Our paper explores how a rule prescribed by the European Union can bring about changes in the policy discourse of a member state. Drawing on the literatures of discursive institutionalism and Europeanization, the theoretical part discusses the factors that influence discursive shifts. The empirical part examines the discursive impacts of the introduction of the structural budget deficit rule, required by the Fiscal Compact, in Estonia and Latvia. It demonstrates how the discursive shifts have been shaped by the localized translations offered by civil servants, the entrance of additional actors to the policy-making arena, crisis experience, and the strategic interests of policy actors.
Barnett, M., and M. Finnemore. (2004). Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. Cornell University Press.
Béland, D., and R.H. Cox. eds. (2011). Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research. New York: Oxford University Press.
Blyth, M. (2002). Great Transformations. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Blyth, M. (2007). ‘Powering, Puzzling, or Persuading? The Mechanisms of Building Institutional Orders.’ International Studies Quarterly 51: 761–777.
Börzel, T. and T. Risse (2003). ‘Conceptualising the Domestic Impact of Europe.’ In K. Featherstone and C.M. Radaelli (eds.), The Politics of Europeanisation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 57–80.
Busch, A. (2004). ‘National Filters: Europeanisation, Institutions, and Discourse in the Case of Banking Regulation.’ West European Politics 27(2): 310-333.
Campbell, J.L. (2004). Institutional Change and Globalization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Campbell, J.L. (1998). ‘Institutional Analysis and the Role of Ideas in Political Economy.’ Theory and Society 27(3): 377-409.
Carstensen, M.B. (2011). ‘Paradigm Man vs. the Bricoleur: Bricolage as an Alternative Vision of Agency in Ideational Change.’ European Political Science Review 3(1): 147-167.
Cowles, M.G., J. Caporaso and T. Risse, eds. (2001). Europeanization and Domestic Change. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Crespy, A. and V. Schmidt (2014). ‘The Clash of Titans: France, Germany and the Discursive Double Game of EMU Reform.’ Journal of European Public Policy 21(8): 1085-1101.
Gutierrez, R.A. (2010). “When Experts Do Politics: Introducing Water Policy Reform in Brazil.” Governance 23(1): 59-88.
Ioannou, D., P. Leblond, and A. Niemann. (2015). ‘European Integration and the Crisis: Practice and Theory.’ Journal of European Public Policy 22(2): 155-176.
Irvine, J.A.S. (2011). ‘Canadian Refugee Policy: Understanding the role of international bureaucratic networks in domestic paradigm change.’ In G. Skogstad (ed), Policy Paradigms, Transnationalism, and Domestic Politics. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Kattel, R. and R. Raudla. (2013). ‘The Baltic States and the Crisis of 2008-2011.’ Europe-Asia Studies 65(3): 426-449.
Lynggaard, K. (2012). ‘Discursive Institutional Analytical Strategies.’ In C.M. Radaelli and T. Exadaktylos (eds) Research Design in European Studies. Palgrave Macmillan.
Lütz, S. and M. Kranke (2014). ‘The European Rescue of the Washington Consensus? EU and IMF lending to Central and Eastern European Countries.’ Review of International Political Economy 21(2): 310-338
Mourre, G., C. Astarita and S. Princen. (2014). Adjusting the Budget Balance for the Business Cycle: The EU Methodology, European Economy: Economic Papers, no. 536, European Commission.
Radaelli, C.M. (2003). ‘The Europeanisation of Public Policy.’ In The Politics of Europeanisation, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 27–56.
Raudla, R. and R. Kattel. (2013). ‘Fiscal Stress Management during the Financial and Economic Crisis: The Case of the Baltic Countries.’ International Journal of Public Administration 36(10): 732-742.
Raudla, R. and R. Kattel. 2011. ‘Why Did Estonia Choose Fiscal Retrenchment after the 2008 Crisis?’ Journal of Public Policy 31(2): 163-186.
Raudla, R., K. Keel, and M. Pajussaar. (2018). ‘The Creation of the Fiscal Council in Estonia: Exploring the Explanations for Its Institutional Design.’ Public Budgeting & Finance 38(2): 61-80.
Risse, T., M. Cowles, and J. Caporaso. (2001). ‘Europeanization and Domestic Change.’ In Transforming Europe. Europeanization and Domestic Change, Cornell University Press, London.
Schmidt, V.A. (2002). ‘Europeanization and the Mechanics of Economic Policy Adjustment.’ Journal of European Public Policy 9(6): 894-912.
Schmidt, V.A. (2008). ‘Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse.’ Annual Review of Political Science 11: 303–326.
Schmidt, V.A. (2009). ‘Putting the Political back into Political Economy by Bringing the State Back in yet Again.’ World Politics 61(3): 516-546.
Schmidt, V.A. (2010). ‘Taking Ideas and Discourse Seriously: Explaining Change through Discursive Institutionalism as the Fourth New Institutionalism.’ European Political Science Review 2(1): 1–25.
Schmidt, V.A. (2014). ‘Speaking to the Markets or to the People? A Discursive Institutionalist Analysis of the EU’s Sovereign Debt Crisis.’ The British Journal of P & International Relations 16(1): 188-209.
Schmidt, V.A. and C.M. Radaelli. (2004). ‘Policy Change and Discourse in Europe: Conceptual and Methodological Issues.’ West European Politics 27(2): 183-210.
Skogstad, G. and V.A. Schmidt. (2011). ‘Introduction: Policy Paradigms, Transnationalism, and Domestic Politics.’ In G. Skogstad (ed), Policy Paradigms, Transnationalism, and Domestic Politics. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Trondal, J. (2001). ‘Is there any Social Constructivist-Institutionalist Divide? Unpacking Social Mechanisms affecting Representational Roles among EU Decision-Makers.’ Journal of European Public Policy 8(1): 1-23.