Information Warfare on Social Media: A Brand Management Perspective

Open access

Abstract

Employing a perspective informed by brand management, this article aims at understanding information warfare operations in social media. The state, seen as brand, must project an image of itself to both internal and foreign audiences to unite the domestic audience and/or attract global support. However, in constructing a brand, states are vulnerable to ‘sofa warriors’ – ordinary individuals who have been unwittingly recruited by hostile actors to disseminate (over social media or other platforms) a counter-brand, harmful to the state concerned. These new threats are investigated in light of recent tendencies in online branding, elucidating their status as a national security threat, with the potential to significantly disrupt life in political communities.

1. Aliaksandrau, Andrei, and Helen Womack. “Brave New War,” Index on Censorship 43(4) (2014): 56–60.

2. Aula, Pek ka. “Social Media, Reputation Risk and Ambient Publicity Management.” Strategy and Leadership 38(6) (2010): 43–49.

3. Baines, Paul R., and Nicholas J. O’Shaughnessy. “Political Marketing and Propaganda: Uses, Abuses, Misuses.” Journal of Political Marketing 13(1-2) (2014): 1–18.

4. Batorski, Dominik, and Ilona Grzwińska. “Three Dimensions of the Public Sphere on Facebook.” Information, Communication & Society [published online before print on February 6, 2017] // DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2017.1281329.

5. BBC. “The Future of News” (January 2015) // http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/bsp/hi/pdfs/29_01_15future_of_news.pdf.

6. Berthon, Pierre R., Leyland F. Pitt, Kirk Plangger, and Daniel Shapiro. “Marketing Meets Web 2.0, Social Media, and Creative Consumers: Implications for International Marketing Strategy.” Business Horizons 55(3) (2012): 261–271.

7. Black, Iain, and Cleopatra Veloutsou. “Working Consumers: Co-creation of Brand Identity, Consumer Identity and Brand Community Identity.” Journal of Business Research 70 (2017): 416–429.

8. Blank, Stephen. “Russian Information Warfare as Domestic Counterinsurgency.” American Foreign Policy Interests: The Journal of the National Committee on American Foreign Policy 35(1) (2013): 31–44.

9. Brighi, Elisabetta, and Antonio Cerella. “An Alternative Vision of Politics and Violence: Introducing Mimetic Theory in International Studies.” Journal of International Political Theory 11(1) (2015): 3–25.

10. Castells, Manuel. The Power of Identity. Malden and Oxford: Willey-Blackwell, 2010.

11. Chen, Hailiang, Prabuddha De, Yu Hu, and Byoung Hyoun Hwang. “Wisdom of Crowds: The Value of Stock Opinions Transmitted through Social Media.” The Review of Financial Studies 27(5) (2014): 1367–1403.

12. Collings, Deirdre, and Rafal Rohozinski. Bullets and Blogs: New Media and the Warfighter. US Army War College, Centre for Strategic Leadership, 2009 // http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf&AD=ADA508195.

13. Cornelissen, Scarlett. “National Meaning-Making in Complex Societies: Political Legitimation and Branding Dynamics in Post-Apartheid South Africa.” Geopolitics (2017) [published online before print on February 1, 2017] // DOI: 10.1080/14650045.2017.1278695.

14. Cova, Bernard, and Tim White. “Counter-brand and Alter-brand Communities: The Impact of Web 2.0 on Tribal Marketing Approaches.” Journal of Marketing Management 26(3-4) (2010): 256–270.

15. Cromie, John G., and Mike T. Ewing. “The Rejection of Brand Hegemony.” Journal of Business Research 62(2) (2009): 218–230.

16. Deutsche Welle. “Digital Media in Ukraine Conflict: A Blessing or a Curse?” (July 2014) // http://www.dw.de/digital-media-in-ukraine-conflict-blessing-or-a-curse/a-17754636.

17. Dijkmans, Corné, Peter C. Kerkhof, and Camiel J. Beukeboom. “A Stage to Engage: Social Media Use and Corporate Reputation.” Tourism Management 47: 58–67.

18. Dougherty, Jill. “Everyone Lies: The Ukraine Conflict and Russia’s Media Transformation.” Harvard Kennedy School Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy, Discussion Paper Series #D-88 (2014) // http://shorensteincenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/d88-dougherty.pdf.

19. Downer, Lorann. “It’s the Equity Stupid! Protecting the Value of the Partisan Brand.” Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing 28(1) (2016): 22–39.

20. Duan, Weijing, Bin Gu, and Andrew B. Whinston. “Do Online Reviews Matter? An Empirical Investigation of Panel Data.” Decision Support Systems 45(4) (2008): 1007–1016.

21. Duvanova, Dinissa, Alexander Semenov, and Alexander Nikolaev. “Do Social Networks Bridge Political Divides? The Analysis of VKontakte Social Network Communication in Ukraine.” Post-Soviet Affairs 31(3) (2015): 224–249.

22. Erkan, Ismail, and Chris Evans. “The Influence of eWOM in Social Media on Consumers’ Purchase Intentions: An Extended Approach to Information Adoption.” Computers in Human Behavior 61 (2016): 47–55.

23. Fournier, Susan, and Jill Avery. “The Uninvited Brand.” Business Horizons 54(3) (2011): 193–207.

24. French, Alan, and Gareth Smith. “Measuring Political Brand Equity: A Consumer Oriented Approach.” European Journal of Marketing 44(3-4) (2010): 460–477.

25. Gaines-Ross, Leslie. “Reputation Warfare.” Harvard Business Review (December 2010): 2 // https://hbr.org/2010/12/reputation-warfare.

26. Goolsby, Rebecca. On Cybersecurity, Crowdsourcing, and Social Cyber-attack. Office of Naval Research // http://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/127219170-On-Cybersecurity-Crowdsourcing-Cyber-Attack-Commons-Lab-Policy-Memo-Series-Vol-1.pdf.

27. Gottshalk, Sabrina, and Alexander Mafael. “Cutting through the Online Review Jungle: Investigating Selective eWOM Processing.” Journal of Interactive Marketing 37 (2017): 89–104.

28. Graham, Mark, Matthew Zook, and Andrew Boulton. “Augmented Reality in Urban Places: Contested Content and the Duplicity of Code.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 38(3) (2013): 464–479.

29. Gunitsky, Seva. “Corrupting the Cyber-commons: Social Media as a Tool of Autocratic Stability.” Perspectives on Politics 13(1) (2015): 42–54.

30. Heickerö, Roland. Dark Sides of the Internet: On Cyber Threats and Information Warfare. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 2012.

31. Heng, Yee-Kuang. “Beyond ‘Kawaii’ Pop Culture: Japan’s Normative Soft Power as Global Trouble-shooter.” The Pacific Review 27(2) (2014): 176–192.

32. Hooghe, Marc, Marien Sofie, and Thomas de Vroome. “The Cognitive Basis of Trust: The Relation between Education, Cognitive Ability and Political Trust.” Intelligence 40(6) (2012): 605–613.

33. Hopf, Ted. “The Logic of Habit in International Relations.” European Journal of International Relations 16(4) (2010): 539–561.

34. Ivarsflaten, Elisabeth, and Kristin Strømsnes. “Inequality, Diversity and Social Trust in Norwegian Communities.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 23(3) (2013): 322–342.

35. Jin, Seung-A Annie, and Joe Phua. “Following Celebrities’ Tweets About Brands: The Impact of Twitter-Based Electronic Word-of-Mouth on Consumers’ Source Credibility Perception, Buying Intention, and Social Identification with Celebrities.” Journal of Advertising 43(2) (2014): 181–195.

36. Joseph, Sarah. “Social Media, Political Change, and Human Rights.” Boston College International & Comparative Law Review 35 (2012): 145–188.

37. Just, Natascha, and Michael Latzer. “Governance by Algorithms: Reality Construction by Algorithmic Selection on the Internet.” Media, Culture & Society 39(2) (2017): 238–258.

38. Kaneva, Nadia. “Nation Branding: Toward an Agenda for Critical Research.” International Journal of Communication 5 (2011): 117–141.

39. Kaplan, Andreas M., and Michael Haenlein. “Users of the World, Unite! The Challenges and Opportunities of Social Media.” Business Horizons 53(1) (2010): 59–68.

40. Karlsrud, John. “Peacekeeping 4.0: Harnessing the Potential of Big Data, Social Media, and Cyber Technologies”: 141–160. In: Jan Frederik Kremer and Benedikt Müller, eds. Cyberspace and International Relations: Theory, Prospects and Challenges. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer, 2014.

41. Kedzior, Richard, Douglas E. Allen, and Jonathan Schroeder. “The Selfie Phenomenon: Consumer Identities in the Social Media Marketplace.” European Journal of Marketing 50 (2016): 1767–1772.

42. Kellehear, Allan. “Dying in the UK? Politics, Ideologies, and Futures”: 83–96. In: Anette Pankratz, Klaus-Ulrich Viol, and Arianne de Waal, eds. Birth and Death in British Culture: Liminality, Power, and Performance. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2012.

43. Kozachenko, Ivan. “How Social Media Transformed Pro-Russian Nostalgia into Violence in Ukraine.” The Conversation (October 2014) // http://theconversation.com/how-social-media-transformed-pro-russian-nostalgia-into-violence-in-ukraine-33046.

44. Kozinets, Robert V., Kristine de Valck, Andrea C. Wojnicki, and Sarah J. S. Wilner. “Networked Narratives: Understanding Word-of-mouth Marketing in Online Communities.” Journal of Marketing 74 (2010): 71–89.

45. Lange-Ionatamishvili, Elina, and Sanda Svetoka. Strategic Communications and Social Media in the Ukraine Russia Conflict. Riga: NATO Strategic Communication Centre of Excellence, 2015 // https://ccdcoe.org/sites/default/files/multimedia/pdf/CyberWarinPerspective_Lange_Svetoka_12.pdf.

46. Lawson, Sean. “Beyond Cyber-doom: Assessing the Limits of Hypothetical Scenarios in the Framing of Cyber-threats.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics 10(1) (2013): 86–103.

47. Lee, Jae Kook, Jihyang Choi, Chensoo Kim, and Yonghwan Kim. “Social Media, Network Heterogeneity, and Opinion Polarization.” Journal of Communication 64(4) (2014): 702–722.

48. Lee, Jumin, Do-Hyung Park, and Ingoo Han. “The Effect of Negative Online Consumer Reviews on Product Attitude: An Information Processing View.” Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 7(3) (2008): 341–352.

49. Lee, Robert M., and Thomas Rid. “OMG cyber!” The RUSI Journal 159(5) (2014): 4–12.

50. Lees-Marshment, Jennifer. Political Marketing: Principles and Applications. Abingdon and New York: Routledge, 2014.

51. Lilleker, Darren G. “Interactivity and Branding: Public Political Communication as a Marketing Tool.” Journal of Political Marketing 14(1-2) (2015): 111–128.

52. Lusher, Dean, Garry Robins, Philippa E. Pattison, and Alessandro Lomi. “‘Trust Me’: Differences in Expressed and Perceived Trust Relations in an Organization.” Social Networks 34(4) (2012): 410–424.

53. Marland, Alex, J. P. Lewis, and Tom Flanagan. “Governance in the Age of Digital Media and Branding.” Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 30(1) (2017): 125–141.

54. NATO STRATCOM. Analysis of Russia’s Information Campaign against Ukraine. Riga: NATO Strategic Communication Centre of Excellence, 2015b // http://www.stratcomcoe.org/download/file/fid/3213.

55. NATO STRATCOM. DAESH Information Campaign and Its Influence: Results of the Study. Riga: NATO Strategic Communication Centre of Excellence, 2016 // http://stratcomcoe.org/download/file/fid/3107.

56. NATO STRATCOM. Internet Trolling as a Hybrid Warfare Tool: The Case of Latvia. Riga: NATO Strategic Communication Centre of Excellence, 2015a // http://www.stratcomcoe.org/download/file/fid/3213.

57. NATO STRATCOM. Russian Information Campaign against the Ukrainian State and Defence Forces: Combined Analysis. Riga: NATO Strategic Communication Centre of Excellence, 2017 // http://www.stratcomcoe.org/download/file/fid/5234.

58. Needham, Catherine. “Brand Leaders: Clinton, Blair and the Limitations of the Permanent Campaign.” Political Studies 53(2) (2005): 343–361.

59. Newman, Daniel. “In the Age of Experience: The Best Brands Tell Better Stories and Make you a Part of Them.” Forbes (March 2016) // http://www.forbes.com/sites/danielnewman/2016/03/08/in-the-age-of-experience-the-best-brands-tell-better-stories-and-make-you-a-part-of-them/#781372ca4e2c.

60. Newman, Nick, and David A. L. Levy, eds. Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2014: Tracking the Future of News. Oxford University Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, 2014 // https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/Reuters%20Institute%20Digital%20News%20Report%202014.pdf.

61. Nye, Joseph S. Soft power: The means to success in world politics. New York: Public Affairs, 2004.

62. Ormrod, Robert, and Heather Savigny. “Political Market Orientation: A Framework for Understanding Relationship Structures in Political Parties.” Party Politics 18(4) (2012): 487–502.

63. Rasmussen, Rasmus Kjærgaard, and Henrik Merkelsen. “The New PR of States: How Nation Branding Practices Affect the Security Function of Public Diplomacy.” Public Relations Review 38(5) (2012): 810–818.

64. Reuter, Ora John, and David Szakonyi. “Online Social Media and Political Awareness in Authoritarian Regimes.” British Journal of Political Science 45(1) (2015): 29–51.

65. Rød, Esoen Geelmuyden, and Nils B. Weidman. “Empowering Activists or Autocrats? The Internet in Authoritarian Regimes.” Journal of Peace Research 52(3) (2015): 338–351.

66. Rokka, Joonas, Katariina Karlsson, and Janne Tienari. “Balancing Acts: Managing Employees and Reputation in Social Media.” Journal of Marketing and Management 30(7-8) (2014): 802–827.

67. Ronfeldt, David, John Arquilla, Graham E. Fuller, and Melissa Fuller. The Zapatista Netwar in Mexico. Santa Monica and Washington, DC: RAND Corporation, 1998.

68. Roselle, Laura, Alister Miskimmon, and Ben O’Loughlin. “Strategic Narrative: A New Means to Understand Soft Power.” Media, War & Conflict 7(1) (2014): 70–84.

69. Rutsaert, Pieter, et al. “The Use of Social Media in Food Risk and Benefit Communication.” Trends in Food Science and Technology 30(1) (2013): 84–91.

70. Samoilenko, Sergei. “The Situation in Ukraine: One or Many Realities?” Russian Journal of Communication 6(2) (2014): 193–198.

71. Sánchez Abril, Patricia, Avner Levin, and Alissa Del Riego. “Blurred Boundaries: Social Media Privacy and the Twenty-first Century Employee.” American Business Law Journal 49(1) (2012): 63–124.

72. Scammell, Margaret. Consumer Democracy: The Marketing of Politics. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.

73. Scammell, Margaret. “Political Brands and Consumer Citizens: The Rebranding of Tony Blair.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 611 (2007): 176–192.

74. Scammell, Margaret. “Politics and Image: The Conceptual Value of Branding.” Journal of Political Marketing 14 (2015): 7–18.

75. Schiwinski, Bruno, and Dariusz Dabrowski. “The Effect of Social Media Communication on Consumer Perceptions of Brands.” Journal of Marketing Communications 22(2) (2016): 189–214.

76. Schniederjans, Dara, Edita S. Cao, and Marc Schniederjans. “Enhancing Financial Performance with Social Media: An Impression Management Perspective.” Decision Support Systems 55(4) (2013): 911–918.

77. Servaes, Jan. “The Many Faces of (Soft) Power, Democracy, and the Internet.” Telematics and Informatics 30(4) (2013): 322–330.

78. Shearing, Clifford, and Less Johnstone. “Nodal Wars and Network Fallacies: A Genealogical Analysis of Global Insecurities.” Theoretical Criminology 14(4) (2010): 495–514.

79. Smith, Brian G. “Socially Distributing Public Relations: Twitter, Haiti, and Interactivity in Social Media.” Public Relations Review 36 (2010): 329–335.

80. Smith, Gareth, and Alan French. “Measuring the Changes to Leader Brand Associations During the 2010 Election Campaign.” Journal of Marketing Management 27(7-8) (2011): 718–735.

81. Speed, Richard, Patrick Butler, and Neil Collins. “Human Branding in Political Marketing: Applying Contemporary Branding Thought to Political Parties and Their Leaders.” Journal of Political Marketing 14(1-2) (2015): 129–151.

82. Standing, Guy. “Tertiary time: The Precariat’s Dilemma.” Public Culture 25(1) (2012): 5–23.

83. Stefanidis, Anthony, et al. “Demarcating New Boundaries: Mapping Virtual Polycentric Communities through Social Media Content.” Cartography and Geographic Information Science 40(2) (2013): 116–129.

84. Sweet, Julia. “Political Invasions into Collective Memories: Russia.” International Journal of Communication 10 (2016): 4512–4531.

85. The Economist. “The Role of Technology in the Presidential Election” (November 2016) // http://www.economist.com/news/united-states/21710614-fake-news-big-data-post-mortem-under-way-role-technology.

86. Thorson, Emily. “Belief Echoes: The Persistent Effects of Corrected Misinformation.” Political Communication 33(3) (2016): 460–480.

87. Vandiver, John. “Allies Must Prepare for Russia ‘Hybrid War’.” Stars and Stripes (September 2014) // http://www.stripes.com/news/saceur-allies-must-prepare-for-russia-hybrid-war-1.301464.

88. Van Elsas, Erika. “Political Trust as a Rational Attitude: A Comparison of the Nature of Political Trust across Different Levels of Education.” Political Studies 63(5) (2015): 1158–1178.

89. Van Laer, Jeroen, and Peter van Aelst. “Internet and Social Movement Action Repertoires: Opportunities and Limitations.” Information, Communication & Society 13(8) (2010): 1146–1171.

90. Van Niekerk, Bret, and Manoj Maharaj. “Social Media and Information Conflict.” International Journal of Communication 7 (2013): 1162–1184.

91. Viner, Katharine. “How Technology Disrupted the Truth.” The Guardian (July 2016) // https://www.theguardian.com/media/2016/jul/12/how-technology-disrupted-the-truth.

92. Wadhera, Mike. “The Information Age is Over; Welcome to the Experience Age.” Tech Crunch (May 2016) // https://techcrunch.com/2016/05/09/the-information-age-is-over-welcome-to-the-experience-age.

93. Warren, T. Camber. “Not by Sword Alone: Soft Power, Mass Media, and the Production of State Sovereignty.” International Organization 68(1) (2014): 111–141.

94. Wilson, Michelle. “Algorithms (and the) Everyday.” Information, Communication & Society 20(1) (2017): 137–150.

95. Yannakogeorgos, Panayotis A. “Rethinking the Threat of Cyberterrorism”: 43–62. In: Thomas M. Chen, Lee Jarvis, and Stuart Macdonald, eds. Cyberterrorism: Understanding, Assessment, and Response. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer, 2012.

96. Yu, Yang, Wenjing Duan, and Qing Cao. “The Impact of Social and Conventional Media on Firm Equity Value: A Sentiment Analysis Approach.” Decision Support Systems 55(4) (2013): 919–926.

Baltic Journal of Law & Politics

A Journal of Vytautas Magnus University

Journal Information


CiteScore 2017: 0.22

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.119
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.113

Target Group researchers and scholars in the fields of law and politics, with an acute interest in the cross-pollinations of disciplines, comparative approaches to regional issues, and active dialogue on pressing contemporary issues of theoretical and practical import.

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 894 883 80
PDF Downloads 518 514 55