A Comparison Of GDP Growth Of European Countries During 2008-2012 From The Regional And Other Perspectives / Porównanie Wzrostu Pkb W Okresie 2008-2012 W Krajach Europejskich Z Regionalnej I Innej Perspektywy

Open access

Abstract

The aim of the article is to compare the total real GDP growth of European countries from the 3rd quarter of 2008 with the 3rd quarter of 2012, the period characterized by a predominant economic stagnation or economic recession in the majority of examined European countries. The countries are divided into groups based on the following grounds: whether they are geographically close to the economic center (Germany) or peripheral, whether they are in the eurozone or not, whether they are (new) EU members or ‘old’ ones, etc. The main findings from the comparisons are as follows: 1. European countries close to the economic center (Germany and its neighbours) experienced, on average, positive economic growth during examined period, while countries from European periphery on average experienced negative economic growth during the same period. This difference was found statistically significant at the α = 0.01 level. 2. Differences between eurozone and non-eurozone, old and new EU members, and between more and less populated countries were found statistically insignificant. 3. European regions with the most negative real total GDP growth included the Baltics, the Balkans, Southern Europe (Italy, Portugal) and Iceland. The most successful countries with the most positive real total GDP growth were central European countries (Poland, Slovakia, Germany, Switzerland, Austria) and those in northern Europe (Sweden and Norway).

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Aiginger K. (2013) A new strategy for the European periphery WIFO Policy Paper no. 1.

  • Aiginger K. (2011) Why Performance Differed Across Countries in the Recent Crisis How Country Performance in the Recent Crisis Depended on Pre-crisis Conditions. WIFO Working Papers No. 387.

  • Beblavý M. Cobham D. Ódor L. (Eds.) (2011) EURO area and the financial crisis 2011. Cambridge University Press.

  • Garcia-Arias G. Fernandez-Huerga E. Salvador A. (2013) European Periphery Crises International Financial Markets and Democracy ʻAmerican Journal of Economics and Sociologyʼ Vol. 72 Issue 4.

  • Eichengreen B. (2009) The Crisis and the Euro ʻInternational Economy and Trade Working Paper 23ʼ.

  • Eurostat (2014). Available from: http://www.eurostat.eu.

  • Kajaks J. (2013) The economic and social situation in the Baltic countries: Latvia - Study. European Economic and Social Committee.

  • Karasavvoglou A. Polychronidou P. (Eds.). (2014) Economic Crisis in Europe and the Balkans: Problems and Prospects Springer.

  • Kattel R. Raudla R. (2013) The Baltic Republics and the Crisis of 2008 - 2011 ʻEurope-Asia Studiesʼ 65(3).

  • Knibbe M. (2011). Why Poland and Sweden escaped the crisis to an extent and some other Baltic states didn’t. Available from: http://rwer.wordpress.com/2011/10/25/why-poland-andsweden-escaped-the-crisis-to-an-extent-and-some-other-baltic-states-didnt/

  • Matei D. (2010) The Role of the Euro During and After Economical Crisis The Annals of “Dunarea de Jos” University of Galati Fascicle I - 2010. Years XVI - no 1.

  • Mazurek J. Mielcová E. (2013) The Evaluation of Economic Recession Magnitude: Introduction and Application. ʻPrague Economic Papersʼ vol. 2013(2).

  • Minchev O. (Ed.). (2010) The western Balkans: between the economics crisis and the European perspective. Institute for regional and international studies Sofia.

  • Pere E. Hashorva A. (2012) Western Balkan´s countries in focus of global economic crisis. ʻThe USV Annals of Economics and Public Administrationʼ Vol. 12 Issue 1(15).

  • Sobják A. (2013) From the Periphery to the Core? Central Europe and the Economic Crisis ʻPISM Policy Paperʼ no. 7 (55).

  • World Bank. (2013). Available from: http://www.worldbank.org.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


CiteScore 2018: 0.46

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.241
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.366

Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 173 98 1
PDF Downloads 86 62 2