The Errors in Visual Estimation of Plants Cover in the Context of Education of Phytosociology

Open access


In vegetation science including phytosociology, visual estimates of plant cover and point method belong to the common field method to record species composition and their abundance. Two methods were compared: Braun-Blanquet scale and point method using Levy bridge. A group of students performed measurements in five plots belonged to an oak-hornbeam forest Tilio-Carpinetum. It was revealed that there is a very high discrepancy in a observed number of species. Total mean numbers obtained are 13.4 and 31.2 for point method and Braun-Blanquet method respectively. However, there is the significant positive and medium correlation between two methods in terms of estimation of abundance of species. It can be concluded that point-method is not suitable for study of forest floor vegetation. It can be merged with other methods. Due to many repetitive measures, it can be helpful in learning of recognition of species.

[1] Everson CS, Clarke GPY. A comparison of six methods of botanical analysis in the montane grasslands of Natal. Vegetatio. 1987;73(1):47-51. DOI: 10.1007/BF00031850.

[2] Griffin GF. An enhanced wheel-point method for assessing cover, structure and heterogeneity in plant communities. J Range Manage Arch. 1989;42(1):79-81.

[3] Evans RA, Love RM. The step-point method of sampling-a practical tool in range research. J Range Manage Arch. 1957;10(5):208-212.

[4] Kent M. Vegetation Description and Data Analysis: A Practical Approach. John Wiley Sons; 2011.

[5] Londo G. The decimal scale for relev6s of permanent quadrats. Vegetatio. 1976;33:61-64. DOI: 10.1007/BF00055300.

[6] Van der Maarel E. Transformation of cover-abundance values in phytosociology and its effects on community similarity. Vegetatio. 1979;39(2):97-114. DOI: 10.1007/BF00052021.

[7] Van der Maarel E. Transformation of cover abundance values for appropriate numerical treatment. Alternatives to the proposals by Podani. J Veg Sci. 2007;18(5):767-770. DOI: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2007.tb02592.x.

[8] Podani J. Braun-Blanquet’s legacy and data analysis in vegetation science. J Veg Sci. 2006;17:113-117. DOI: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2006.tb02429.x.

[9] Domin K. Problémy a metody rostlinné sociologie a jejich použiti pro výzkum lučnich a pastvinǽch porosto Republiky Ceskoslovenské [Problems and methods of plant sociology and their application for the analysis of meadows and pastures]. Publ. Min. Zem. 1923;39:1-376.

[10] Currall JEP. A transformation of the Domin scale. Vegetatio. 1987;72(2):81-87. DOI: 10.1007/BF00044837.

[11] Doing Kraft H. L’analyse. des carrés permanents. (Analyses. Permanent quadrats). Acta Bot Neerl. 1954;3(3):421-424. DOI: 10.1111/j.1438-8677.1954.tb00307.x.

[12] Lepš J, Hadincová V. How reliable are our vegetation analyses? J Veg Sci. 1992;3:119-124. DOI: 10.2307/3236006.

[13] Klimeš L. Scale-dependent variation in visual estimates of grassland plant cover. J Veg Sci. 2003;14:815-821. DOI: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2003.tb02214.x.

[14] Górecki A, Kozłowski J, Gębczyński M. Ćwiczenia z ekologii. Podręcznik dla studentów biologii ogólnej i biologii środowiskowej [Ecology excercises. Handbook for student of basic ecology and environmental biology]. Kraków, Białystok: Uniwersytet Jagielloński, Filia Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego; 1987.

[15] Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, et al. vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.4-1. 2016.

[16] R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna. Austria: 2016. URL

[17] Baselga A. Partitioning the turnover and nestedness components of beta diversity. Global Ecol Biogeogr. 2010;19:134-143. DOI: 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2009.00490.x.

[18] Baselga A. The relationship between species replacement, dissimilarity derived from nestedness, and nestedness. Global Ecol Biogeogr. 2012;21:1223-1232. DOI: 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00756.x.

[19] Roe CM, Parker GC, Korsten AC, Lister CJ, Weatherall SB, Lodge L, et al. Small-scale spatial autocorrelation in plant communities: the effects of spatial grain and measure of abundance, with an improved sampling scheme. J Veg Sci. 2012;23(3):471-482. DOI: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2011.01375.x.

[20] Hurlbert SH. Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecol Monogr. 1984;54(2):187-211. DOI: 10.2307/1942661.

[21] Beatty SW, Stone EL. The variety of soil microsites created by tree falls. Can J Forest Res. 1986;16(3):539-548. DOI: 10.1139/x86-094.

[22] Klama H. Distribution patterns of liverworts in natural forest communities (Białowieża Primeval Forest, NE Poland). Bielsko-Biała: Wyd. Akad. Techniczno-Humanistycznej; 2002.

[23] Drew WB. Studies on the use of the point-quadrat method of botanical analysis of mixed pasture vegetation. J Agr Res. 1944;69(7):289-297.

[24] Jennings SB, Brown ND, Sheil D. Assessing forest canopies and understorey illumination: canopy closure, canopy cover and other measures. Forestry. 1999;72(1):59-74. DOI: 10.1093/forestry/72.1.59.

[25] Chmura D, Salachna A, Sierka E. Porównanie oceny zwarcia drzewostanu za pomocą metody wizualnej i zwarciomierza [Comparison of visual estimation of the canopy cover with the canopyscope assessment]. Sylwan. 2016;160(6):475-481.


The Journal of Towarzystwo Chemii i Inzynierii Ekologicznej

Journal Information


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 133 133 15
PDF Downloads 53 53 5