2012 was the year of film in Estonia, when the 100th anniversary of Estonian film was celebrated. One of the most significant undertakings planned for this occasion was the creation of the Estonian film database (electronic national filmography). Performing this large-scale task was undertaken by the NPO Estonian Film Database, launched in 2007. The main objective of the undertaking was to form a complete Estonian national filmography within ten years (2007-2018) and make it available in a web environment to everyone interested, both in Estonia and abroad. The access to the database was opened in late fall, 2012 (www.efis.ee).
Together with newsreels, the number of produced items reaches over 12 000. Feature films, documentaries and popular films, anima, television, educational programmes, advertising films and newsreels form a rich collection of the life, history, culture and people of Estonia. Nearly 3 000 filmmakers and most Estonian actors and actresses have participated in creating the Estonian film heritage. Several thousand people, events, places, buildings, offices and institutions in Estonia participate in or are mentioned in the films. In addition, the films are adressing several thousand people shown or talking in films. The electronic database opens the film treasury in a summarised way, employing a variety of possibilities offered by modern electronic databases.
A metadata system and coding instructions were prepared for each film, person and institution in the extensive space of attributes with search options, which combines the interactive features of a film directory and bibliographical, biographical databases. Each film is described as thoroughly as possible. The attributes of films contain data about the subject, genre, authors, cast, production team, locations, producers, copyrights and distributors of films and about the technical parameters of films, as well as the bibliography of films, references to the reviews, articles, books published about films and the makers of films, digitised frames and pictures from films, trailers and promotional clips, scripts, memories of the makers and other interesting details. The subject content of films is indexed in 12 categories and related sub-groups and enables the search of films by plot/subject content, physical items, themes of newsreels and feature films, people, time, events, locations, building sites and institutions. In addition, films are indexed by a film-adapted UDC. As a result, more than 50 000 keywords enable thorough multi-layered content and subject search. All filmmakers are given their personal websites, which provides an overview of their creative careers and filmographies.
The electronic film database is interfaced with other similar databases at the Estonian Public Broadcasting, film archive of the National Archives, National Library and the Baltic Film and Media School of the Tallinn University. The web interface offers the possibility to enter with an ID-card and allows advance into several digital storages, where it is possible to view the films produced and purchase them for streaming. The filmography is interfaced with social networks (Facebook, Twitter) and is aiming the possibility to interlink it with the European Film Gateway in the future, thus offering access to a digitised film treasury through Europeana. The database is aimed at film professionals, teachers, students, researchers and the general public as the target audience.
Among others, the key issues of cultural databases draw on the approaches and solutions for information retrieval and are relying in particular on the principles of conceptual (intellectual) subject indexing of audiovisual artefacts. Inspired by classical works of Panofsky, Shatford, Turner and others regarding image description, analysis and interpretation the article covers some main issues regarding options for a multifunctional film indexing metadata. The text tackles different aspects of the description of moving images for public needs in general and also describes the specific details of the system, developed for deep keywording of Estonian films. The rationale, limits and disputable issues as well as our experience and basic suggestions for professional indexers who are undertaking these kind of tasks are also revealed.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
Besiki, S.; Jörgensen, C.; Wu, S. 2012. ‘Establishing the value of socially-created metadata to image indexing’. - Library & Information Science Research, 34, 99-109.
Bron, M.; Nack, F.; van Gorp, J.; de Rijke, M. 2011. ‘Exploratory search in an audio-visual archive: Evaluating a professional search tool for nonprofessional users’. - Proceedings of the 1st European Workshop on Human-Computer Interaction and Information Retrieval (EuroHCIR 2011), Newcastle, UK, 4 July.
Enser, P. 2008. ‘The evolution of visual information retrieval’. - Journal of Information Science, 34, 4, 531-546.
Herzum, M. 2003. ‘Requests for information from a film archive: a case study of multimedia retrieval’. - Journal of Documentation, 59, 2, 168-186.
JISC Digital Media 2013. Approaches to Describing Images. http://www.jiscdigitalmedia.ac.uk/guide/approaches-to-describing-images (1 June 2013).
Joassoone, D.; Peterson, E. 2011. Video ja televisioon lõimitud keele- ja aineõppe toetajana. Tartu: AS Atlex.
Hixson, C. 2003. Analyzing the Subject of a Picture: Guidelines. University of Oregon Libraries, http://library.uoregon.edu/sites/default/files/data/diglib/meta/Image_Subj_Analysis.pdf (28 September 2013).
Internet Movie Database (IMDb) sisu märksõnastik. http://www.imdb.com/Sections/Keywords/ (1 June 2013).
Jaimes, A.; Chang, S.-F. 2000. ‘A conceptual framework for indexing visual information at multiple levels’. - IS&T/SPIE Internet Imaging, 3964. http://www.ee.columbia.edu/ln/dvmm/publications/00/ajaimes-spie00_internet.pdf (1 June 2013).
Nilbe, S. 1994. Liigitamine ja märksõnastamine arvutikataloogis. Tartu Ülikooli raamatukogu. http://www.utlib.ee/ee/konverentsid/1994/black.html (1 June 2013).
Ménard, E. 2007. ‘Image indexing: How can I find a nice pair of Italian shoes?’ - Bulletin of the American Society of Information Science and Technology, October/November, 22-25.
Ménard, E. 2009. ‘Images: Indexing for accessibility in a multi-lingual environment - challenges and perspectives’. - The Indexer, 27, 2, 70-76.
Ménard, E. 2010. ‘Image indexing and retrieval: Challenges and new perspectives’. - The Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 34, 3, 245-248.
Neugebauer, T. 2010. ‘Image indexing’. - The Indexer, 28, 3, 98-103.
Rafferty, P. 2011. ‘Informative tagging of images: The importance of modality in interpretation’. - Knowledge Organization, 38, 4, 283-298.
Rasmussen, E. M. 1997. ‘Indexing images’. - Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 32, 169-196.
Reser, G. 2012. ‘What not to embed: Is it better not to embed certain cultural heritage metadata in images?’ - Visual Resources Association Bulletin, 39, 1, 5.
Rorissa, A.; Iyer, H. 2008. ‘Theories of cognition and image categorization: What category labels reveal about basic level theory’. - Journal of the American Society of Information Science and Technology, 59, 9, 1383-1392.
Shatford, S. 1986. ‘Analyzing the subject of a picture: A theoretical approach’. - Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 6, 3, 39-62.
Shatford Layne, S. 1994. ‘Some issues in the indexing of images’. - Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45, 583-588.
Stewart, B. 2010. ‘Getting the picture: An exploratory study of current indexing practices in providing subject access to historic photographs’. - The Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science (La Revue canadienne des sciences del’information et de bibliothéconomie), 34, 3, 297-327.
Svenonius, E. 1994. ‘Access to nonbook materials: The limits of subject indexing for visual and aural languages’. - Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45, 8, 600-606.
Stockinger, P. 2007. ‘The PCI ontology: Presentation and discussion of an ontology for the description and indexing of audiovisual resources in the field of cultural heritage of minorities and indigenous people’. - Proceeding of Specific Rargeted Research Project IST Call 4 - FP6-2004-IST-4. LOGOS: Knowledge-on- Demand for Ubiquitous Learning.
Terris, O. 2000. ‘‘What you don’t see and don’t hear’: Subject indexing moving images’. - Multimedia Information and Technology, 26, 1, 57-60.
The Movie Genome. http://www.jinni.com/movie-genome.html (1 July 2013).
Turner, J. M. 1997. ‘Indexing pictures: some considerations’. - Annual Meeting Council on Botanical and Horticultural Libraries, Jardin botanique de Montréal. http://turner.ebsi.umontreal.ca/english/texts/cbhl97.htm (1 June 2013).
Sam, H. 2009. ‘Cataloging and preservation of moving images: A survey of organisations and initiatives’. - PNLA Quaterly, 73, 4.
Šein, H. 2012. Filmiandmebaaside annoteeritud kogu.Tallinn: Eesti Filmi Andmebaas. http://www.efa.ee (27 September 2013).