Information Warfare on Social Media: A Brand Management Perspective

Open access

Abstract

Employing a perspective informed by brand management, this article aims at understanding information warfare operations in social media. The state, seen as brand, must project an image of itself to both internal and foreign audiences to unite the domestic audience and/or attract global support. However, in constructing a brand, states are vulnerable to ‘sofa warriors’ – ordinary individuals who have been unwittingly recruited by hostile actors to disseminate (over social media or other platforms) a counter-brand, harmful to the state concerned. These new threats are investigated in light of recent tendencies in online branding, elucidating their status as a national security threat, with the potential to significantly disrupt life in political communities.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. Aliaksandrau Andrei and Helen Womack. “Brave New War” Index on Censorship 43(4) (2014): 56–60.

  • 2. Aula Pek ka. “Social Media Reputation Risk and Ambient Publicity Management.” Strategy and Leadership 38(6) (2010): 43–49.

  • 3. Baines Paul R. and Nicholas J. O’Shaughnessy. “Political Marketing and Propaganda: Uses Abuses Misuses.” Journal of Political Marketing 13(1-2) (2014): 1–18.

  • 4. Batorski Dominik and Ilona Grzwińska. “Three Dimensions of the Public Sphere on Facebook.” Information Communication & Society [published online before print on February 6 2017] // DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2017.1281329.

  • 5. BBC. “The Future of News” (January 2015) // http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/bsp/hi/pdfs/29_01_15future_of_news.pdf.

  • 6. Berthon Pierre R. Leyland F. Pitt Kirk Plangger and Daniel Shapiro. “Marketing Meets Web 2.0 Social Media and Creative Consumers: Implications for International Marketing Strategy.” Business Horizons 55(3) (2012): 261–271.

  • 7. Black Iain and Cleopatra Veloutsou. “Working Consumers: Co-creation of Brand Identity Consumer Identity and Brand Community Identity.” Journal of Business Research 70 (2017): 416–429.

  • 8. Blank Stephen. “Russian Information Warfare as Domestic Counterinsurgency.” American Foreign Policy Interests: The Journal of the National Committee on American Foreign Policy 35(1) (2013): 31–44.

  • 9. Brighi Elisabetta and Antonio Cerella. “An Alternative Vision of Politics and Violence: Introducing Mimetic Theory in International Studies.” Journal of International Political Theory 11(1) (2015): 3–25.

  • 10. Castells Manuel. The Power of Identity. Malden and Oxford: Willey-Blackwell 2010.

  • 11. Chen Hailiang Prabuddha De Yu Hu and Byoung Hyoun Hwang. “Wisdom of Crowds: The Value of Stock Opinions Transmitted through Social Media.” The Review of Financial Studies 27(5) (2014): 1367–1403.

  • 12. Collings Deirdre and Rafal Rohozinski. Bullets and Blogs: New Media and the Warfighter. US Army War College Centre for Strategic Leadership 2009 // http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf&AD=ADA508195.

  • 13. Cornelissen Scarlett. “National Meaning-Making in Complex Societies: Political Legitimation and Branding Dynamics in Post-Apartheid South Africa.” Geopolitics (2017) [published online before print on February 1 2017] // DOI: 10.1080/14650045.2017.1278695.

  • 14. Cova Bernard and Tim White. “Counter-brand and Alter-brand Communities: The Impact of Web 2.0 on Tribal Marketing Approaches.” Journal of Marketing Management 26(3-4) (2010): 256–270.

  • 15. Cromie John G. and Mike T. Ewing. “The Rejection of Brand Hegemony.” Journal of Business Research 62(2) (2009): 218–230.

  • 16. Deutsche Welle. “Digital Media in Ukraine Conflict: A Blessing or a Curse?” (July 2014) // http://www.dw.de/digital-media-in-ukraine-conflict-blessing-or-a-curse/a-17754636.

  • 17. Dijkmans Corné Peter C. Kerkhof and Camiel J. Beukeboom. “A Stage to Engage: Social Media Use and Corporate Reputation.” Tourism Management 47: 58–67.

  • 18. Dougherty Jill. “Everyone Lies: The Ukraine Conflict and Russia’s Media Transformation.” Harvard Kennedy School Shorenstein Center on Media Politics and Public Policy Discussion Paper Series #D-88 (2014) // http://shorensteincenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/d88-dougherty.pdf.

  • 19. Downer Lorann. “It’s the Equity Stupid! Protecting the Value of the Partisan Brand.” Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing 28(1) (2016): 22–39.

  • 20. Duan Weijing Bin Gu and Andrew B. Whinston. “Do Online Reviews Matter? An Empirical Investigation of Panel Data.” Decision Support Systems 45(4) (2008): 1007–1016.

  • 21. Duvanova Dinissa Alexander Semenov and Alexander Nikolaev. “Do Social Networks Bridge Political Divides? The Analysis of VKontakte Social Network Communication in Ukraine.” Post-Soviet Affairs 31(3) (2015): 224–249.

  • 22. Erkan Ismail and Chris Evans. “The Influence of eWOM in Social Media on Consumers’ Purchase Intentions: An Extended Approach to Information Adoption.” Computers in Human Behavior 61 (2016): 47–55.

  • 23. Fournier Susan and Jill Avery. “The Uninvited Brand.” Business Horizons 54(3) (2011): 193–207.

  • 24. French Alan and Gareth Smith. “Measuring Political Brand Equity: A Consumer Oriented Approach.” European Journal of Marketing 44(3-4) (2010): 460–477.

  • 25. Gaines-Ross Leslie. “Reputation Warfare.” Harvard Business Review (December 2010): 2 // https://hbr.org/2010/12/reputation-warfare.

  • 26. Goolsby Rebecca. On Cybersecurity Crowdsourcing and Social Cyber-attack. Office of Naval Research // http://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/127219170-On-Cybersecurity-Crowdsourcing-Cyber-Attack-Commons-Lab-Policy-Memo-Series-Vol-1.pdf.

  • 27. Gottshalk Sabrina and Alexander Mafael. “Cutting through the Online Review Jungle: Investigating Selective eWOM Processing.” Journal of Interactive Marketing 37 (2017): 89–104.

  • 28. Graham Mark Matthew Zook and Andrew Boulton. “Augmented Reality in Urban Places: Contested Content and the Duplicity of Code.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 38(3) (2013): 464–479.

  • 29. Gunitsky Seva. “Corrupting the Cyber-commons: Social Media as a Tool of Autocratic Stability.” Perspectives on Politics 13(1) (2015): 42–54.

  • 30. Heickerö Roland. Dark Sides of the Internet: On Cyber Threats and Information Warfare. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang 2012.

  • 31. Heng Yee-Kuang. “Beyond ‘Kawaii’ Pop Culture: Japan’s Normative Soft Power as Global Trouble-shooter.” The Pacific Review 27(2) (2014): 176–192.

  • 32. Hooghe Marc Marien Sofie and Thomas de Vroome. “The Cognitive Basis of Trust: The Relation between Education Cognitive Ability and Political Trust.” Intelligence 40(6) (2012): 605–613.

  • 33. Hopf Ted. “The Logic of Habit in International Relations.” European Journal of International Relations 16(4) (2010): 539–561.

  • 34. Ivarsflaten Elisabeth and Kristin Strømsnes. “Inequality Diversity and Social Trust in Norwegian Communities.” Journal of Elections Public Opinion and Parties 23(3) (2013): 322–342.

  • 35. Jin Seung-A Annie and Joe Phua. “Following Celebrities’ Tweets About Brands: The Impact of Twitter-Based Electronic Word-of-Mouth on Consumers’ Source Credibility Perception Buying Intention and Social Identification with Celebrities.” Journal of Advertising 43(2) (2014): 181–195.

  • 36. Joseph Sarah. “Social Media Political Change and Human Rights.” Boston College International & Comparative Law Review 35 (2012): 145–188.

  • 37. Just Natascha and Michael Latzer. “Governance by Algorithms: Reality Construction by Algorithmic Selection on the Internet.” Media Culture & Society 39(2) (2017): 238–258.

  • 38. Kaneva Nadia. “Nation Branding: Toward an Agenda for Critical Research.” International Journal of Communication 5 (2011): 117–141.

  • 39. Kaplan Andreas M. and Michael Haenlein. “Users of the World Unite! The Challenges and Opportunities of Social Media.” Business Horizons 53(1) (2010): 59–68.

  • 40. Karlsrud John. “Peacekeeping 4.0: Harnessing the Potential of Big Data Social Media and Cyber Technologies”: 141–160. In: Jan Frederik Kremer and Benedikt Müller eds. Cyberspace and International Relations: Theory Prospects and Challenges. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer 2014.

  • 41. Kedzior Richard Douglas E. Allen and Jonathan Schroeder. “The Selfie Phenomenon: Consumer Identities in the Social Media Marketplace.” European Journal of Marketing 50 (2016): 1767–1772.

  • 42. Kellehear Allan. “Dying in the UK? Politics Ideologies and Futures”: 83–96. In: Anette Pankratz Klaus-Ulrich Viol and Arianne de Waal eds. Birth and Death in British Culture: Liminality Power and Performance. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing 2012.

  • 43. Kozachenko Ivan. “How Social Media Transformed Pro-Russian Nostalgia into Violence in Ukraine.” The Conversation (October 2014) // http://theconversation.com/how-social-media-transformed-pro-russian-nostalgia-into-violence-in-ukraine-33046.

  • 44. Kozinets Robert V. Kristine de Valck Andrea C. Wojnicki and Sarah J. S. Wilner. “Networked Narratives: Understanding Word-of-mouth Marketing in Online Communities.” Journal of Marketing 74 (2010): 71–89.

  • 45. Lange-Ionatamishvili Elina and Sanda Svetoka. Strategic Communications and Social Media in the Ukraine Russia Conflict. Riga: NATO Strategic Communication Centre of Excellence 2015 // https://ccdcoe.org/sites/default/files/multimedia/pdf/CyberWarinPerspective_Lange_Svetoka_12.pdf.

  • 46. Lawson Sean. “Beyond Cyber-doom: Assessing the Limits of Hypothetical Scenarios in the Framing of Cyber-threats.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics 10(1) (2013): 86–103.

  • 47. Lee Jae Kook Jihyang Choi Chensoo Kim and Yonghwan Kim. “Social Media Network Heterogeneity and Opinion Polarization.” Journal of Communication 64(4) (2014): 702–722.

  • 48. Lee Jumin Do-Hyung Park and Ingoo Han. “The Effect of Negative Online Consumer Reviews on Product Attitude: An Information Processing View.” Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 7(3) (2008): 341–352.

  • 49. Lee Robert M. and Thomas Rid. “OMG cyber!” The RUSI Journal 159(5) (2014): 4–12.

  • 50. Lees-Marshment Jennifer. Political Marketing: Principles and Applications. Abingdon and New York: Routledge 2014.

  • 51. Lilleker Darren G. “Interactivity and Branding: Public Political Communication as a Marketing Tool.” Journal of Political Marketing 14(1-2) (2015): 111–128.

  • 52. Lusher Dean Garry Robins Philippa E. Pattison and Alessandro Lomi. “‘Trust Me’: Differences in Expressed and Perceived Trust Relations in an Organization.” Social Networks 34(4) (2012): 410–424.

  • 53. Marland Alex J. P. Lewis and Tom Flanagan. “Governance in the Age of Digital Media and Branding.” Governance: An International Journal of Policy Administration and Institutions 30(1) (2017): 125–141.

  • 54. NATO STRATCOM. Analysis of Russia’s Information Campaign against Ukraine. Riga: NATO Strategic Communication Centre of Excellence 2015b // http://www.stratcomcoe.org/download/file/fid/3213.

  • 55. NATO STRATCOM. DAESH Information Campaign and Its Influence: Results of the Study. Riga: NATO Strategic Communication Centre of Excellence 2016 // http://stratcomcoe.org/download/file/fid/3107.

  • 56. NATO STRATCOM. Internet Trolling as a Hybrid Warfare Tool: The Case of Latvia. Riga: NATO Strategic Communication Centre of Excellence 2015a // http://www.stratcomcoe.org/download/file/fid/3213.

  • 57. NATO STRATCOM. Russian Information Campaign against the Ukrainian State and Defence Forces: Combined Analysis. Riga: NATO Strategic Communication Centre of Excellence 2017 // http://www.stratcomcoe.org/download/file/fid/5234.

  • 58. Needham Catherine. “Brand Leaders: Clinton Blair and the Limitations of the Permanent Campaign.” Political Studies 53(2) (2005): 343–361.

  • 59. Newman Daniel. “In the Age of Experience: The Best Brands Tell Better Stories and Make you a Part of Them.” Forbes (March 2016) // http://www.forbes.com/sites/danielnewman/2016/03/08/in-the-age-of-experience-the-best-brands-tell-better-stories-and-make-you-a-part-of-them/#781372ca4e2c.

  • 60. Newman Nick and David A. L. Levy eds. Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2014: Tracking the Future of News. Oxford University Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism 2014 // https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/Reuters%20Institute%20Digital%20News%20Report%202014.pdf.

  • 61. Nye Joseph S. Soft power: The means to success in world politics. New York: Public Affairs 2004.

  • 62. Ormrod Robert and Heather Savigny. “Political Market Orientation: A Framework for Understanding Relationship Structures in Political Parties.” Party Politics 18(4) (2012): 487–502.

  • 63. Rasmussen Rasmus Kjærgaard and Henrik Merkelsen. “The New PR of States: How Nation Branding Practices Affect the Security Function of Public Diplomacy.” Public Relations Review 38(5) (2012): 810–818.

  • 64. Reuter Ora John and David Szakonyi. “Online Social Media and Political Awareness in Authoritarian Regimes.” British Journal of Political Science 45(1) (2015): 29–51.

  • 65. Rød Esoen Geelmuyden and Nils B. Weidman. “Empowering Activists or Autocrats? The Internet in Authoritarian Regimes.” Journal of Peace Research 52(3) (2015): 338–351.

  • 66. Rokka Joonas Katariina Karlsson and Janne Tienari. “Balancing Acts: Managing Employees and Reputation in Social Media.” Journal of Marketing and Management 30(7-8) (2014): 802–827.

  • 67. Ronfeldt David John Arquilla Graham E. Fuller and Melissa Fuller. The Zapatista Netwar in Mexico. Santa Monica and Washington DC: RAND Corporation 1998.

  • 68. Roselle Laura Alister Miskimmon and Ben O’Loughlin. “Strategic Narrative: A New Means to Understand Soft Power.” Media War & Conflict 7(1) (2014): 70–84.

  • 69. Rutsaert Pieter et al. “The Use of Social Media in Food Risk and Benefit Communication.” Trends in Food Science and Technology 30(1) (2013): 84–91.

  • 70. Samoilenko Sergei. “The Situation in Ukraine: One or Many Realities?” Russian Journal of Communication 6(2) (2014): 193–198.

  • 71. Sánchez Abril Patricia Avner Levin and Alissa Del Riego. “Blurred Boundaries: Social Media Privacy and the Twenty-first Century Employee.” American Business Law Journal 49(1) (2012): 63–124.

  • 72. Scammell Margaret. Consumer Democracy: The Marketing of Politics. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press 2014.

  • 73. Scammell Margaret. “Political Brands and Consumer Citizens: The Rebranding of Tony Blair.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 611 (2007): 176–192.

  • 74. Scammell Margaret. “Politics and Image: The Conceptual Value of Branding.” Journal of Political Marketing 14 (2015): 7–18.

  • 75. Schiwinski Bruno and Dariusz Dabrowski. “The Effect of Social Media Communication on Consumer Perceptions of Brands.” Journal of Marketing Communications 22(2) (2016): 189–214.

  • 76. Schniederjans Dara Edita S. Cao and Marc Schniederjans. “Enhancing Financial Performance with Social Media: An Impression Management Perspective.” Decision Support Systems 55(4) (2013): 911–918.

  • 77. Servaes Jan. “The Many Faces of (Soft) Power Democracy and the Internet.” Telematics and Informatics 30(4) (2013): 322–330.

  • 78. Shearing Clifford and Less Johnstone. “Nodal Wars and Network Fallacies: A Genealogical Analysis of Global Insecurities.” Theoretical Criminology 14(4) (2010): 495–514.

  • 79. Smith Brian G. “Socially Distributing Public Relations: Twitter Haiti and Interactivity in Social Media.” Public Relations Review 36 (2010): 329–335.

  • 80. Smith Gareth and Alan French. “Measuring the Changes to Leader Brand Associations During the 2010 Election Campaign.” Journal of Marketing Management 27(7-8) (2011): 718–735.

  • 81. Speed Richard Patrick Butler and Neil Collins. “Human Branding in Political Marketing: Applying Contemporary Branding Thought to Political Parties and Their Leaders.” Journal of Political Marketing 14(1-2) (2015): 129–151.

  • 82. Standing Guy. “Tertiary time: The Precariat’s Dilemma.” Public Culture 25(1) (2012): 5–23.

  • 83. Stefanidis Anthony et al. “Demarcating New Boundaries: Mapping Virtual Polycentric Communities through Social Media Content.” Cartography and Geographic Information Science 40(2) (2013): 116–129.

  • 84. Sweet Julia. “Political Invasions into Collective Memories: Russia.” International Journal of Communication 10 (2016): 4512–4531.

  • 85. The Economist. “The Role of Technology in the Presidential Election” (November 2016) // http://www.economist.com/news/united-states/21710614-fake-news-big-data-post-mortem-under-way-role-technology.

  • 86. Thorson Emily. “Belief Echoes: The Persistent Effects of Corrected Misinformation.” Political Communication 33(3) (2016): 460–480.

  • 87. Vandiver John. “Allies Must Prepare for Russia ‘Hybrid War’.” Stars and Stripes (September 2014) // http://www.stripes.com/news/saceur-allies-must-prepare-for-russia-hybrid-war-1.301464.

  • 88. Van Elsas Erika. “Political Trust as a Rational Attitude: A Comparison of the Nature of Political Trust across Different Levels of Education.” Political Studies 63(5) (2015): 1158–1178.

  • 89. Van Laer Jeroen and Peter van Aelst. “Internet and Social Movement Action Repertoires: Opportunities and Limitations.” Information Communication & Society 13(8) (2010): 1146–1171.

  • 90. Van Niekerk Bret and Manoj Maharaj. “Social Media and Information Conflict.” International Journal of Communication 7 (2013): 1162–1184.

  • 91. Viner Katharine. “How Technology Disrupted the Truth.” The Guardian (July 2016) // https://www.theguardian.com/media/2016/jul/12/how-technology-disrupted-the-truth.

  • 92. Wadhera Mike. “The Information Age is Over; Welcome to the Experience Age.” Tech Crunch (May 2016) // https://techcrunch.com/2016/05/09/the-information-age-is-over-welcome-to-the-experience-age.

  • 93. Warren T. Camber. “Not by Sword Alone: Soft Power Mass Media and the Production of State Sovereignty.” International Organization 68(1) (2014): 111–141.

  • 94. Wilson Michelle. “Algorithms (and the) Everyday.” Information Communication & Society 20(1) (2017): 137–150.

  • 95. Yannakogeorgos Panayotis A. “Rethinking the Threat of Cyberterrorism”: 43–62. In: Thomas M. Chen Lee Jarvis and Stuart Macdonald eds. Cyberterrorism: Understanding Assessment and Response. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer 2012.

  • 96. Yu Yang Wenjing Duan and Qing Cao. “The Impact of Social and Conventional Media on Firm Equity Value: A Sentiment Analysis Approach.” Decision Support Systems 55(4) (2013): 919–926.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


CiteScore 2018: 0.42

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.138
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.281

Target audience: researchers and scholars in the fields of law and politics, with an acute interest in the cross-pollinations of disciplines, comparative approaches to regional issues, and active dialogue on pressing contemporary issues of theoretical and practical import.
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1261 648 45
PDF Downloads 690 382 27