Proinnovative Policy and the National Innovation System a case study from Poland

Open access

Abstract

The article explores the main elements of the creation a proinnovation policy in Poland as a new case of public policy. It analyses the current status of proinnovation policy in Poland and the relationships implicit in the Polish National Innovation System. The findings support the conclusion that Polish proinnovation policy and the system through which it is enacted are at an early stage of development which is characteristic of co-called ‘catching-up’ countries. The findings show that there is a need for the strategic and holistic management of this type of sub-functional system to enable it to support SMEs in the development of their capacity for innovation. This should include a wide range of public and private institutions in the context of multi-stage governance.

Black J., Lodge M., Theatcher M., 2005, Regulatory Innovation. A Comparative Analysis, Cheltenham, E. Elgar, Northampton.

Blaug M., 1995, Metodologia ekonomii, PWN, Warszawa.

Buchanan J., 1997, Finanse publiczne w warunkach demokracji, PWN, Warszawa.

Edqiust C., 2004, Systems of Innovation-A Critical Review of the State of the Art, [in:] Handbook of Innovation, J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery, R. Nelson, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L., 2000, The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and ‘Mode 2’ to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations, Research Policy, vol. 29, n.2.

Goodin, RE (ed.) 1996, The Theory of Institutional Design, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Jessop B., 2002, The Future of the Capitalist State, Cambridge Polity, Cambridge.

Jessop B., Sum N.-L., 2006, Beyond the Regulation Approach. Putting Capitalist State in its Place, Cheltenham, E. Elgar, Northampton.

Kapitał intelektualny dla zrównoważonego wzrostu. Kapitał intelektualny jako długookresowy priorytet Polski z perspektywy członkostwa w Unii Europejskiej oraz Prezydencji Polski w Radzie Unii Europejskiej w 2011 roku, MNiSW, Warszawa 25.08.2010.

Konecki K., 2000, Studia z metodologii badań jakościowych. Teoria ugruntowana, PWN, Warszawa.

Kooiman J., 2000, Societal governance. Levels, modes and orders of social-political interaction, [in:] Debating Governance: Authority Steering and Democracy, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Lipsey R., 1989, An Introduction to Positive Economics, Weidenfeld & Nicolson, London.

Löffler E., 2003, Governance and Government. Networking with External Stakeholders, [in:] Public Management and Governance, T. Bovaird, E. Löffler (ed.), London-New York.

Majone G., 2004, Dowody, argumenty, perswazja w procesie politycznym, Wydawnictwo Scholar, Warszawa.

Metcalfe S., 1995, The Economic Foundations of Technology Policy: Equalibrium and Evolutionary Perspectives, [in:] Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technical Change, P. Stoneman (ed.), London.

OECD, 2007, Policy Mix for innovation policy in Poland-key issues and policy recommendations, DSTI/STP/TIP(2006)13 FINAL, Paris-Warsaw.

Oslo Manual 2008, Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, OECD, Paris.

Parsons T., 1977, Social Systems and the Evolution of Action Systems, New York.

Silvermann D., 2009, Interpretacja danych jakościowych. Metody analizy rozmowy, tekstu i interakcji, PWN, Warszawa.

Varblane U., Dyker D., Tamm D., 2007, How to improve the National Innovation Systems of catching-up economies, [in:] Trames 11(61/56), Tartu.

Założenia systemu zarządzania rozwojem Polski, 2009, Ministerstwo Rozwoju Regionalnego, Warszawa.

Journal Information

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 94 94 18
PDF Downloads 27 27 7