordic Council of Ministers.

Westkämper E., 2014. Towards the Re-Industrialization of Europe. A Concept for Manufacturing for 2030, Berlin: Springer, Germany.

Yoshida, H., Shimamura, K., Aizawa, H., 2007. 3R strategies for the establishment of an international sound material-cycle society, J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 9(2),101–111.

Zhao, Y., Wang, HT., Lu, WJ., 2009. Life-cycle assessment of the municipal solid waste management system, in Hangzhou, China (EASEWASTE). Waste Management Research, 27(4), 399–406.

Journal Information

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 74 74 16
PDF Downloads 51 51 12