Ancient American Board Games, I: From Teotihuacan to the Great Plains

Open access


Besides the ubiquitous patolli—a race game played on a cruciform gameboard—the Aztecs had obviously a few other board games. Unfortunately their names have not been recorded. We owe to Diego Durán, writing in the last quarter of the 16th century from local sources, some hints of what appears to be a “war game” and a second, different race game that he calls ‘fortuna’. A close examination of some Precolumbian codices shows a rectangular design with a chequered border, together with beans and gamepieces, which has correctly been interpreted as a board game. Many similar diagrams can be seen carved on stone in temples and public places, from Teotihuacan (c. 4th-7th century AD) to late Toltec times (9th-12th century AD). Of this game too we do not know the name. It has tentatively been called quauhpatolli (“eagle- or wooden-patolli”) by Christian Duverger (1978)—although this seems to have been the classic post-conquest Nahuatl name for the game of chess—or “proto-patolli”, and more concretely “rectángulo de cintas” (rectangle of bands) by William Swezey and Bente Bittman (1983).

The lack of any representation of this game in all Postcolumbian codices, as painted by Aztec artists commissioned by Spanish scholars interested in the Aztec culture, is clear indication that the game had disappeared before the Spanish conquest, at least in central Mexico. No Aztec site shows any such gameboard. Fortunately this game had survived until the 20th (and 21st!) century but located in the Tarascan country, now the state of Michoacán. It was discovered, unchanged, in a Tarascan (Purepecha) village by Ralph L. Beals and Pedro Carrasco, who published their find in 1944. At that time Beals and Carrasco had no idea the game was attested in early codices and Teotihuacan to Maya and Toltec archaeological sites. In Purepecha the game is called k’uillichi.

There is evidence of an evolution that led to a simplification of the game: less tracks, less gamesmen (in fact only one per player, while k’uillichi has four), and less ‘dice’. From a “complex” race game, the new debased version turned to be a simple single-track race game with no strategy at all. It is possible that this process took place in Michoacán. (A few examples of the simplified game were found in some Tarascan villages.) Also it seems the widespread use of the Nahua language, which the Spanish promoted, led to calling the game, and/or its dice, patol. As it was, patol proved to be very appealing and became very popular in the Mexican West, finally reaching the Noroeste, that is, the present North-West of Mexico and Southwest of the United States.

This seems to have been a recent trend, since its progress was observed with much detail by missionaries living in close contact with the Indians along what was called the ‘Camino Real’, the long highway that led from western Mexico to what is now New Mexico in the U.S. The Spanish themselves seem to have helped the game in its diffusion, unaware of its presence. It is clearly with the Spaniards that the patol game, sometimes also called quince (fifteen), reached the American Southwest and settled in the Pueblo and the Zuñi countries.

It is there that some newcomers, coming from the North or from the Great Plains, and getting in contact with the Pueblos in the 18th century, found the game and took it over. The Kiowas and Kiowa Apaches are noted for their zohn ahl (or tsoñä) game, while the Arapahos call it ne’bäku’thana. A careful examination of zohn ahl shows that it has kept the basic features of an ancient game that came—in Spanish times—from Mexico and may have been popular in Teotihuacan times. Its spread northward—through the Tarascan country—is, hopefully, well documented.

Acuña, R. (1987). Relaciones geográficas del siglo xvi. v. 10. Mexico City, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

Beals, R. L. (1933). The Acaxee: a mountain tribe of Durango and Sinaloa. Ibero-Americana, 6. Berkeley, University of California Press.

Beals, R. L. (1943). The aboriginal culture of the Cáhita Indians. Ibero-Americana, 19. Berkeley, University of California Press.

Beals, R. L. and P. Carrasco (1944). “Games of the mountain Tarascans”. In: American Anthropologist 46, pp. 516–522.

Bennett, W. C. and Zingg, R. M. (1986). Los Tarahumaras: una tribu india del norte de México. Spanish translation of Bennett and Zingg 1935. Mexico City, Instituto Nacional Indigenista.

Bennett, W. C. and R. M. Zingg (1935). The Tarahumara: an Indian tribe of northern Mexico. Reprint Glorieta, NM, Rio Grande Press 1976. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.

Cabrera Torres, J. J. and S. Pulido Méndez (2005). “El kuilichi prehispánico y sus reminiscencias actuales. Un juego de destreza entre los indígenas de Michoacán”. In: Arqueología (Mexico City) 35, pp. 138–147.

Culin, S. (1896). “Chess and Playing-cards”. In: Annual Report of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution … for the year ending June 30, 1896 (= Report of the U.S. National Museum) vol. ii, 1898, pp. 665–942. Reprint New York, 1976.

Culin, S. (1907). Games of the North American Indians. Washington, D.C. (24th Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology, 1902–1903). Reprint New York, 1975; 1986.

de Voogt, A., A.-E. Dunn-Vaturi, and J. W. Eerkens (2013). “Cultural transmission in the Ancient Near East: twenty squares and fifty-eight holes”. In: Journal of Archaeological Science 40.4, pp. 1715–1730.

Duverger, C. (1978). L’esprit du jeu chez les Aztèques. Civilisations et sociétés. Paris-La Haye-New York, Mouton.

Gallegos Gómora, M. J. (1994). “Un patolli prehispánico en Calakmul, Campeche”. In: Revista española de antropologia americana 24, pp. 9–24.

Gilberti, M. (2004). Arte de la lengua de Michuacán compilada por el muy reverendo Padre fray Maturino Gilberti. ed. C. Monzón. Zamora, El Colegio de Michoacán.

Gorenstein, S. S. (1996). “Western and Northwestern Mexico”. In: The Cambridge History of the Native Peoples of the Americas, II : Mesoamerica, Pt. 1. Ed. by Adams, R. E. W. and McLeod, M. J. Cambridge University Press, pp. 318–357.

Jerónimo de Alcalá (1970). The Chronicles of Michoacan. English version of Jerónimo de Alcalá 1988. University of Oklahoma Press.

Jerónimo de Alcalá (1988). La relación de Michoacán; versión paleográfica, estudio preliminar y notas del doctor Francisco Miranda. Zamora, El Colegio de Michoacán.

Kendall, T. (1980). Patolli: A Game of Ancient Mexico. Newton, MA, Kirk Game.

Kirchhoff, P. (1954). “Gatherers and farmers in the Greater Southwest: a problem in classification”. In: American Anthropologist (Special Southwest Issue) 56, pp. 529–550.

Kroeber, A. (1939). Cultural and Natural Areas of Native North America. Berkeley, University of California Press.

López Batista, R. (1992). “Romayá: un juego tarahumara, el ‘15’”. In: Nuestra Palabra (suppl. to El Nacional) 3rd year. 1, pp. 11–12.

Meadows, W. C. (2008). Kiowa Ethnogeography. Austin, University of Texas Press.

Mountjoy, J. (2006). “Algunos patollis abreviados encontrados entre los petrograbados de Jalisco”. In: Los petroglifos del Norte de México : memoria del Primer Seminario de Petrograbados del Norte de México. Ed. by V. J. S. Ramírez and R. V. Valverdú. Mexico City, Instituto Nacional de Antropologia e Historia, pp. 151–155.

Mountjoy, J. B. and J. P. Smith (1985). “An archaeological patolli from Tomatlán, Jalisco, Mexico”. In: Contributions to the archaeology and ethnohistory of Greater Mesoamerica: Essays in honor of Carroll L. Riley. Ed. by W. Folan. 240–262. Reprinted in: M.P. Casado López, L. Mirambell Silva (eds.), El arte rupestre en México : ensayos 1990–2004. Mexico City, INAH, 2005: 395–411.

Murray, H. (1952). A history of board games other than chess. Oxford, Oxford University Press. Reprint New York, 1978; Oxford, 2002.

Olmos Curiel, A. G. (2010). “Los petrograbados de Tzintzuntzan, Michoacán : un sistema de comunicación gráfica”. 4.5 El K’uilichi ch’anakua en Tzintzuntzan : cosmograma mesoamericano, 116–125. MA thesis. El Colegio de Michoacán.

Ortega Rangel, J. R. (n.d.). Ch’anakua tembini ka iumu: el juego del quince o los palillos. Morelia, Mich., Universidad Pedagógica Nacional. (accessed 17/02/2006, no longer online). url:

Pennington, C. W. (ed.) (1981). Arte y vocabulario de la lengua dohema, heve o eudeva (anónimo, siglo xvii). Mexico City, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

Pennington, C. W. (1963). The Tarahumar of Mexico: Their Environment and Material Culture. Utah, University of Utah Press.

Pennington, C. W. (1969). The Tepehuan of Chihuahua: Their Material Culture. Utah, University of Utah Press.

Pérez de Ribas, A. (1645). Historia de los triumphos de nuestra santa Fe entre gentes las más bárbaras. Triunfos de nuestra santa fe entre gentes las mas barbaras y fierasdel nuevo orbe: Por el padre Andres Perez de Ribas. Madrid.

Riley, C. L. (1995). Rio Del Norte: People of the Upper Rio Grande from Earliest Times to the Pueblo Revolt. Salt Lake City, University of Utah Press.

Scholes, F. V. (1935). “The first decades of the Inquisition in New Mexico”. In: New Mexico Historical Review x, pp. 195–241.

Smith, A. L. (1977). “Patolli, at the ruins of Seibal, Petén, Guatemala”. In: Social process in Maya prehistory. Studies in honour of Sir Eric Thompson. Ed. by N. Hammond. London-New York-San Francisco, Academic Press, pp. 349–363.

Smith, W. N. (1945). “The Papago game of “Gince goot”“. In: The Masterkey xix.6, pp. 194–197.

Soto Bravo, V. (1992). “K’uilichi : P’urhecheri tua anapu ch’anakua. Juego ancestral purépecha”. In: Nuestra Palabra (suppl. to El Nacional) 3rd year. 1, pp. 3–7.

Spier, L. (1928). Havasupai Ethnography. xxix, pt. iii. New York, Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History.

Spier, L. (1933). Yuman tribes of the Gila River. Chicago, University of Chicago Press. Reprint New York 1978.

Steffel, M. (1791). “Tarahumarisches Wörterbuch”. In: Nachrichten von verschiedenen Ländern des spanischen Amerika. Ed. by C. von Murr. Halle, 1809.

Swezey, W. and B. Bittman (1983). “El rectángulo de cintas y el patolli: nueva evidencia de la antigüedad, distribución, variedad y formas de practicar este juego precolombino”. In: Mesoamérica iv.6, pp. 373–416.

Williamson, R. (1996). “Excavations, interpretations, and implications of the earliest structures beneath structure 10L-26 at Copan, Honduras”. In: Eighth Palenque Round Table. Ed. by M. J. Macri and J. McHargue. San Francisco 1993, electronic version 1996, Pre-Columbian Art Research Institute.

Journal Information


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 114 114 114
PDF Downloads 98 98 98