After the November 2015 terror attacks in Paris, the French government reacted swiftly by declaring a state of emergency. This state of emergency remained in place for over two years before it was ended in November 2017, only after being replaced by the new anti-terror legislation. The attacks as well as the government’s reactions evoked parallels to 9/11 and its aftermath. This is a puzzling observation when taking into consideration that the Bush administration’s reactions have been criticized harshly and that the US ‘War on Terror’ (WoT) was initially considered a serious failure in France. We can assume that this adaption of the discourse and practices stems from a successful establishment of the WoT macro-securitization. By using Securitization Theory, we outline the development of this macro-securitization by comparing its current manifestation in France against the backdrop of its origins in the US after 9/11. We analysed securitizing moves in the discourses, as well as domestic and international emergency measure policies. We find extensive similarities with view of both; yet there are diff ering degrees of securitizing terrorism and the institutionalisation of the WoT in the two states. This suggests that the WoT narrative is still dominant internationally to frame the risk of terrorism as an existential threat, thus enabling repressive actions and the obstruction of a meaningful debate about the underlying problems causing terrorism in the first place.
Albert, M. and Buzan, B., 2011. Securitization, Sectors and Functional Diff erentiation. Security Dialogue, 42(4-5): 413–425.
Aradau, C. and Van Munster, R., 2009. Exceptionalism and the ‘War on Terror’: Criminology Meets International Relations. The British Journal of Criminology, 49(5): 686–701.
Balzacq, T., ed., 2011. Securitization Theory. How Security Problems Emerge and Dissolve. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon, New York: Routledge.
Bigo, D., 2002. Security and Immigration: Towards a Critique of the Government of Unease. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political. Special Issue: 63-92.
Bogain, A., 2017. Security in the name of human rights: the discursive legitimation strategies of the war on terror in France. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 10(3): 476-500.
Bright, J., 2012. Securitisation, terror, and control: towards a theory of the breaking point. Review of International Studies, 38: 861-879.
Bush, G.W., 2001a. Remarks in a Meeting with the National Security Team and an Exchange With Reporters at Camp David, Maryland, The American Presidency Project, [online]15 September. Available at: http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=63199 [accessed 01 September 2016].
Bush, G.W., 2001d. President Discusses War on Terrorism. Remarks in Address to the Nation. World Congress Center, Atlanta, Georgia, U.S. Department of State, [online]8 November. Available at: http://2001-2009.state.gov/s/ct/rls/rm/2001/5998.htm [accessed 01 September 2016].
Hollande, F., 2015c. Déclaration de M. le Président de la République. Congrès du Parlement XIVe legislature. Session ordinaire de 2015-2016, Assemblée Nationale, [online]16 November. Available at: www.assembleenationale.fr./14/cri/congress/20154001.asp [accessed 03 August 2016].
Huysmans, J., 2006. The Politics of Insecurity: Fear, Migration and Asylum in the EU. London, New York: Routledge.
Huysmans, J., 2011. What’s In An Act? On Security Speech Acts and Little Security Nothings. Security Dialogue, 42(4-5): 371–383.
Institut d’Études Opinion et Marketing en France et à l’International, 2016. Les Français et l’état d’urgence. Ifop pour Valeurs Actuelles, Institut d’Études Opinion et Marketing en France et à l’International, [online]. Available at: http://www.ifop.com/media/poll/3434-1-study_file.pdf [accessed 10 March 2017].
Jackson, R., 2005. Writing the War on Terrorism. Language, Politics and Counter-Terrorism. Manchester, New York: Palgrave Macmillian.
Jackson, R., 2013. Bush, Obama, Bush, Obama, Bush, Obama …: the War on Terror as social structure. In: Bentley, M. and Hollande, J., eds. Obama’s Foreign Policy. Ending the War on Terror. London: Routledge.
Léonard, S. and Kaunert, C., 2011. Reconceptualizing the Audience in Securitization Theory. In: Bazlacq, T., ed. Securitization Theory. How Security Problems Emerge and Dissolve. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon, New York: Routledge. pp. 57-76.
Lequesne, C., 2016. French foreign and security challenges after the Paris terrorist attacks. Contemporary Security Policy, 37(2): 306-318.
Salter, M.B., 2011. When Securitization Fails: The Hard Case of Counter-Terrorism Programs. In: Balzacq, T., ed. Securitization Theory. How Security Problems Emerge and Dissolve. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon, New York: Routledge. pp: 116-132.
Stritzel, H., 2011. Security, the Translation. Security Dialogue, 42(4-5): 343–355.
Van Rythoven, E., 2016. The Perils of Realist Advocacy and the Promise of Securitization Theory: Revisiting the Tragedy of the Iraq War Debate. European Journal of International Relations, 22(3): 487–511.
Wæver, O., 1995. Securitization and Desecuritization. In: Lipschutz, R.D., ed. On Security. New York: Columbia University Press. Wæver, O., 1999. Securitizing Sectors? Reply to Eriksson. Cooperation and Conflict, 34(3): 334–340.
Watson, S., 2013. Macrosecuritization and the securitization dilemma in the Canadian Arctic. Critical Studies on Security, 1(3): 265-279.
Williams, M. C., 2011. The Continuing Evolution of Securitization Theory. In: Balzacq, T., ed., Securitization Theory. How Security Problems Emerge and Dissolve. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon, New York: Routledge.