The rising demand for food quality as well as the crisis of food safety in recent years is increasing consumers’ consciousness of the safety of food they consume. This study analysed the willingness of workers in tertiary institutions to pay for safe buka foods using the Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta as a case study. The Contingency Valuation Method (CVM) was used to assess the Willingness-To-Pay (WTP) of a total of 250 members of staff in the University including teaching and non-teaching sampled for the study. The respondents’ were selected using a multistage simple random sampling technique. Data were collected with the aid of a structured questionnaire and analysed using descriptive statistics, and logit regression model. The study found that majority of the respondents’ are still within the economically active age group with a mean age of 40 years. The respondents have spent an average length of 7 years working in the University. The commuting time between the respondents’ home and the University is more than 30 min. Almost half of the respondents (46.8%) perceived foods from buka to be very unsafe for consumption. More than half (69.2%) of the respondents confirmed to have had food related ailments among which 57.8% were able to trace the ailment back to the buka foods they ate. An appreciable number of the respondents (83.2%) were willing to pay for the safety of buka foods with a mean WTP of ₦32.5 ($0.16) per plate on any of the buka foods reflecting the prevailing situations in Nigeria and valid exchange rates at the time the data were collected in 2015. The logit regression analysis revealed that bid amount, income, household size and commuting time were the significant factors influencing the probability of respondents’ WTP for buka foods safety. The study concludes that WTP for safe buka foods among the respondents is positive and recommends that the government through her regulatory agencies should help to enforce the necessary standards procedures that buka foods operators will follow to ensure the safety procedures. Buka foods operators on the other hands should abide to the set standards as consumers are willing to pay more to ensure that they consume safe food. The respondents should also be encouraged to maintain small household size so that they will be able to pay more for the safety offoods they consume as smaller household size tends to reduce their financial responsibility.
Akhter S., Yew T. S. (2015): Tourists’ Willingness to Pay for Marine Resource Conservation at Pulau Perhentian Marine Park, MalaysiaGreener Journal of Economics and Accountancy 4: 029–041. Doi. org/10.15580/GJEA.2015.2.012315012
Akinbode S. O. (2005): Consumption patterns, safety perception and willingness to pay for safety of street food in Ogun State. An unpublished thesis submitted to the Department of Agricultural Economics and Farm Management, FUNAAB, Ogun State. Nigeria.
Antle J. M. (2001): Economic Analysis of Food Safety. In: B. L. Gardner and G. C. Rausser (eds) Handbook of Agricultural Economics, Vol.1B (Chapter 19): 1083–1136.
Arowolo A. O., Agbonlahor M. U., Okuneye P. A., Soaga J. A. (2014): Adopting a Participatory Approach to Community Forests Management in Rural Nigeria. Global NEST Journal 16: 975–987.
Bergland O., Musser W., Musser I., Terry K. (1987): Optimal sampling intensities in close-ended contingent valuation methods. Draft Paper, Department of Agricultural Economics, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon.
Buzby J., Skees, J., Ready R. (1995): Using contingent valuation to value food safety: A Case Study of grapefruit and pesticide residues. In Caswell J. A. (Ed.): Valuing Food Safety and Nutrition, Westview Press, Boulder, CO, pp. 219–256.
Calia P., Strazzera E. (2000). Bias and Efficiency of Single vs. Double Bound Models for Contingent Valuation Studies: a Monte Carlo Analysis. Applied Economics 32: 1329–1336.
Cooper J. C. (1993): Optimal bid selection for dichotomous-choice contingent valuation surveys. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 24: 25–40.
Golan E, Kuckler F. (1999): Willingness to pay for food safety: Costs and benefits of accurate measures. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81: 1185–1991.
Gossner C. M., Schlundt J., Embarek P. B., Hird S., Lo-Fo-Wong D., Javier J., Beltran O., Teoh K. N., Tritscher A. (2009): The Melamine Incident: Implications for International Food and Feed Safety. Environmental Health Perspective 117: 1803–1808.
Hanemann W. M. (1984): Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66: 332–334.
Iragunima M. W. (2006): Fundamentals of primary health care. Port Harcourt: Paulimatex Printers.
Lee C. K. (1997): Valuation of Nature-based Tourism Resources Using Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Method. Tourism Management 18: 587–591.
Liu Y., Zeng Y., Yu X. (2009): Consumer Willingness to Pay for Food Safety in Beijing: A Case Study of Food Additives. Contributed Paper prepared for presentation at the International Association of Agricultural Economists Conference, Beijing, China, August 16–22, 2009.
Lappo A., Bjørndal T., Fernández-Polanco J., Lem A. (2015): Consumers’ Concerns and External Drivers in Food Markets. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular No. 1102, Rome
Oghenekohwo J. E. (2015): Pattern of Food Hygiene and Environmental Health Practices among Food Vendors in Niger Delta University, European Journal of Food Science and Technology 3: 24–40.
Okojie L. O., Akinwunmi J. A. (2010): Monetizing the Environmental Welfare Impact of Deforestation in Ogun State, Nigeria: The Contingent Valuation Approach, Journal of Humanities, Social Sciences and Creative Arts 5: 1–15.
Radam A., Cher L. Y., Shamsudin M. N., Mohamed Z., Selamat J. (2007): Consumers’ willingness to pay towards food safety: The case of meat consumption. Economic and Technology Management Review 2: 63–74.
Ready R. C., Buzby J. C, Hu D. (1996): Differences between Continuous and Discrete Contingent Value Estimates. Land Economics 72: 397–411.
Satin M (2008): Food Alert: The Ultimate Sourcebook for Food Safety, 2nd ed. Facts on File, Inc.
Sckokai P., Veneziani M., Moro D., Castellari E. (2014): Consumer willingness to pay for food safety: the case of mycotoxins in milk. Bio-based and Applied Economics 3: 63–81. DOI: 10.13128/BAE-12827
Spencer H. (1996): Consumer Willingness to Pay for Reduction in the Risk of Food poisoning in UK. Journal of Agricultural Economics 47: 403–420.
Tapsuwan S. (2005): Valuing the willingness to pay for environmental conservation and management: A case study of scuba diving levies in Moo Koh Similan Islands Marine National Park, Thailand. In: Proceedings of the 34th Australian Conference of Economists. ACE05: 34th Australian Conference of Economists, Melbourne, Australia, (1–28). 26–28 September 2005.
Wong S., Yuen K. Y. (2006): Avian influenza virus infections in humans. Chest129: 156–168.
World Health Organization (WHO) (2002): Global Strategy for Food Safety. WHO Geneva.
Yang D., Dane G., Timmermans H. (2013): Mixture-amount experiments for measuring consumer preferences of energy-saving adaptation strategies: principles and illustration. In: T. Vanoutrive and A. Verhetsel (eds.):“Smart transport networks: market structure, sustainability and decision making”, Nectar series on Transportation and Communication Networks Research, Edward Elgar, pp. 208–223.
Yu X., Abler D. (2009): The Demand for Food Quality in Rural China. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 91: 57–69.