Effects of Two Enzyme Feed Additives on Digestion and Milk Production in Lactating Egyptian Buffaloes

Tarek A. Morsy 1 , Ahmed E. Kholif 1 , Sobhy M. Kholif 1 , Abdelkader M. Kholif 1 , Xuezhao Sun 2  and Abdelfattah Z. M. Salem 3
  • 1 Dairy Science Department, National Research Centre, 33 Bohouth St., Dokki, Giza, Egypt
  • 2 Grasslands Research Centre, AgResearch Limited, Private Bag 11008, Palmerston North, New Zealand
  • 3 Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, México


The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of two commercial enzyme products on milk production in Egyptian buffaloes. Twenty-one lactating buffaloes (570±15 kg BW) were divided into three groups (n=7) in a randomized block design for four months. Buffaloes were fed a total mixed ration containing 60% forage [rice straw and berseem hay (Trifolium alexandrinum)] and 40% concentrates with either no enzymes added (Control) or an addition of 40 g of Veta-Zyme Plus® (VET) or 40 g of Tomoko® (TOM ) enzyme product per day for each buffalo. Enzyme addition did not affect feed intake (P>0.05), but increased the digestibility of nutrients (P<0.05) and serum glucose concentration (P=0.011). Furthermore, the addition of VET increased milk (P=0.017) and fat corrected milk (P=0.021) yields, fat content (P=0.045), total unsaturated fatty acid (P=0.045) and total conjugated linoleic acid (P=0.031) contents in milk and decreased the content of total saturated fatty acids (P=0.046), while the addition of TOM increased milk total protein (P=0.023) and true protein (P=0.031) contents. The two enzyme products both resulted in higher concentrations of lysine (P=0.045) and total essential amino acids (P=0.036) in milk. It was concluded that addition of commercial fibrolytic enzyme products (i.e. Veta-Zyme Plus® and Tomoko®) to the diet of early lactating buffaloes enhanced nutrient digestibility and milk production and quality.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Alsersy H., Salem A.Z.M., Borhami B.E., Olivares J., Gado H.M., Mariezcurre- na M.D., Yacuot M.H., Kholif A.E., El-Adawy M., Hernandez S.R. (2015). Effect of Mediterranean saltbush (Atriplex halimus) ensilaging with two developed enzyme cocktails on feed intake, nutrient digestibility and ruminal fermentation in sheep. Anim. Sci. J., 86: 51-58.

  • AOAC (1997). Official Methods of Analysis. Washington, DC., USA, Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 16th ed.

  • Aschaffenburg R., Drewry I. (1959). New procedure for the routine determination of the various non-casein-proteins of milk. Proc. XV International Dairy Congress, London, England, 29.6.1959, pp. 1631-1636.

  • Boyd J.W. (2011). The interpretation of serum biochemistry test results in domestic animals, In: Veterinary Clinical Pathology. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.,asubsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc. New Jersey, USA.

  • Duncan D.B. (1955). Multiple range and multiple Ftest. Biometrics, 11: 1-42.

  • Elghandour M.M.Y., Kholif A.E., Bastida A.Z., Martínez D.L.P., Salem A.Z.M. (2015 a). In vitro gas production of five rations of different maize silage and concentrate ratios influenced by increasing levels of chemically characterized extract of Salix babylonica. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci., 39: 186-194.

  • Elghandour M.M.Y., Kholif A.E., Márquez- Molina O., Vázquez- Armijo J.F., Puniya A.K., Salem A.Z.M. (2015 b). Influence of individual or mixed cellulase and xylanase mixtures on in vitro rumen gas production kinetics of total mixed rations with different maize silage and concentrate ratios. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci., 39: 435-442.

  • Elghandour M.M.Y., Vázquez Chagoyán J.C., Salem A.Z.M., Kholif A.E., Mar- tínez Castañeda J.S., Camacho L.M., Cerrillo-Soto M.A. (2014). Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae at direct addition or pre-incubation on in vitro gas production kinetics and degradability of four fibrous feeds. Ital. J. Anim. Sci., 13: 295-301.

  • Eun J.S., Beauchemin K.A., Schulze H. (2007). Use of an in vitro fermentation bioassay to evaluate improvements in degradation of alfalfa hay. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 35: 315-328.

  • FASS (1999). Guide for the care and use of agricultural animals in agricultural research and teaching. Champaign, IL, USA, Fed. Anim. Sci. Soc.

  • Ferret A., Plaixats J., Caja G., Gasa J., Prio P. (1999). Using markers to estimate apparent dry matter digestibility, faecal output and dry matter intake in dairy ewes fed Italian ryegrass hay or alfalfa hay. Small Ruminant Res., 33: 145-152.

  • Gado H.M., Salem A.Z.M., Robinson P.H., Hassan M. (2009). Influence of exogenous enzymes on nutrient digestibility, extent of ruminal fermentation as well as milk production and composition in dairy cows. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 154: 36-46.

  • Ip C., Banni S., Angioni E. (1999). Conjugated linoleic acid-enriched butter fat alters mammary gland morphogenesis and reduces cancer risk in rats. J. Nutr., 129: 2135-2142.

  • ISO-IDF (2002). Milk fat - preparation of fatty acid methyl esters International Standard ISO 15884-IDF 182: 2002.

  • Khattab H.M., Gado H.M., Kholif A.E., Mansour A.M., Kholif A.M. (2011). The potential of feeding goats sun dried rumen contents with or without bacterial inoculums as replacementfor berseem clover and the effects on milk production and animal health. Inter. J. Dairy Sci., 6: 267-277.

  • Kholif A.E., Khattab H.M., El-Shewy A.A., Salem A.Z.M., Kholif A.M., El-Sa - yed M.M., Gado H.M., Mariezcurrena M.D. (2014). Nutrient digestibility, ruminal fermentation activities, serum parameters and milk production and composition of lactating goats fed diets containing rice straw treated with Pleurotus ostreatus. Asian Austral. J. Anim. Sci., 27: 357-364.

  • Kholif S.M., Gado H., Morsy T.A., El-Bordeny N., Abedo A.A. (2012). Influence of exogenous enzymes on nutrient digestibility, blood composition, milk production and its composition as well as milk fatty acids profile in dairy buffaloes. Egyptian J. Nutr. Feeds, 15: 13-22.

  • Koba K., Akahoshi A., Yamasaki M. (2002). Dietary conjugated linolenic acid in relation to CLAdifferently modifies body fat mass and serum and liver lipid levels in rats. Lipids, 37: 343-350.

  • Kumar N.U., Singh B., Verma D.N. (1980). Effect of different levels of dietary protein and energy on growth of male buffalo calves. Indian. J. Anim. Sci., 51, p. 513.

  • Morgavi D.P., Beauchemin K.A., Nsereko V.L., Rode L.M., Mc Allister M., Wang Y. (2000). Atrichoderma feed enzyme preparation enhances adhesion of Fibrobacter succinogenes to complex substrates but not to pure cellulose. Proc. XVth Conference on Rumen Function, Chicago, IL, USA, 14-16.11.2000, p. 33.

  • NRC (2001). Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. Washington, DC, USA, National Academy Press, 7th revised ed.

  • Pariza M.W., Park Y., Cook M.E. (2001). The biologically active isomers of conjugated linoleic acid. Prog. Lipid Res., 40: 283-298.

  • Reeds P.J. (2000). Dispensable and indispensable amino acids for humans. J. Nutr., 130: 1835S-1840S.

  • Rojo R., Kholif A.E., Salem A.Z.M., Elghandour M.M.Y., Odongo N.E., Montes De Oca R., Rivera N., Alonso M.U. (2015). Influence of cellulase addition to dairy goat diets on digestion and fermentation milk production and fatty acid content. J. Agr. Sci. (Cambridge), 153: 1514-1523.

  • Ryder J.W., Portocarrero C.P., Song X.M. (2001). Isomer-specific antidiabetic properties of conjugated linoleic acid. Improved glucose tolerance, skeletal muscle insulin action, and UCP-2 gene expression. Diabetes, 50: 1149-1157.

  • Salem A.Z.M., Gado H.M., Colombatto D., Eghandour M.M.Y. (2013). Effect of exogenous enzymes on nutrient digestibility, ruminal fermentation and growth performance in beef steers. Livest. Sci., 154: 69-73.

  • Salem A.Z.M., Kholif A.E., Elghandour M.M.Y., Hernandez S.R., Domínguez- - Vara I.A., Mellado M. (2014). Effect of increasing levels of seven tree species extracts added toahigh concentrate diet on in vitro rumen gas output. Anim. Sci. J., 85: 853-860.

  • Salem A.Z.M., Alsersy H., Camacho L.M., El-Adawy M.M., Elghandour M.M.Y., Kholif A.E., Rivero N., Alonso M.U., Zaragoza A. (2015). Feed intake, nutrient digestibility, nitrogen utilization, and ruminal fermentation activities in sheep fed Atriplex halimus ensiled with three developed enzyme cocktails. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 60: 185-194.

  • Spackman D.H., Stein W.H., Moor S. (1958). Automatic recording apparatus for use in chromatography of amino acids. Anal. Chem. 30: 1190-1206.

  • Sutton J.D., Phipps R.H., Beever D.E., Humphries D.J., Hartnell G.F., Vicini J.L., Hard D.L. (2003). Effect of method of application ofafibrolytic enzyme product on digestive processes and milk production in Holstein-Friesian cows. J. Dairy Sci., 86: 546-556.

  • Valdes K.I., Salem A.Z.M., Lopez S., Alonso M.U., Rivero N., Elghandour M.M.Y., Domínguez I.A., Ronquillo M.G., Kholif A.E. (2015). Influence of exogenous enzymes in presence of Salix babylonica extract on digestibility, microbial protein synthesis and performance of lambs fed maize silage. J. Agr. Sci. (Cambridge), 153: 32-742.

  • Van Soest P.J., Robertson J.B., Lewis B.A. (1991). Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci., 74: 3583-3597.

  • Varga G.A. (2006). In vivo digestibility of forages. Proc. Tri-State dairy nutrition conference, The Ohio State University, Columbus-Fort Wayne, IN, USA, 25-26.04.2006, pp. 95-106.

  • Wang Y., Mc Allister T.A., Rode L.M., Beauchemin K.A., Morgavi D.P., Nsere- ko V.L., Iwaasa A.D., Yang W. (2001). Effects of an exogenous enzyme preparation on microbial protein synthesis, enzyme activity and attachment to feed in the rumen simulation technique (Rusitec). Br. J. Nutri., 85: 325-332.

  • Yang M., Cook M.E. (2003). Dietary conjugated linoleic acid decreased cachexia, macrophage tumor necrosis factor-alpha production, and modifies splenocyte cytokines production. Exp. Biol. Med., 228: 51-58.

  • Yang W.Z., Beauchemin K.A., Rode L.M. (1999). Effects of an enzyme feed additive on extent of digestion and milk production of lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 82: 391-403.


Journal + Issues