Quality Protein Maize (Zea mays L.) (QPM) varieties have been developed by scientists at the Institute of Agricultural Research and Training in Nigeria. For these varieties to have significant impact, they must possess traits acceptable to farmers. A study was carried out to evaluate the agronomic and sensory traits of two Quality Protein Maize - ART-98-SW-6-OB (QPM1) and ILE-1-OB (QPM2), in comparison with ART-96-SW-1 (High Protein Maize) and SUWAN-1-SR (a popularly grown improved variety) in three maize growing communities of South West, Nigeria. Sixty (60) farmers comprising males and females were evaluated for six sensory parameters. The parameters tested were appearance, colour, flavour, texture, taste and overall acceptability. The results of the agronomic evaluation showed that there were no significant differences in the height of QPM varieties and HPM at harvest. QPM varieties gave the highest grain yield of 2.38t/ha for ART-98-SW-6OB and 2.36t/ha for ILE-1-OB. Sensory evaluation showed that when the maize varieties were processed into corn-soy milk, QPM corn-soy milk had the highest sensory scores for all sensory parameters tested. Quality Protein Maize varieties had high grain yield and were most preferred for maize pudding and corn - soy milk. The QPM varieties, if formulated into foods for household or commercial purposes, should have good chance of being accepted by farmers with continuous promotional campaigns.
Akalu G., Tafesse S., Tekabe F., Taye G., De Groote H., Gunaratna N., Debello A., Friesen D. (2008): Quality Protein Maize: Comparative studies on its nutritional benefits for pre-school children in maize consuming households in two Ethiopian communities. Technical report of the “Quality Protein Maize Development for The Horn and East Africa” (QPMD) Project prepared for the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA). Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Akinyele I.O. (2010): Ensuring Food and Nutrition Security in Rural Nigeria: An Assessment of the Challenges, Information Needs, and Analytical Capacity. Working paper.Nigeria Strategy Support Programme (NSSP). Background Paper No. NSSP 007.
Atlin G.N., Palacios N., Babu R., Twumasi-Afriye S., De Groote H., Vivek B., Friesen D., Pixley K.V. (2010): Quality Protein Maize: progress, impact, and prospects. Plant Breeding Reviews 34: 83-130.
Bhagavan N.V. (2002): Medical Biochemistry. 4th Edition Harcourt/Academic Press. 214 p.
Bressani R. (1992): Nutritional value of high-lysine maize in humans. In: Quality protein maize. St. Paul (MN): American Association of Cereal Chemists. 205 p.
Bryce D., Coitinho I., Darnton-Hill D., Pelletier, P. Pinstrup- Andersen P. (2008): Maternal and Child Undernutrition: Effective Action at National Level. Lancet 371 (9611): 510-526.
Edusei A.K., Asiedu M.S., Sakyi-Dawson E.O., Owusu W.B., Gunaratna N.S., Haag W.L. (2008): Capacity of quality protein maize (QPM) to improve nutritional status, serum proteins, hemoglobin level and leukocyte (WBC) counts of malnourished preschool children. Paper presented at the 4th International Maize HarvestPlus Meeting, Kumasi, Ghana, July7-11, 2008.
Gunaratna N.S., De Groote H., Nestel P., Pixley K.V., McCabe G.P. (2010): A Meta analysis of Community level Studies on Quality Protein Maize. Food Policy 35: 202-210.
Institute of Agricultural Research and Training (IAR&T) (2010): Guide on Maize Production. IAR&T Farmers’ Guide Series 1 No. 4, 7 p.
Iwe M.O. (2002): Handbook of Sensory Methods and Analysis. Rojoint Communication Services Limited, Enugu, Nigeria, pp. 71-72.
Kiria C.G., Vermeulen H., De Groote H. (2010): Sensory evaluation and Consumers’ willingness to pay for Quality Protein Maize (QPM) using Experimental Auctions in Rural Tanzania. 2010 AAAE Third Conference/AEASA 48th Conference, September 19-23, 2010, Cape Town, South Africa 96417, African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE) & Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA).
Larmond E. (1977): Laboratory methods for sensory evaluation of food. Research Branch Canadian Department of Agriculture Publication 1637.
Lauderdale J. (2000): Issues Regarding Targeting and Adoption of Quality Protein Maize(QPM). CIMMYT (International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center), Mexico D.F., 30 p.
Maziya-Dixon B., Akinyele I.O., Oguntona E.B., Nokoe S., Sanusi R.A., Harris E. (2004): Nigeria food consumption and nutrition survey 2001-2003. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Mertz E.T., Veron O.A., Bates L.S., Nelson O.E. (1965): Growth of Rats Fed on Opaque-2 Maize Science 148: 1741-1742.
Mbuya K., Nkongolo K.K., Kalonji-Mbuyi A., Kizungu R. (2010): Participatory selection and characterization of quality protein maize (QPM) varieties in Savanna agroecological region of DR-Congo. Journal of Plant Breeding and Crop Science 2(11): 325- 332.
NDHS (2008): National population commission and ICF Micro, Calverton. MD 20705, USA.
Nuss E.T., Tanumihardjo S.A (2011): Quality Protein Maize for Africa: Closing the protein Inadequacy gap in vulnerable populations. Advances in Nutrition 2: 217-224.
Olarinde L.O., Kuponiyi F.A. (2005): Rural livelihood and food consumption patterns among households in Oyo State, Nigeria: Implications for food security and poverty eradication in a deregulated economy. Journal of Social Science 11(2): 127-132.
Omueti O., Oguntona E.B., Jaiyeola O., Ashaye O.A. (2000): Nutritional Evaluation of home-level prepared soycorn milka protein beverage. Nutrition and Food Science 30: 128-132.
Prasanna B.M., Vasal S.K., Kassahun B., Singh N.N. (2001): Quality protein maize. Current Science 81:1308-1319.
Stevens R., Winter-Nelson A. (2008): Consumer acceptance of provitamin A biofortified maize in Maputo, Mozambique. Food Policy 33(4): 341-351.
Tomlins K., Sanni L., Oyewole O., Dipeolu A., Ayinde I., Adebayo K., Westby A. (2007): Consumer acceptability and sensory evaluation of a fermented cassava product (Nigerian fufu). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 87(10): 1949-1956.
Vasal S.K. (2000): The quality protein maize story. Food and Nutrition Bulletin 21: 445-450.