Reconciling after Transitional Justice: When Prosecutions are not Enough, the Case of Bosnia and Herzegovina

Open access


The concept and study of transitional justice has grown exponentially over the last decades. Since the Nuremberg and Tokyo trials after the end of the Second World War, there have been a number of attempts made across the globe to achieve justice for human rights violations (International Peace Institute 2013: 10). How these attempts at achieving justice impact whether or not societies reconcile, continues to be one of the key discussions taking place in a transitional justice discourse. One particular context where this debate continues to rage on is in Bosnia and Herzegovina, many scholars argue that the transitional justice process and mechanism employed in Bosnia and Herzegovina have not fostered inter-group reconciliation, but in fact caused more divisions. To this end, this article explores the context of transitional justice in Bosnia and Herzegovina from a unique perspective that focuses on the need for reconciliation and healing after transitional justice processes like war crime prosecutions. This article explores why the prosecuting of war criminals has not fostered reconciliation in Bosnia and Herzegovina and how the processes have divided Bosnian society further. Additionally, this article presents the idea of state-sponsored dialog sessions as a way of dealing with the past and moving beyond the divisions of retributive justice.

Auerbach, Y. 2009. The Reconciliation Pyramid-A Narrative-Based Framework for Analyzing Identity Conflicts. Political Psychology, 30(2), 291-318.

Ahmetašević, N. 2015, November 4. Bosnia’s Unending War. Retrieved from

Bell, J. 2015. Understanding Transitional Justice and its Two Major Dilemmas. Journal of Interdisciplinary Conflict Science, 1(2).

Bell, J. O. 2018a. The Bosnian War Crimes Justice Strategy a Decade Later (Issue brief No. 92). Torkel Opsahl Academic EPublisher.

Bell, J. O. 2018b. Frozen justice: Lessons from Bosnia and Herzegovinas failed transitional justice strategy. Wilmington: Vernon Press.

Bloomfield, D., Barnes, T., & Huyse, L. 2003. Reconciliation after violent conflict: A handbook. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.

Clark, P. 2010. The Gacaca courts, post-genocide justice and reconciliation in Rwanda: Justice without lawyers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Clark, J. N. 2008. The three Rs: Retributive justice, restorative justice, and reconciliation. Contemporary Justice Review, 11(4), 331-350. doi:10.1080/10282580802482603.

Clark, J. N. 2012, January 23. The ICTY and the Challenges of Reconciliation in the Former Yugoslavia. Retrieved from

Fischer, M. 2011. Transitional Justice and Reconciliation: Theory and Practice. In Advancing conflict transformation: The Berghof handbook II. Michigan: Barbara Budrich.

Foden, G. 2018, August 06. Center for Nonviolent Action: Fighting a War of Memories. Retrieved from

Haider, H. 2016. Transitional Justice: Topic guide. Birmingham, UK: GSDRC, University of Birmingham.

International Peace Institute. 2013. Peace, justice, and reconciliation in Africa: Opportunities and challenges in the fight against impunity. International Peace Institute.

Kostić, R. 2012. Transitional justice and reconciliation in Bosnia-Herzegovina: Whose memories, whose justice? Sociologija, 54(4), 649-666. doi:10.2298/SOC1204649K.

Kriesberg, L. 2007. Reconciliation:Aspects, Growth, and Sequences. International Journal of Peace Studies, 12(1).

Lederach, J. P. 1997. Building peace: Sustainable reconciliation in divided societies. Washington, D.C.: United States Institute of Peace Press.

Mackić, E. 2018, September 3. Ratko Mladic Monument Erected in His Bosnian Hometown. Retrieved March 5, 2018, from

Malek, C. 2013, May. Reconciliation. Retrieved from

Maiese, M. G. 2003, July. Types of justice. Retrieved from

Mallinder, L. 2013. Bosnia-Herzegovina. In L. Stan & N. Nedelsky (Eds.), Encyclopedia of transitional justice (pp. 60-67).Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

McMorran, C. 2003, July 12. International War Crimes Tribunals. Retrieved from

Mobekk, E. 2005. Transitional justice in post-conflict societies: Approaches to reconciliation. In A. Ebnöther & P. Fluri (Eds.), After intervention: Public security management in post-conflict societies: From intervention to sustainable local ownership (pp. 261-292). Geneva: Geneva Centre for Democratic Control of Armed Forces.

Nadler, A., & Shnabel, N. 2015. Intergroup reconciliation: Instrumental and socio-emotional processes and the needs-based model. European Review of Social Psychology, 26(1), 93-125. doi:10.1080/10463283.2015.1106712.

Post, B. W. 2009. COMMUNITY BASED PEACE PROGRAMS FOR ARMED CONFLICT RESOLUTION: A Guide to Program Development Using Current Peace Programs’ Best Practices. Psyke & Logos, 30, 84-102.

Pruitt, D. G., & Kim, S. H. 2004. Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement. Boston: McGraw-Hill.

Rigby, A. 2001. Justice and reconciliation: After the violence. Boulder, United States: Lynne Rienner.

Rudić, F. 2019, February 22. Bosnian Serb War Commissions ‘Seeking to Revise Truth’: Academics. Retrieved from

Seils, P. 2017, June 30. The Place of Reconciliation in Transitional Justice. Retrieved from

Skaar, E. 2013. Reconciliation in a Transitional Justice Perspective. Transitional Justice Review, 1(1), 1-51. doi:10.5206/tjr.2012.1.1.4

Stover, E., & Weinstein, H. M. 2004. My neighbor, my enemy: Justice and community in the aftermath of mass atrocity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

TheSrpskaTimes.2018, August 16. Srpska Parliament rejected the Srebrenica Commission Report from 2004. Retrieved from

Turton, S. 2017, July 21. Bosnian War rape survivors speak of their suffering 25 years on. Retrieved March 6, 2018, from

United Nations Development Program. 2009. Why dialogue matters for conflict prevention and peacebuilding (Publication). United Nations Development Programme.

United Nations International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. 2017a. About the ICTY. Retrieved from

United Nations International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. 2017b. Infographic: ICTY Facts & Figures. Retrieved from

Vukosavljevic, N., 2007. ‘Training for Peacebuilding and Conflict Transformation. Experiences of the ‘Centre for Nonviolent Action’ in the Western Balkans’, Berghof Research Center for Constructive Conflict Management, Berlin.

Zyberi, G., & Černič, J. L. 2015. Transitional Justice Processes and Reconciliation in the Former Yugoslavia: Challenges and Prospects. Nordic Journal of Human Rights, 33(2), 132-157. doi:10.1080/18918131.2015.1047615.

Croatian International Relations Review

The Journal of Institute for International Relations

Journal Information

CiteScore 2018: 0.31

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.114
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.418


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 85 85 24
PDF Downloads 58 58 18