The aim of this study is to reveal relations between creativity in design and the cognitive developmental stages of designers within a Post-Piagetian approach. In this study design processes were deeply inspected with the aim of obtaining more comprehensive information about the effects of individual’s cognitive status on the design processes, problemsolving and quality of idea generation . In this field, studies done so far have been conducted on test results as indicators of creativity. Withinthe present study, however, protocol analyses were also evaluated, in addition to test results, and thanks to this addition, it was possible to determine the qualitative and quantitative effects of cognitive developmental stages on creativity. A total of twenty-five students voluntarily participated in the research. To collect data, two different methods were employed. The Social Paradigm Belief Inventory (SPBI), was employed to determine students' cognitive stages and scores, and the Think-aloud protocol was used to elicit verbal reports of the thought sequences of the students. In order to analyse the verbal reports reflecting designers' cognitive activities, the method of Linkography was conducted and the general statistics of segments were measured. To assess the relations between creativity in design and the cognitive developmental stages of the designers, SPBI scores and the general statistical values obtained from the design sessions were correlated. Findings showed that there is a strong and significant correlation between the cognitive development levels and creativity, in favour of dialectical thinking.
Akin, Ö. & Akin, C. (1996). Frames of reference in architectural design: Analysing the hyper- acclamation (Aha!). Design Studies, 17(4), 341-361.
Basseches, M. (1984). Dialectical thinking and adult development. Norwood, NJ: Ablex
Basseches, M. (1989). Dialectical thinking as an organized whole: Comments on Irwin and Kramer. In M. L. Commons, J. D. Sinnott, F. A. Richards, & C. Armon (Eds.), Adult development: Comparisons and applications of developmental models (pp. 161-178). New York: Praeger.
Blouin, P. S. & McKelvie, S. J. (2012). Postformal thinking as a predictor of creativity and of the identification and appreciation of irony and metaphor. North American Journal of Psychology, 14(1), 39-50.
Boden, M. A. (1994). What is creativity? In M. A. Boden (Ed.), Dimensions of creativity (pp. 75-117). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Commons, M. L, Bresette L. M., & Ross S. N. (2008). The connection between postformal thought and major scientific innovations, world futures. The Journal of Global Education, 64(5-7), 503-512.
Commons, M. L. & Richards F. A. (2003). Four Postformal Stages. In J. Demick and C. Andreoletti (Eds.), Handbook of Adult Development. The Springer Series in Adult Development and Aging, Book Section (pp. 199-219). US: Springer.
Cross, N. (1997). Descriptive models of creative design: Application to an example. Design Studies 18(4), 427-455.
Cross, N. (2008). Engineering design methods: Strategies for product design (4th ed.). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Gabora, L. (2002). Cognitive mechanisms underlying the creative process. In Proceedings of the 4th conference on Creativity & cognition (pp. 126-133). ACM.
Goldschmidt, G. (2014). Linkography: Unfolding the design process. MIT Press.
Goldschmidt, G. & Tatsa D. (2005). How good are good ideas? Correlates of design creativity. Design Studies, 26 (6), 593-611.
Gürsoy, B. (2010). The cognitive aspects of model-making in architectural design. (Unpublished MSc thesis). Turkey: Middle East Technical Unıversity.
Kramer, D. A. (1983). Post-formal operations? A need for further conceptualization. Human Development, 26, 91-105.
Kramer, D. A. (1989). Development of an awareness of contradiction across the life span and the question of postformal operations. In M. L. Commons, J. D. Sinnott, F. A. Richards, and C. Armon (Eds.), Adult development Comparisons and applications of developmental models. (pp. 133-159). New York: Praeger.
Kramer, D. A. (1992). The Social Paradigm Belief Inventory. 3 Choice- Forced Choice Version. [PDF document]. Retrieved from http://www.deirdrekramer.com/Dr._Deirdre_Kramer/The_Social_Paradigm_Belief_Inventory_files/Social%20Paradigm%20Belief%20Inventory%20--%20SPBI%20--%20Forced%20Version.pdf
Kramer, D. A., Kahlbaugh, P. E., & Goldston, R. B. (1992). A measure of paradigm beliefs about the social world. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences 47(3), 180-189.
Koestler, A. (1960). The Act of Creation. New York: Macmilla.
Labouvie-Vief, G. (1980). Beyond formal operations: Uses and limits of pure logic in lifespan development. Human Development, 23(3), 141-161.
Laske, O. (1999). An integrated model of developmental coaching. Consulting Psychology Journal, 51(3), 139-159.
Marchand, H. (2002). Some reflections on postformal stage. Behavioral Development Bulletin, 11(1), 39-46.
McBride, L. R. (1998). A comparison of postformal operations in diverse adult populations: Contrasting African-Americans and standard average European-Americans (working class). (Unpublished doctoral dissertation) Texas Tech University, US.
Mumford, M. D., Mobley, M. I., Uhlman, C. E., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Doares, L. M. (1991). Process analytic models of creative capacities. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 91-122.
Mwamwenda, T. (1993). Formal operations and academic achievement. The journal of psychology, 127(1), 99-103.
Perry, W. G. (1981). Cognitive and ethical growth: The making of meaning. In A. Chickering (Ed.), The modern American college (pp. 76-116). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Piaget, J. (1958). Growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. New York: Basic Books.
Pourmohamadi, M., & Gero, J. S. (2011). LINKOgrapher: an analysis tool to study design protocols based on FBS coding scheme. In DS 68-2: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 11), Impacting Society through Engineering Design, Vol. 2: Design Theory and Research Methodology, Lyngby/Copenhagen, Denmark, 15.-19.08. 2011.
Runco, M. A. (1994). Creativity and its discontents. In M. P. Shaw, and, M. A. Runco (Eds.). Creativity and affect (pp. 102-123). Westport, CT, US: Ablex Publishing.
Runco, M. A. (2004). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 657-687.
Santanen, E. L., Briggs, R. O., & de Devreede, G. J. (2002). Toward an understanding of creative solution generation. In System Sciences, 2002. HICSS. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on (pp. 2899-2908). IEEE.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
Sinnott, J. D. (1989). Everyday problem solving: Theory and application. New York: Praeger.
Someren, M., Barnard, Y., & Sandberg, J. (1994). The Think Aloud Method: A Practical Guide to Modelling Cognitive Processes. London: Academic Press.
Tatsa, D. (2005). Ideas in students' projects in the architectural studio: their sources, development, roles and assortment. (Unpublished MSc thesis), Technion, Israel.
Torrance, E. P. (1988). The nature of creativity as manifest in its testing. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 43-75). Cambridge: University Press.
Torrance, E. P., & Presbury, J. (1984). The criteria of success used in 242 recent experimental studies of creativity. Creative Child and Adult Quarterly, 9, 238-243.
Valanides, N. (1998), Formal operational performance and achievement of lower secondary school students. Studier in Educational Evaluation, 24(1), 1-23.
van der Lugt, R. (2003). Relating the quality of the idea generation process to the quality of the resulting design ideas. In DS 31: Proceedings of ICED 03, the 14th International Conference on Engineering Design, Stockholm.
Vanier, D. Searight, H.R. (2013). The Social Paradigm Belief Inventory (SPBI): A factor analytic study. Modern Behavioral Science, 1(1), 49-56.
Wallas, G. (1928). The art of thought. New York: Harcourt-Brace.
Ward, T.B., Smith, S.M. & Vaid, J. (1997). Conceptual structures and processes in creative thought. In T.B. Ward, S.M. Smith, and J. Vaid, (Eds.), Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes. (pp. 1-27) American Psychological Association.
Wu, P-L. & Chiou W-B. (2008). Postformal thinking and creativity among late adolescents: A post-Piagetian approach. Adolescence, 43(170), 237-251.
Yang, C-C., Wan, C-S. & Chiou, W-B. (2010). Dialectical thinking and creativity among young adults: A postformal operations perspective. Psychological Reports, 106(1), 1-14.