The majority of residents in Latvia live in standard multi-storey residential buildings, which were constructed between 1950 and 1992. At present, these buildings are obsolete; besides, in the course of construction process the durability and reliability levels were planned to be insufficient. In Riga, residents of standard multi-storey residential buildings do not support building renovation and are passive, despite the availability of the EU and government support as well as co-financing of building renovation projects. The majority of the respondents assume that the apartment is the most significant asset of the family. Moreover, 34 % - 69 % of the participants have renovated their apartment and save resources within their apartment boundaries. Only some respondents evaluate the technical condition of communal property, but most respondents do not have information concerning resource supply and energy accounting as well as are not interested in resource saving possibilities within the building in general, and do not understand the importance of technical maintenance of the building.
Abdulai, R. T., Obeng-Odoom, F., Ochieng, E., & Maliene, V. (Eds.). (2016). Real Estate, Construction and Economic Development in Emerging Market Economies. Routledge Studies in International Real Estate. New York, NY: Routledge, 404 p.
Ali, H. H. & Nsairat S. F. A. (2009). Developing a green building assessment tool for developing countries - Case of Jordan. Building and Environment, 44(5), 1053-1064 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2008.07.015
Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia [Latvijas centrālās statistikas pārvaldes portāls]. (2016). Statistic Database. [Palielinās atjaunīgo energoresursu īpatsvars pārveidošanas sektorā]. Retrieved June 20, 2016, from http://www.csb.gov.lv/en/notikumi/transformation-sector-showsincrease-share-renewables-44046.html.html [in Latvian]
Chau, C. K., Tse, M. S., & Chung, K. Y. (2010). A choice experiment to estimate the effect of green experience on preferences and willingness-to-pay for green building attributes. Building and Environment, 45(11), 2553-2561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.05.017
Cole, R. J. (2005). Building environmental assessment methods: redefining intentions and roles. Building Research & Information, 35(5), 455-467. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210500219063
Diaz-Sarachaga, J. M., Jato-Espino, D., Alsulami, B., & Castro-Fresno, D. (2016). Evaluation of existing sustainable infrastructure rating systems for their application in developing countries. Ecological Indicators, 71, 491-502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.07.033
Ding, G. K. C. (2008). Sustainable construction - The role of environmental assessment tools. Journal of Environmental Management, 86(3), 451-464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.12.025
Engel, U., Jann, B., Lynn, P., Scherpenzeel, A., & Sturgis, P. (2014). Improving Survey Methods: Lessons from Recent Research. New York, NY: Routledge.
Geipele, S., Geipele, I., Slava, D., & Stamure, I. (2012). Social, economic and legal problems of housing management in Latvia. 7th International Scientific Conference Business and Management. 2012. Selected Papers, (pp. 631-638). Lithuania, Vilnius, May 10-11, 2012. https://doi.org/10.3846/bm.2012.082
Kibert, C. J. (2012). Sustainable Construction: Green Building Design and Delivery. John Wiley & Sons, 560 p.
Lavasani, H., & Werner, A. (2012). Practicality and Sustainability of Using HVFA for Concrete Sidewalks. Construction Research Congress 2012, (pp. 1931-1940). West Lafayette, Indiana, United States, May 21-23, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784412329.194
Legislation of the Republic of Latvia. (2015). Dzīvojamo māju pārvaldīšanas likums. [Law On Administration of Residential Houses]. Retrieved February 2, 2016, from http://likumi.lv/ta/id/193573-dzivojamo-maju-parvaldisanas-likums
Sarsby, R., & Meggyes, T. (Eds.). (2009). Construction for a Sustainable Environment. CRC Press, 538 p.
Seo, S., Tucker, S., Ambrose, M., Mitchell, P., & Wang, C. H. (2005). Technical Evaluation of Environmental Assessment Rating Tools, Research and Development Corporation, Project No. PN05.1019, from http://www.fwpa.com.au/images/marketaccess/PN05.1019.pdf.
State Land Service of the Republic of Latvia [Valsts Zemes dienests]. (2016). Latvijas Republikas būvju pārskats 2015. [in Latvian]
Stāmure, I., Kamola, L., & Geipele, I. (2015). Practical Aspects of Sustainable Construction in Latvia. In 5th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, (pp. 2041-2048). United Arab Emirates, Dubai, March 3-5, 2015. Dubai: IEOM Society. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEOM.2015.7093926
Tambovceva, T., Geipele, I., & Geipele, S. (2012). Sustainable Building in Latvia: Development and Future Challenges. In ISEE 2012 Conference - Ecological Economics and Rio+20: Abstracts and Full Papers “Sustainable Building, Green Building, Green Building Assessment, Sustainable Development”, Brasil, Rio de Janeiro, June 16-19, 2012. Rio de Janeiro: International Society for Ecological Economics - ISEE.