Politics of Imperceptibility: Philosophy, Post-Feminism and New Media Arts

Audrone Žukauskaite 1
  • 1 Lithuanian Culture Research Institute

Abstract

The essay discusses Deleuze and Guattari’s notion of becoming-imperceptible and raises the question to what extent it can be interpreted in terms of feminist politics and seen as a specific strategy for new media arts. Although the notion of becoming-imperceptible was condemned by second wave feminists, recent post-feminists representing the third wave argue not for politics of visibility but for politics of invisibility. Examining the practices of Lithuanian feminist media artists, the essay argues that becoming-imperceptible in new media arts means not an escape from visibility or a drive toward annihilation but a new conceptual strategy: becoming-imperceptible creates the potential for social and political change. This new conceptual strategy can be related to the new quality of the image: in this regard there is a close affinity between Deleuze and Guattari’s notion of becoming-imperceptible and the notion of the crystalline image which appears in Deleuze’s film theory: both notions engender duration, temporality and qualitative change. Therefore the essay claims that the crystalline image does not represent the world but recreates this world through multiple, changing and virtual images.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Braidotti, R. 1994. Nomadic Subjects: Embodiment and Sexual Difference in Contemporary Feminist Theory. New York: Columbia University Press.

  • Braidotti, R. 2005. Metamorphoses: Towards a Materialist Theory of Becoming. Cambridge: Polity Press.

  • Braidotti, R. 2006. Transpositions: On Nomadic Ethics. Cambridge: Polity Press.

  • Braidotti, R. 2006. ‘The ethics of becoming-imperceptible’.” - C. V. Boundas (ed.), Deleuze and Philosophy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 133-159.

  • Deleuze, G. 2008. Cinema 2: The Time-Image. Trans. H. Tomlinson; R. Galeta. London, New York: Continuum.

  • Deleuze, G.; Guattari, F. 2004a. Anti-Oedipus. Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Trans. R. Hurley,; M. Seem; H. R. Lane. London, New York: Continuum.

  • Deleuze, G.; Guattari. F. 2004b. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Trans. B. Massumi. London, New York: Continuum.

  • Deleuze, G.; Parnet, C. 2006. Dialogues II. Trans. H. Tomlinson, B. Habberjam. New York, London: Continuum.

  • Grosz, E. 1994. Volatile Bodies: Toward a Corporeal Feminism. Bloomington, Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

  • Grosz, E. 2000. ‘Deleuze’s Bergson: Duration, the virtual and a politics of the future’. -I. Buchanan, C. Colebrook (eds.), Deleuze and Feminist Theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 214-234.

  • Grosz, E. 2005. Time Travels: Feminism, Nature, Power. Crow’s Nest: Allen and Unwin.

  • Phelan, P. 1996. Unmarked: The Politics of Performance. London, New York: Routledge.

  • Rodowick, D. N. 1997. Gilles Deleuze’s Time Machine. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

  • Weinstein, J. 2008. ‘Introduction part II’. - C. Colebrook, J. Weinstein (eds.), Deleuze and Gender. Deleuze Studies, vol. 2. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 20-33.

OPEN ACCESS

Journal + Issues

Search