The concept and study of transitional justice has grown exponentially over the last decades. Since the Nuremberg and Tokyo trials after the end of the Second World War, there have been a number of attempts made across the globe to achieve justice for human rights violations (International Peace Institute 2013: 10). How these attempts at achieving justice impact whether or not societies reconcile, continues to be one of the key discussions taking place in a transitional justice discourse. One particular context where this debate continues to rage on is in Bosnia and Herzegovina, many scholars argue that the transitional justice process and mechanism employed in Bosnia and Herzegovina have not fostered inter-group reconciliation, but in fact caused more divisions. To this end, this article explores the context of transitional justice in Bosnia and Herzegovina from a unique perspective that focuses on the need for reconciliation and healing after transitional justice processes like war crime prosecutions. This article explores why the prosecuting of war criminals has not fostered reconciliation in Bosnia and Herzegovina and how the processes have divided Bosnian society further. Additionally, this article presents the idea of state-sponsored dialog sessions as a way of dealing with the past and moving beyond the divisions of retributive justice.
Mobekk, E. 2005. Transitional justice in post-conflict societies: Approaches to reconciliation. In A. Ebnöther & P. Fluri (Eds.), After intervention: Public security management in post-conflict societies: From intervention to sustainable local ownership (pp. 261-292). Geneva: Geneva Centre for Democratic Control of Armed Forces.
Nadler, A., & Shnabel, N. 2015. Intergroup reconciliation: Instrumental and socio-emotional processes and the needs-based model. European Review of Social Psychology, 26(1), 93-125. doi:10.1080/10463283.2015.1106712.
Post, B. W. 2009. COMMUNITY BASED PEACE PROGRAMS FOR ARMED CONFLICT RESOLUTION: A Guide to Program Development Using Current Peace Programs’ Best Practices. Psyke & Logos, 30, 84-102.
Pruitt, D. G., & Kim, S. H. 2004. Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Rigby, A. 2001. Justice and reconciliation: After the violence. Boulder, United States: Lynne Rienner.
Vukosavljevic, N., 2007. ‘Training for Peacebuilding and Conflict Transformation. Experiences of the ‘Centre for Nonviolent Action’ in the Western Balkans’, Berghof Research Center for Constructive Conflict Management, Berlin.
Zyberi, G., & Černič, J. L. 2015. Transitional Justice Processes and Reconciliation in the Former Yugoslavia: Challenges and Prospects. Nordic Journal of Human Rights, 33(2), 132-157. doi:10.1080/18918131.2015.1047615.