The Effects of Post-conflict Constitutional Designs: the “Ohrid Framework Agreement” and the Macedonian Constitution

Open access

Abstract

In regions troubled by ethnic based conflict violence often erupts abruptly and severely. Peacemakers, then, follow unconditional paths to prevent conflict escalation. The article analyzes the ways in which post-conflict constitutional designs shape the state structure through constitutional amendments. Peace agreements as bases for constitutional reform, the article claims, have reformatory but also obstructive implications. Seeing the Ohrid Framework Agreement as a case study, the paper analyzes its implications on the development of the political system in Macedonia. On one side OFA serves as a criterion for the Macedonian Euro-Atlantic integration and a driving force for the creation of a functioning multicultural society. On the other side, the procedural and substantive flaws of the agreement undermine its absorbability in the society. In procedural sense, OFA hindered its own implementation through the used terminology and the drafting process. In substantial sense, agreement’s goals and provisions reached beyond the purpose of peace agreements and underestimated the complexity of the conflicting issues at stake.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Ahrens G. H. 2007 Diplomacy on the Edge: Containment of Ethnic Conflict and the Minorities Working Group of the Conferences on Yugoslavia. Washington D.C.: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.

  • Beardsley K. 2011. The mediation dilemma. Ithaca N.Y.: Cornell University Press.

  • Bieber F. ed. 2008. Power-Sharing and the Implementation of the Ohrid Framework Agreement. Skopje: Friedrich Ebert Shtiftung Office in Skopje.

  • Constitution of the Republic of Macedonia Number 08-4642/1 17 November 1991 at http://www.sobranie.mk/the-constitution-of-the-republic-of-macedonia.nspx [accessed 15 May 2017]

  • Crisis Group Europe Report N°212 2011 “Macedonia: Ten Years after the Conflict”. http://www.crisisgroup.org/en/regions/europe/balkans/macedonia/212-macedonia-ten-years-after-the-conflict.aspx [accessed 15 May 2017]

  • Crocker C. A Hampson F. Osler & Aall P. R ed. 2005. Grasping the nettle: analyzing cases of intractable conflict. Washington D.C.: United States Institute of Peace Press.

  • Czymmeck A. and Viciska K. 2011. A Model for Future Multi-Ethnic Coexistence? Macedonia 10 Years after the Ohrid Framework Agreement. KAS International Reports 11|2011.

  • Hopmann P. T. 1996. The negotiation process and the resolution of international conflicts. Columbia S.C.: University of South Carolina Press.

  • ICG Balkans Report 109 2001 “The Macedonian Question: Reform or Rebellion”.

  • Jović D. 2011. Bitka za etnički status u postjugoslovenskim drţavama. Političke analize br. 5.

  • Lijphart A. 2003. Modeli demokratije. Beograd i Podgorica: Sluzbeni list SiCG i CID.

  • Maleska M. 2005. What kind of a Political System did Macedonia get after the Ohrid Peace Agreement? New Balkan Politics No.9 – 2005 on http://newbalkanpolitics.org.mk/item/What-kind-of-a-political-system-did-Macedonia-get-after-the-Ohrid-Peace-Agreement#.WYl0v1UjHIU [accessed 8 August 2017]

  • Norris P. 2005. Stable democracy and good governance in divided societies: Do power-sharing institutions work? KSG Working Paper No. RWP05-014 on http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.722626 [accessed 7 February 2018]

  • Ohrid Framework Agreement 2001 http://www.ucd.ie/ibis/filestore/Ohrid%20Framework%20Agreement.pdf.

  • Phillips J. 2002. Macedonia: Warlords and Rebels in the Balkans. London: I.B. Tauris.

  • Samuels K. and Hawkins Wyeth V. 2006. State-building and Constitutional Design after Conflict International Peace Academy New York on https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/126785/state_building_consti_design_08_2006.pdf [accessed 7 February 2018]

  • Skaric S. 2004 “Ohrid Agreement and Minority Communities in Macedonia” In: Stanovcic V Basic G. Prospects of Multiculturality in Western Balkan States. Ethnicity Research Center. Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.

  • Skaric S. Siljanovska-Davkova G. 2009. Ustavno pravo (Constitutional law). Skopje: Kultura

  • The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia 2012 Progress Report 2012 European Commission Staff Working Document.

  • Vankovska B. The Role of the Ohrid Framework Agreement and the Peace Process in Macedonia on http://www.fzf.ukim.edu.mk/pdf/odb/vankovska/Vankovska,%20B.%20-%20The%20Role%20of%20the%20Ohrid%20Framework.%20Agreement%20and%20the%20Peace%20Process%20in%20Macedonia.pdf [accessed 15 May 2014]

  • Vasović V. 2003. Lajphartova konsociaciona demokratija. Preface to the book Modeli demokratije. Podgorica: CID.

  • Widner J. 2008. Constitution Writing in Post-conflict Settings: An Overview 49 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1513 on http://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr/vol49/iss4/16 [accessed 7 February 2018]

  • Yearly Report on the employed in the public sector 2017. Skopje: Ministry of information society and administration on http://mioa.gov.mk/files/pdf/dokumenti/Godisen_izvestaj_2016_Registar_na_vraboteni_vo_JS.pdf [accessed 13 August 2017]

  • Zartman I. W. 2008. Negotiation and conflict management: essays on theory and practice. London: Routledge.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


CiteScore 2018: 0.31

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.114
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.418

Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 329 233 4
PDF Downloads 178 131 3