The impact of cluster networking on business performance of Croatian wood cluster members

Open access


This paper investigates the link between cluster membership and performance of clustered companies. The object of the study is the Croatian Wood Cluster (CWC). The paper presents the results of a survey of 34 members of the Croatian Wood Cluster operating in wood and furniture industries. The survey was conducted in order to identify and analyse perceptions and attitudes of CWC members towards CWC objectives, activities and performance; the cooperation strength among cluster members and that with the players outside the cluster; the effects of clustering on the operational performance of the clustered SMEs; business and economic setting in Croatia, barriers for the work of the CWC and the relevancy of government policy measures. The empirical results indicate that the economic performance of the clustered companies is significantly predicted by the cooperation with public institutions, financial institutions and professional associations (such as the Agency for Investments and Competitiveness) provided by the CWC and by the access to cluster resources such as horizontal cooperation, fairs, exhibitions etc. Additionally, an access to credit, customers and competitors shows a significant positive effect on finance-based performance of the clustered companies. On the other hand, cooperation among cluster members and cooperation with scientific, high education and research institutions show no significant relationship with the company performance.

1. Altenburg, T., Meyer-Stamer, J. (1999). How to Promote Clusters: Policy Experiences from Latin America. World Development, Vol. 27, No. 9, pp. 1693-1713.

2. Arrow, K. J. (1962). The economic implications of learning by doing. Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 155–172.

3. Baptista, R., Swann, G. M. P. (1998). Do firms in clusters innovate more?. Research Policy, Vol. 27, No. 5, pp. 525–540.

4. Bertolini, P., Giovannetti, E. (2006). Industrial districts and internationalization: the case of the agrifood industry in Modena, Italy. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 279-304.

5. Chiu, Y. T. (2009). How network competence and network location influence innovation performance. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 46-55.

6. Croatian Bureau of Statistics (2016). First release 4.2.1/12. Available at [26 August 2017].

7. Croatian Chamber of Economy (2016). O Zajednici klastera. Available at [26 August 2017].

8. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 297-334.

9. Crouch, C., Farrell, H. (2001). Great Britain: Falling through the Holes in the Network Concept?. In Local Production Systems in Europe: Rise or Demise?, Crouch C., Le Galès P., Trigilia C., Voelzkow H. (Eds.), Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 154-211.

10. Devereux, M. P., Griffith, R., Simpson, H. (2007). Firm location decisions, regional grants and agglomeration externalities. Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 91, No. 3, pp. 413-435.

11. Dragičević, M., Obadić, A. (2013). Klasteri i politike razvoja klastera. Ekonomski fakultet, Zagreb.

12. Ellison, G., Glaeser, E., Kerr, W. (2010). What Causes Industry Agglomeration? Evidence from Co-agglomeration Patterns. American Economic Review, Vol. 100, No. 3, pp. 1195-1213.

13. Eurostat (2014). Structural business statistics. Available at [23 August 2017].

14. Fujita, M., Thisse, J. F. (2002). Economics of Agglomeration: Cities, Industrial Location, and Regional Growth. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

15. Giuliani, E. (2005). Cluster absorptive capacity: Why do some clusters forge ahead and others lag behind. European Urban and Regional Studies, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 269-288.

16. Giuliani, E., Ravelotti, R., Pietrobello, C. (2005). Upgrading in Global Value Chains: Lessons from Latin American Clusters. World Development, Vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 549-573.

17. Hair, J. F., Tatham, R. L., Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. Person Prentice Hall.

18. Hendry, C., Brown, J. (2006). Dynamics of clustering and performance in the UK opto-electronics. Regional studies, Vol. 40, No. 7, pp. 707-725.

19. Hervas-Oliver, L. J., Albors-Garrigos, J. (2007). Do clusters capabilities matter; an empirical application of the resource based view in clusters. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 113-136.

20. Hrvatske šume (2017). Šume u Hrvatskoj. Available at [20 September 2017].

21. Hrvatski drvni klaster (2014). Godišnje izvješće za 2013. godinu. Hrvatski drvni klaster, Zagreb.

22. Isard, W. (1956). Location and Space-Economy. A General Theory Relating to Industrial Location, Market Areas, Land Use, Trade, and Urban Structure. The Technology Press of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and John Wiley & Sons, New York.

23. Johnson, A. R., Wichern W. D. (1992) Applied Multivariate Stastical Analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New York.

24. Kersan Škabić, I. (2014). Hrvatska drvna industrija – klasteri, konkurentnost i perspektive razvoja u okviru članstva u Europskoj Uniji. Poslovna izvrsnost, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 57-76.

25. Kersan-Škabić, I. Afrić Rakitovac, K. (Eds.) (2011) Klasteri i gospodarski potencijali Istarske županije, Sveučilište Jurja Dobrile u Puli, Odjel za ekonomiju i turizam “Dr. Mijo Mirković”, Pula.

26. Kesidou, E., Szirmai, A. (2012). External Knowledge and Innovation Performance in Clusters: Empirical Evidence from the Uruguay Software Cluster. Industry and Innovation, Vol. 19, No. 5, pp. 437-457.

27. Kim, B. Y., Oh, H. (2004). How do hotel firms obtain a competitive advantage? International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 65-71.

28. Krugman, P. R. (1991). Geography and Trade. MIT Press, Cambridge.

29. Lundvall, B. A., Johnson, B. (1994). The learning economy. Journal of Industry Studies, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 23-42.

30. Marshall, A. (1890). Principles of economics. Macmillan, London.

31. Marshall, A. (1920). Principles of Economics. Macmillan, London.

32. Morosini, P. (2004). Industrial Clusters, Knowledge Integration and Performance. World Development, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 305–326.

33. Morrison, A., Rabellotti, R., Zirulka, L. (2013). When do global pipelines enhance the diffusion of knowledge in clusters?. Economic Geography, Vol. 89, No. 1, pp. 77-96.

34. Morrison, F. D. (1987). Multivariate Statistical Methods. McGraw-Hill Book Co, New York.

35. Muscio, A. (2006). Patterns of Innovation in Industrial Districts: An Empirical Analysis. Industry & Innovation, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 291-312.

36. OECD (1999). Boosting innovation. The cluster approach. OECD, Paris.

37. Perroux, F. (1950). Economic space: theory and applications. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 64, No. 1, pp. 90-97.

38. Porter, M. E. (1998a). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, Vol. 76, No. 6, pp. 77-90.

39. Porter, M. E. (1998b). Location, Clusters, and the ‘New’ Micro Economics of competition. Business Economics, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 7-13.

40. Pyke, F., Sengenberger, W. (Eds.) (1992). Industrial districts and local economic regeneration. International Institute of Labor Studies, Geneva.

41. Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 94, No. 5, pp. 1002-1037.

42. Simmie, J., Sennett, J. (1999). Innovative clusters: global or local linkages? National Institute Economic Review, Vol. 170, No. 1, pp. 70-81.

Journal Information


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 271 271 9
PDF Downloads 83 83 6