Possibilities of Psychological Intervention on Social Networks

Open access

Abstract

Introduction: Nowadays we are looking for help and answers to our questions more and more often on the Internet. People use social networks to search for communities or groups whose members experience similar difficulties. These are often online groups that focus on psychological problems, domestic violence, etc. Members receive instant feedback and at the same time, due to the online disinhibition effect, they do not feel the fear, shame or worries they would feel in personal contact (Griffiths, 2005). The content of such self-help groups is not always helpful, but may rather induce pathological behaviour. However, the group administrator can influence the atmosphere in the group and its content itself (Niwa & Mandrusiak, 2012).

Purpose: The purpose of this research was to find a space to perform professional psychological interventions inside online self-help groups on social networks. The concept of a field worker was used in this research. The field worker offers helping services to clients in an environment natural to them and where the worker can provide the client with emergency help during the crisis and prevent other clients from offering risk advices (Ambrózová, Vitálošová, & Labáth, 2006).

Methods: We have conducted qualitative research using the method of content-frequency analysis. The sample for this study consisted of 10 closed online self-help groups focusing on topics such as depression, anxiety disorder, domestic violence, self-injurious and suicidal thoughts and tendencies, etc. For the purpose of this research we created an online group moderated by professionals, focusing on similar topics of mental disorders.

Conclusions: The research results indicated that group members exchanged useful information (35.43%), described their current difficulties they were experiencing (32.33%), shared their own experiences (10.53%), and also published information on what had helped them manage the difficult feelings and situations they had been experiencing (6.39%). However, we also identified risky statements and threatening recommendations in posts and comments. Based on the results, we outlined the possibilities of online field worker interventions and described techniques of interventions that the professional can use for the benefit of group members.

Ambrózová A., Vitálošová I., & Labáth V. (2006). Proces terénnej sociálnej práce v sociálne vylúčenej komunite. Bratislava: Partner for Democratic Change Slovakia, o.z.

Boyd, D., Ryan, J., & Leavitt, A. (2010). Pro-self-harm and the visibility of youth - Generated problematic content. Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society, 7(1), 1-31.

Burnap, P., Colombo, G., & Scourfield, J. (2015). Machine Classification and Analysis of Suicide-Related Communication on Twitter. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM Conference on Hypertext & Social Media (pp. 75-84). Retrieved from https://orca.cf.ac.uk/76188/1/p75-burnap.pdf

Evans, E., Hawton, K., & Rodham, K. (2005). In what ways are adolescents who engage in self-harm or experience thoughts of self-harm different in terms of help-seeking, communication and coping strategies? Journal of Adolescence, 28(4), 573-587.

Fayard, A-L., & DeSanctis, G. (2005). Evolution of an online forum for knowledge management professionals: A language game analysis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(4).

Frost, M., & Casey, L. (2016). Who seeks help online for self-injury? Archives of suicide research, 20(1), 69-79.

Griffiths, M. (2005). Online therapy for addictive behaviors. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 8(6).

Hanuliaková, J., Hasajová, L., & Porubčanová, D. (2016). Stress of students and social-pathological phenomena. Acta Technologica Dubnicae, 6(3), 114-123. doi: 10.1515/atd-2016-0023

Horská B., Lásková A., & Ptáček L. (2010). Internet jako cesta pomoci. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON).

Houston, T. K., Cooper, L. A., & Ford, D. E. (2002). Internet support groups for depression: A 1-year prospective cohort study. The American Journal of Psychiatry. Retrieved from http://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/doi/full/10.1176/appi.ajp.159.12.2062

Juszczyk, S. (2015). Fields of impact of social media on youth – Methodological implications. Acta Technologica Dubnicae, 5(2), 80-86. doi: 10.1515/atd-2015-0066

Mátel, A. (2013). Metódy a prístupy v sociálnej práci. Nitra: Fakulta sociálnych vied a zdravotníctva UKF.

Madro, M. (2016). Postoje adolescentov k vyhľadaniu psychologickej pomoci cez internet. FPS-100581-14021.

Madro, M. (2017). Online terénna práca ako príleťitosť pre psychologickú intervenciu. FPS-222-14021.

Niederkrotenthaler, T., Reidenberg, D. J., Till, B., & Gould, M. S. (2014). Increasing help-seeking and referrals for individuals at risk for suicide by decreasing stigma. The role of mass media. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 47, 235-243.

Niwa, K., & Mandrusiak, M. N. (2012). Self-injury groups on Facebook. Canadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy, 46(1), 1-20.

Rickwood, D. J., Deane, F. P., & Wilson, C. J. (2007). When and how do young people seek professional help for mental health problems? The Medical Journal of Australia, 187(7), 35-39.

Swannell, S. V., Martin, G. E., Page, A., Hasking, P., & St. John, N. J. (2014). Prevalence of nonsuicidal self-injury in nonclinical samples: Systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 44(3), 273-303.

Welbourne, J., Blanchard, A. L., & Boughton, M. D. (2009). Supportive communication, sense of virtual community and health outcomes in online infertility groups. In Communities and Technology 2007: Proceedings of the Fourth Communities and Technologies Conference (pp. 31-40). Pennsylvania State University.

Whitlock, J. L., Lader, W., & Conterio, K. (2007). The internet and self-injury: What psychotherapists should know. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 63(11), 1135-1143.

Journal Information

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 69 69 35
PDF Downloads 51 51 29