A Research on the Social Responsibility Efficiency of Chinese Listed Food Companies

Open access

Abstract

On the basis of establishing an input-output index system of listed food companies’ social responsibility, this paper uses the DEA model to assess 22 Chinese listed food companies’ social responsibility efficiency between 2014 and 2016. Results show that the social responsibility efficiency of Chinese listed food companies is generally lower and the average of the 22 companies is only 0.665. The social responsibility management in 81.80% of listed food companies is in a relatively ineffective state. There is a big room for improvement. In addition, the social responsibility efficiencies of listed companies with different sizes are quite different. The social responsibility efficiency of large-sized listed food company is obviously higher than that of the small and medium-sized. The study also shows that the social responsibility efficiencies of most listed food companies are in the stage of increasing returns to scale and more input would be necessary in order to achieve higher efficiency.

1. André, R. (2012). Assessing the accountability of the benefit corporation: will this new gray sector organization enhance corporate social responsibility? Journal of Business Ethics, 110(1), 133-150. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-012-1254-1.

2. Bowen, H. R., Gond, J. P., & Bowen, P. G. (1954). Social responsibilities of the businessman. American Catholic Sociological Review, 15(1), 42. DOI: 10.2307/3708003.

3. Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497-505. DOI: 10.2307/257850.

4. Clement, W. (1979). The royal commission on corporate concentration: comment. Canadian Public Policy, 5(1), 120-126. DOI: 10.2307/3550228

5. Cochran, P. L., & Wood, R. A. (2005). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Corporate Governance, 27(3), 129-138. DOI: 10.2307/255956.

6. Dodd, E. M. (1932). For whom are corporate managers trustees?. Harvard Law Review, 45(7), 1145-1163. DOI: 10.2307/1331697.

7. Fogler, H. R., & Nutt, F. (1975). A note on social responsibility and stock valuation. Academy of Management Journal, 18(1), 155-160. DOI: 10.2307/255635

8. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard - measure that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, (January-February), 71–79. DOI: 00178012.

9. Lopez, B. & Fornes, G. (2015). Corporate social responsibility in emerging markets: case studies of Spanish MNCs in Latin America. European Business Review. 27(2), 214-230. DOI:10.1108/EBR-03-2013-0053.

10. Peters, S. Miller, M., & Kusyk, S. (2011). How relevant is corporate governance and corporate social responsibility in emerging markets? Corporate Governance, 11(4), 429–445. DOI:/10.1108/14720701111159262.

11. Patten, D. M., Ren, Y. & Zhao, N. (2015). Standalone corporate social responsibility reporting in China: an exploratory analysis of its relation to legitimation. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal. 35 (1), 17-31. DOI:10.1080/1540496X.2015.1021594.

12. Sheldon, O. (1924). The Philosophy of Management. London: Sir Isaac Pit-man and Sons Ltd.

Acta Universitatis Cibiniensis. Series E: Food Technology

The Journal of „Lucian Blaga“ University of Sibiu

Journal Information

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 191 191 14
PDF Downloads 106 106 6