Assessment of Commuter Satisfaction in the Usage of Bus-Shelters: the Ataköy Zone 5 and Beşyol Metrobus Stops, Istanbul

Open access


Bus shelters, which form a part of daily lives of people, generally provide service as small areas of urban space created for short-term periods of waiting. From the perspective of spatial design, it is important that an environment of good quality is provided for users of bus-shelters. This study proposed hypotheses to research how the physical design of bus shelters (location-accessibility, anthropometric characteristics, roofing and walls, lighting, electronic information, seating, etc.) affected general satisfaction of their users. To establish users’ general satisfaction, direct observation was performed and the hypotheses were tested through surveys conducted at bus-shelters selected in two areas of Istanbul (Ataköy-Beşyol) with different economic levels, and an assessment was made of the users’ satisfaction analyses and related problems of bus shelter design. In the conclusion, it was established that there is a significant correlation between general satisfaction and, among other things, the perceived degree of difficulty in getting on and off buses, the harmonization of bus shelter design with the surroundings, the adequacy of a shelter for summer use, the comfort of a shelter, the adequacy of seating, and the extent to which the shelter is maintained.

1. King, R.D. Bus occupant safety. Transportation Research Board, 1996. 56 p.

2. Road Service and Translink. Bus Stop Design Guide, Investor in People, 2005 [online, cited 22.05.2018].

3. Johnson, V.D., Ponnuswamy, S. Urban transportation: planning, operation and management. Tata McGraw-Hill Education, 2012. 272 p.

4. Zeeger, Ch.V. Pedestrian facilities users guide: Providing safety and mobility. diane publishing, 2002. 162 p.

5. Imperial County Transportation Commission [online]. Bus Stop Design and Safety Guideline Handbook [cited 22.05.2018]., 2017

6. Voigt, N. R. Transportation Depth Reference Manual for the Civil PE Exam, Professional Publications Inc; 2nd Second Edition, 2016, 350 p.

7. Transfort [online]. Bus Stop Design Standards & Guidelines [cited 22.05.2018].

8. Gattis, J. L. Guide for the geometric design of driveways. Transportation Research Board, 2010, 32 p.

9. Grava, S. Urban transportation systems. Choices for communities. 2003 [online, cited 22.05.2018]., 2004.

10. Pecheux, K. K. Guidebook for mitigating fixed-route bus-and-pedestrian collisions. Transportation Research Board, 2008. 65 p.

11. Zhang, K. J. Bus Stop Urban Design: Nine Techniques for Enhancing Bus Stops and Neighbourhoods and their Application in Metro Vancouver, B. Environment Design, Master Thesis, The University of British Columbia. 2012.

12. Foothill Goldline [online]. Bus Stop Location and Design Criteria,Chapter 3 | Proposed Bus/RAIL INTERFACE FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS, Foothill Extension Bus Interface Plan [cited 22.05.2018].

13. GMPTE. Greater Manchester Passenger Transport Executive, Design Guidelines for Bus Stops in Greater Manchester, Manchester, 2007 [online, cited 22.05.2018].

14. Septa Bus Stop Design Guidelines. City of Philadelphia, Bucks County, Chester County, Delaware County, Montgomery County, 2012 [online, cited 22.05.2018].

15. Bus Stop Design & Accessibility Guidelines, 2017. Memphis MPO Metropolitan Planning Organization [online, cited 22.05.2018].

16. BC Transit Municipal Systems Program, Design Guidelines for Accesible Bus Stops, 2013 [online]. Transit BC [cited 22.05.2018].

17. London, Mayor Of. Accessible bus stop design guidance. 2006 [online, cited 22.05.2018].

18. Tumlin, J. Sustainable transportation planning: Tools for creating vibrant, healthy, and resilient communities. John Wiley & Sons, 2012, 320 p.

19. Bus Stop Design Guide [online]. COTA (Central Ohıo Transıt Authorıty) [cited 22.05.2018]., 2014

21. Tysons Corner Urban Design Guidelines, A Fairfax County, Virginia, 2012 [online]. Urban Design Guidelines Advisory Group [cited 22.05.2018]. publication

22. Groene bushokjes in Eindhoven, Oprukkend groen verbinden [online, cited 22.05.2018].

23. Orange in roof and claw (Bus shelter by Peter Eisenman, Aachen, Germany) [online, cited 22.05.2018].

24. Strategic Planning Services and Infrastructure Management Services. Transport Stops, Shelters and Seating [online]. The City of Newcastle [cited 22.05.2018].

25. Chien, S. I., Qin, Zh. Optimization of bus stop locations for improving transit accessibility. Transportation planning and Technology, 2004, Vol. 27, Issue 3, pp. 211–227.

26. Loukaitou-Sideris, A. Hot spots of bus stop crime: The importance of environmental attributes. Journal of the American Planning association, 1999, Vol. 65, Issue 4, pp. 395–411.

27. Hart, T. C., Miethe, T. D. Street robbery and public bus stops: a case study of activity nodes and situational risk. Security Journal, 2014, Vol. 27, Issue 2, pp. 180–193.

28. Ibeas, Á., et al. Optimizing bus stop spacing in urban areas. Transportation research part E: logistics and transportation review, 2010, Vol. 46, Issue 3, pp. 446–458.

29. Liggett, R., Loukaitou-Sideris, A., Iseki, H. Bus stop-environment connection: do characteristics of the built environment correlate with bus stop crime? Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2001, Vol. 1760, pp. 20–27.

30. Ewing, R. Using a visual preference survey in transit design. Public Works Management & Policy, 2001, Vol. 5, Issue 4, pp. 270–280.

31. Law, Ph., Taylor, B. Shelter from the storm: Optimizing distribution of bus stop shelters in Los Angeles. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2001, Vol. 1753, pp. 79–85.

32. Fitzpatrick, K., et al. TCRP Report 19: Guidelines for the Location and Design of Bus Stops. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, 1996. 222 p. ISBN 0-309-06050-8 [online, cited 22.05.2018].

33. Broome, K., et al. Evaluation of flexible route bus transport for older people. Transport Policy, 2012, Vol. 21, pp. 85–91.

34. Woldeamanuel, M., Somers, A. When the Wait seems Longer: Assessing Quality Attributes of Bus Stops. TRB 95th Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers, 2016. 17 p. [online, cited 22.05.2018].

35. Buys, L., Miller, E. Conceptualising convenience: Transportation practices and perceptions of inner-urban high density residents in Brisbane, Australia. Transport Policy, 2011, Vol. 18, Issue 1, pp. 289–297.

36. Pizzato, G., Guimarães, L., Caten, C. The perception of pleasantness in a product of collective use : the bus shelter. Work, 2012, Vol. 41.Supplement 1, pp. 282–289 [cited 22.05.2018].

37. Ely, V. H. M. B., De Oliveira, J. M., Lodgsdon, L. A bus stop shelter evaluated from the user’s perspective. Work, 2012, Vol. 41.Supplement 1, pp. 1226–1233.

38. Nabors, D., et al. Pedestrian road safety audit guidelines and prompt lists. Washington, DC, U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Office of Safety, 2007, 128 p.

39. Nikolopoulou, M., Kleissl, J., Linden, P.F., Lykoudis, S. Pedestrians’ perception of environmental stimuli through field surveys: Focus on particulate pollution. Science of the total environment, 2011, Vol. 409, Issue 13, pp. 2493–2502.

40. Pereira, D.A.G., Faria, B.M.A., Goncalves, R.A.M., Carvalho, V.B.F., Prata, K.O., Saraiva, P.S., Navarro, T.P., Cunha-Filho, I. Relação entre força muscular e capacidade funcional em pacientes com doença arterial obstrutiva periférica: um estudo piloto. Jornal Vascular Brasileiro, 2011, Vol. 10, Issue 1, pp. 26–30 [online, cited 22.05.2018].

41. Iseki, H., Ringler A., Taylor B.D., Miller, M. and Smart, M. Evaluating Transit Stops and Stations from the Perspective of Transit Users, 2007 [online, cited 22.05.2018].

Journal Information


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 293 293 16
PDF Downloads 244 244 21