With the growing importance of digital practices in young children’s everyday routines, parents and educators often face frustration and confusion. They find it difficult to guide children when it comes to playing and learning online. This research note proposes an insight into parents’ and educators’ concerns related to children’s and their own digital literacy, based on two exploratory qualitative inquiries carried out from March 2015 to August 2017 among 30 children aged 4 to 8 from Romania, their parents and educators. The research project Digital and Multimodal Practices of Young Children from Romania (2015–2016) and its continuation The Role of Digital Competence in the Everyday Lives of Children Aged 4–8 (2017–2018, ongoing) are part of a broader effort within the Europe-wide COST network IS1410 – The Digital and Multimodal Practices of Young Children (2014–2018). Parents and educators are disconnected from young children’s universe, our research has found. The factors enabling adults’ access to “Digiland” and ways of coping with the steep learning curve of digital literacy are explored through parents’ and teachers’ narratives, guided observation of children’s digital practices, and expert testimonies.
Arrow, A. W.–Finch, B. T. (2013). Multimedia Literacy Practices in Beginning Classrooms and at Home: the Differences in Practices and Beliefs. Literacy 27(3): 131–141.
Bakó, R. K. (2014). Children Online: a Participatory Visual Approach. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Communicatio 1: 75–86.
Bakó, R. K. (2016). Digital Transition: Children in a Multimodal World. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Social Analysis 6(1): 145–154.
Blau, I.–Hameiri, M. (2016). Ubiquitous Mobile Educational Data Management by Teachers, Students and Parents: Does Technology Change School-Family Communication and Parental Involvement? Education and Information Technologies 21(3): 1–20.
Compton-Lilly, C.–Rogers, R.–Lewis, T. Y. (2012). Analyzing Epistemological Considerations Related to Diversity: an Integrative Critical Literature Review of Family Literacy Scholarship. Reading Research Quarterly 47(1): 33–60.
Fleer, M. (2014). The Demands and Motives Afforded through Digital Play in Early Childhood Activity Settings. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 3: 202–209.
Helsper, E. J.–Reisdorf, B. C. (2016). The Emergence of a ‘Digital Underclass’ in Great Britain and Sweden: Changing Reasons for Digital Exclusion. New Media and Society (online first) 19(8): 1253–1270. DOI: 10.1177/1461444816634676.
Jones, L. M.–Mitchell, K. J. (2016). Defining and Measuring Youth Digital Citizenship. New Media and Society 18(9): 2063–2079.
Kahne, J.–Middaugh, E. (2012). Digital Media Shapes Youth Participation in Politics. Kappan 94(3): 52–56.
Marsh, J.–Mascheroni, G.–Carrington, V.–Árnadóttir, H.–Brito, R.–Dias, R.–Kupiainen, R.–Trueltzsch-Wijnen, C. (2017). The Online and Offline Digital Literacy Practices of Young Children: a Review of the Literature. COST ACTION IS1410. www.digilitey.eu.
Marsh, J. (2011). Young Children’s Literacy Practices in a Virtual World: Establishing an Online Interaction Order. Reading Research Quarterly 46(2): 101–118.
Mäkinen, M. (2006). Digital Empowerment as a Process for Enhancing Citizen Participation. E-Learning 3(3): 381–395.
Nikken, P.–Jansz, J. (2014). Developing Scales to Measure Parental Mediation of Young Children’s Internet Use. Learning, Media and Technology 39(2): 250–266.
Plowman, L.–McPake, J.–Stephen, C. (2008). Just Picking It Up? Young Children Learning with Technology at Home. Cambridge Journal of Education 38: 303–319.
Silverstone, R.–Hirsch, E. (eds). (1992). Consuming Technologies: Media and Information in Domestic Spaces. London–New York: Routledge.
Tőkés, Gy. (2016). Visual Research to Study the Digital Literacy and Multimodal Practices of Romanian Pre-School Children. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Communicatio 3: 59–72.
Wellman, B.–Quan-Haase, A.–Boase, J.–Chen, W.–Hampton, K.–Díaz, I.–Myata, K. (2003). The Social Affordances of the Internet for Networked Individualism. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 8(3). DOI: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2003.tb00216.x.