Pente Grammai and the ‘Holy Line’

Open access

Abstract

A great deal of the literary evidence surrounding the ancient Greek board game pente grammai has to do with its central and proverbial ‘holy line’. Although it seems that the goal of the game was to reach this holy line, the proverb always refers to ‘moving away from’ this holy line not toward it. But why would players move away from the line which is the goal? This paper argues that there was a strategic element to the game: just like in modern backgammon and in Zeno’s ‘table’ game from late antiquity, in pente grammai a player could knock an opponent’s ‘blots’ (azuges) off the board. This explains why a player might make the odd move of leaving the holy line: the aggressive and risky act might bring an advantage if the opponent has left a number of vulnerable pieces exposed. At the end, a possible reconstruction of the game is offered.

Austin, R. (1934). “Zeno’s Game of τάβλη (A. P. ix. 482)”. In: The Journal of Hellenic Studies 54, pp. 202-205. - (1940). “Greek board-games”. In: Antiquity 14, pp. 257-71.

Bethe, E. (1919). “Julius Pollux”. In: RE 10, pp. 773-9. Colson, F. (1942). “ΚΙΝΕΙΝ ΤΟΝ ΑΦ᾽ ἹΕΡΑΣ’”. In: Classical Review 56.3, p. 116.

Effenterre, van (1995). “Cupules et naumachiae”. In: BCH 79, pp. 541-8. Hansen, M. (2002). “The game called Polis”. In: Even More Studies in the Ancient Greek Polis. Ed. by T. Nielsen. Stuttgart, pp. 9-15.

Herodianus, A., K. Hajdú, and D. Hansen (1998). Ps.-Herodian, De figuris / Das attizistische Lexikon des Moeris: Überlieferungsgeschichte und kritische Ausgabe / Quellenkritische Untersuchung und Edition. Sammlung griechischer und lateinischer Grammatiker. De Gruyter.

Hübner, R. (2009). “Der Begriff ἄζυξ beim Brettspiel”. In: …vor dem Papyrus sind alle Gleich! Ed. by S. P. R. Eberhard H. Kockelmann and M. Schentuleit. Berlin: Papyrologische Beiträge zu Ehren von Bärbel Kramer, pp. 80-92.

Kidd, S. (2012). “The Meaning of Bomolokhos in Classical Attic”. In: Transactions of the American Philological Association 142.2, pp. 239-55.

Kurke, L. (1999). Coins, Bodies, Games, and Gold: The Politics of Meaning in Archaic Greece. Princeton University Press.

Lamer, H. (1927). “Lusoria Tabula”. In: RE 13, pp. 1900-2029.

Laser, S. (1987). Sport und Spiel. Kritische Studien Zur Geschichtswissenschaft. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

Murray, H. (1913). A History of Chess. Oxford University Press. - (1952). A history of board-games other than chess. Oxford University Press.

Newman, W. (2010). Politics of Aristotle: With an Introduction, Two Prefatory Essays and Notes Critical and Explanatory. Cambridge Library Collection-Classics. Originally published in 1887-1902. Cambridge University Press.

Parlett, D. (1999). The Oxford History of Board Games. Oxford University Press.

Pauw, J. de (1726). Diatribe De Alea Veterum. Croon. Pollux, J. and E. Bethe (1900). Pollucis Onomasticon e codicibus ab ipso collatis denuo. Lexicographi graeci recogniti et apparatu critico instructi 3 vols. Teubner.

Pritchett, W. K. (1968). ““Five Lines” and IG I2 324”. In: California Studies in Classical Antiquity 1, pp. 187-215.

Rodríguez-Noriega Guillén, L. (1996). Epicarmo de Siracusa. Oviedo.

Schädler, U. (2008). “Pente Grammai-the ancient greek board game Five Lines”. In: Proceedings of the Board Game Studies Colloquium xi. Ed. by J. Silva. Associação Ludus, pp. 173-96.

Soles, C. de and F. Wehrli (1948). Die Schule des Aristoteles: Texte und Kommmentar. Vol. 4. Schwabe.

Sophron and J. Hordern (2004). Sophron’s Mimes. Oxford University Press.

Taillardat, J. (1967). Suétone: Περὶ βλασφημιῶν. Περὶ παιδιῶν. Extraits byzantins. Paris.

Theodorides, C. (1982-2013). Photii Patriarchae Lexicon. (3 vols.) Berlin.

Tosi, R. (2007). “Polluce: strutture onomastica e tradizione lessicografica”. In: ’L’Onomasticon di Giulio Polluce, Tra lessicografia e antiquaria. Ed. by F. L. C. Bearzot and G. Zecchini. Milan: V&P, pp. 3-16.

Wilson, N. (1996). Scholars of Byzantium. Duckworth.

Journal Information

Cited By

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 387 387 40
PDF Downloads 145 145 22