Using 3D Scanning Techniques in Orthopedic Systems Modeling

Open access


Designing orthopedic implants with a long lifespan is essential for improving patients’ quality of life. It is necessary to develop new products with a high degree of personalization for the human body. Physicians and engineers analyzed the geometry and behavior of healthy joints’ motion under specific load conditions as well as the behavior over time and lifetime of orthopedic implants fitted to patients to improve their quality. The paper presents the way in which three-dimensional modeling techniques using specialized software (Catia, SolidWorks) can be combined with reverse engineering techniques (3D scanning) to optimize the design of orthopedic implants. The design of an implant consists of its three-dimensional modeling, as well as simulation of its integration into the human body, in order to analyze its behavior during motion. Therefore, it is necessary not only to 3D model the parts that make up the implant itself, but also to 3D model the bone to which the implant will be fitted. The paper highlights the complementarity of the classic modeling techniques with the reverse engineering techniques, which is necessary because the design of the parts that make up the implant itself can be achieved by specialized software modeling techniques, while the bones, having complex geometries, are better suited to 3D Modeling by scanning.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • [1] I. I. Cofaru Summary of the PhD thesis Researches regarding the biomechanics of the axial deviations of the human lower member and the development of the correspondent surgical devices

  • [2] S. Pickering D. Armstrong Alignment in total knee replacement (TKA) 2012 British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery

  • [3] R.W. Brouwer T.S. Jakma S.M. Bierma-Zeinstra A.Z. Ginai J.A. Verhaar The whole leg radiograph: standing versus supine for determining axial alignment Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica 2003; 74 (5): 565–568

  • [4] A. Williams M. Logan Understanding Tibio-Femoral motion The Knee Volume 11 (2004) pp. 81–88

  • [5]

  • [6] S. Mihai V. Filip New design concept for reducing torque wear on implant Applied Mechanics and Materials Vol. 658 (2014) pp. 453-458

  • [7] F. F. Cintra A. K. Yepéz M. G. S. Rasga M. Abagge P. G. C. Alencar Tibial component in revision of total knee arthroplasty: Compararison between cement and hybrid fixation Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia 2011 V46(5) pp. 585-590

  • [8] A. Mittal P.B. Bhosale A.V. Suryawanshi and S. Purohit One – stage long-stem total knee arthroplasty for arthritic knees with stress fractures Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery 2013; Vol. 21 No. 2 pp.199-203

  • [9] T. Tóth J. Živčák A Comparison of the Outputs of 3D Scanners Procedia Engineering Volume 69 2014 pp. 393-401

  • [10] Şt. Cristea A. Prundeanu Fl. Groseanu and D. Gârtone The Role of Arthroscopy in Mini-Invasive Treatment of Tibial Plateau Fractures Chapter from the book Modern Arthroscopy pp. 225-236

Journal information
Cited By
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 178 105 3
PDF Downloads 156 115 7