The purpose of the present study was threefold. First, to explore whether a German version of the Creative Product Semantic Scale can be applied to novels, a hitherto poorly investigated creative product. Second, to determine which of the emerging attributes might affect the potential for success of a novel. Third, to check whether the novels judged are distinguishable in terms of their creative attributes. In an online study, participants judged four popular novels from recollection: Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone, The Hobbit, Twilight, and Inkheart. A factor analysis of items based on the Harry Potter subsample indicated four major dimensions: Resolution, Novelty, Style and Complexity. Among the dimensions, Resolution was the only dimension predicting potential for commercial success in a multiple regression. Novels were not distinguishable on the basis of the dimensions judged, indicating that the present CPSS did not have enough discriminatory power to detect differences among novels from the same genre. Additional measures indicated judgments had been relatively stable since the reading experience. Furthermore, a large proportion of participants was presumably biased in their memory, due to having watched the respective movie adaptation. This was suggested by a false memory check. Surprisingly however, there were no detectable differences in judgment between those who passed and those who failed the false memory check.
Agnoli, S., & Corazza, G. E. (2019). Emotions: The Spinal Cord of the Creative Thinking Process. In R. A. Beghetto & G. E. Corazza (Eds.), Dynamic Perspectives on Creativity (pp. 47-65). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Albrecht, R. (1977). Buch und Leser in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland [Book and reader in the Federal Republic of Germany] (Unpublished Doctoral thesis, Universität Bremen, Bremen, Germany).
Batey, M., & Furnham, A. (2006). Creativity, intelligence, and personality: A critical review of the scattered literature. Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monographs, 132, 355-429.
Beck, J. (2006). The sales effect of word of mouth: A model for creative goods and estimates for novels. Journal of Cultural Economics, 31, 5-23.
Besemer, S. P. (1998). Creative Product Analysis Matrix: Testing the model structure and a comparison among products - Three novel chairs. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 333–346. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1104
Besemer, S. P. (2000). To buy or not to buy: Predicting the willingness to buy from creative product variables. The International Journal of Creativity & Problem Solving, 10, 5-18.
Besemer, S. P., & O’Quin, K. (1999). Confirming the three-factor Creative Product Analysis Matrix Model in an American sample. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 287–296. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1204
Birney, D. P, Beckmann, J. F., & Seah, Y.-Z. (2016). More than the eye of the beholder: The interplay of person, task, and situation factors in evaluative judgements of creativity. Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 400-408. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.07.007
Clement, M., Proppe, D., & Sambeth, F. (2006). Der Einfluss von Meinungsführern auf den Erfolg von hedonischen Produkten [The impact of opinion leaders on the success of hedonic products]. Journal of Business Economics, 76, 797–824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-006-0038-4
Cropley, D., & Kaufman, J. C. (2012). Measuring functional creativity: Non-expert raters and the Creative Solution Diagnosis Scale. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(2), 119-137.
Cropley, D., & Cropley, A. (2005). Engineering creativity: A systems concept of functional creativity. In J. Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.), Faces of the muse: How people think, work and act creatively in diverse domains (pp. 169–185). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Das, J. P., Rath, R., & Das, R. S. (1955). Understanding versus suggestion in the judgement of literary passages. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 51, 624–628. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0049344
Diedrich, J., Benedek, M., Jauk, E., & Neubauer, A. C. (2015). Are creative ideas novel and useful? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9, 35–40. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038688
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2013). G*Power 3.1.7 Software. Retrieved from http://gpower.hhu.de/
Forgeard, M. J. C., Kaufman, S. B., & Kaufman, J. C. (2013). The psychology of creative writing. In G. Harper (Ed.), A companion to creative writing (pp. 320–333). New York, NY: Blackwell Publishing.
Form, S. (2018). Reaching wuthering heights with brave new words: The influence of originality of words on the success of paramount bestsellers. The Journal of Creative Behavior. ŁŁ, 0, pp. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.230
Form, S., Schlichting, K., & Kaernbach, C. (2017). Mentoring functions: Interpersonal tensions are associated with mentees’ creative achievement. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11, 440-450.
Funke, C. (2003). Tintenherz [Inkheart]. Hamburg, Germany: Cessilie Dressler.
Fürst, G., Ghisletta, P., & Lubart, T. (2017). An experimental study of the creative process in writing. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11, 202–215.
Hekkert, P., & Van Wieringen, P. C. W. (1996). Beauty in the eye of expert and nonexpert beholders: A study in the appraisal of art. The American Journal of Psychology, 10, 389-407.
Hohendahl, P. U. (1973). Promoter, Konsumenten und Kritiker: Zur Rezeption des Bestsellers [Promoters, consumers and critics: To the reception of the bestseller]. In J. Grimm, Reinhold; Hermand (Ed.), 4th Wisconsin Workshop (pp. 169–209). Madison, WI: Athenäum.
Horn, D., & Salvendy, G. (2006a). Consumer-based assessment of product creativity: A review and reappraisal. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, 16, 155-175.
Keuschnigg, M. (2012). Das Bestseller-Phänomen: Die Entstehung von Nachfragekonzentration im Buchmarkt [The bestseller phenomenon: The emergence of demand concentration in the book market]. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-93499-0_2
Lauterbach, B. R. (1979). Bestseller: Produktions- und Verkaufsstrategien [Bestseller: Production and sales strategies]. Tübingen: Tübinger Vereinigung für Volkskunde.
Martindale, C. (2007). Creativity, primordial cognition, and personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1777–1785.
Martindale, C., Brewer, W. F., Helson, R., Rosenberg, S., Simonton, D. K., Keeley, A., Leigh, J., & Ohtsuka, K. (1988). Structure, theme, style, and reader response in Hungarian and American short stories. In C. Martindale (Ed.), Psychological approaches to the study of literary narratives (pp. 267–289). Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.
Meyer, S. (2005). Twilight. New York, NY: Little, Brown.
Michael, W. B., Rosenthal, B. G., & De Camp, M. A. (1949). An experimental investigation of prestige-suggestion for two types of literary material. The Journal of Psychology, 28, 303–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1949.9916012
Nell, V. (1988). The psychology of reading for pleasure: Needs and gratifications. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 6–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/747903
O’Quin, K., & Besemer, S. P. (1989). The development, reliability, and validity of the revised Creative Product Semantic Scale. Creativity Research Journal, 2, 267–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400418909534323
Paton, E. (2012). “When the book takes over”: Creativity, the writing process and flow in Australian fiction writing. The International Journal of Creativity & Problem Solving, 22, 61–76.
Plucker, J. A., Kaufman, J. C., & Temple, J. S. (2009). Do experts and novices evaluate movies the same way? Psychology & Marketing, 26, 470–478.
Rietzschel, E., Nijstad, B. A., & Stroebe, W. (2010). The selection of creative ideas after individual idea generation: Choosing between creativity and impact. British Journal of Psychology, 101, 47–68. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712609X414204
Rollka, B. (1975). Vom Elend der Literaturkritik: Buchwerbung und Buchbesprechungen in der Welt am Sonntag [About the misery of literary criticism: book advertising and book reviews in the Welt am Sonntag]. Berlin: Volker Spiess.
Rowling, J. K. (1997). Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone. London, UK: Bloomsbury.
Runco, M. A., & Acar, S. (2012). Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 66–75.
Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 92–96.
Scherer, M. R. (1994). The influences of the relationship between primary and secondary process content on aesthetic success in novels. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 12, 159–172. https://doi.org/10.2190/D156-0C3R-F5KG-RBQE
Schmidt-Stölting, C., Blömeke, E., & Clement, M. (2011). Success drivers of fiction books: An empirical analysis of hardcover and paperback editions in Germany. Journal of Media Economics, 24, 24–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/08997764.2011.549428
Simonton, D. K. (1988). Aesthetic success in 36 Hungarian and American short stories. In C. Martindale (Ed.), Psychological approaches to the study of literary narratives (pp. 66–73). Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.
Simonton, D. K. (1990). Lexical choices and aesthetic success: A computer content analysis of 154 Shakespeare sonnets. Computers and the Humanities, 24, 251–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00123412
Simonton, D. K. (2012). Taking the U.S. patent office criteria seriously: A quantitative three-criterion creativity definition and its implications. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 97–106.