Determinants Of Dominance, Resting Place And Neighbour Preferences In Wrzosówka Polska Ewes Kept Indoors

Marcin T. Górecki 1  and Natalia Dziwińska 1
  • 1 Department of Zoology, Institute of Zoology, Poznań University Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 71C, 60-625 Poznań, Poland


The aim of this study was to recognize features determining social hierarchy in Wrzosówka Polska ewes kept indoors as well as to investigate their resting place and companionship preferences. Observations (156 hours in total) were carried out in a group of 22 ewes. The social rank of sheep was determined by their age, body weight and length of horns. Social position was positively correlated with aggressive behaviour performed and negatively with aggressive behaviour received. Use of space while resting was influenced by ewe social behaviour; aggressive individuals lied more often in attractive places, namely against walls and fodder troughs compared to other animals. In general, the ewes rested by having physical contact with animals of similar rank and aggressiveness. Kinship appeared not to be important in neighbour preference. As can be concluded, social interactions influenced the use of space and neighbourhood in ewes

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Altmann J. (1974). Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour, 49: 227-267.

  • Arnold G.W., Maller R.A. (1974). Some aspects of competition between sheep for supplementary feed. Anim. Prod., 19: 309-319.

  • Baranowski P. (1998). Chosen imported and native breeds and varieties of sheep - history of their origin (in Polish). Akademia Rolniczaw Szczecinie, Szczecin, Poland, 29 pp.

  • Barroso F.G., Alados C.L., Boza J. (2000). Social hierarchy in the domestic goat: Effect on food habits and production. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 69: 35-53.

  • Beilharz R.G., Zeeb K. (1982). Social dominance in dairy cattle. Appl. Anim. Ethol., 8: 79-97.

  • Bennett B. (1986). Social dominance in female bighorn sheep. Zoo Biol., 5: 21-26.

  • Bøe K.E., Andersen I.L. (2010). Competition, activity budget and feed intake of ewes when reducing the feed space. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 125: 109-114.

  • Bøe K.E., Berg S., Andersen I.L. (2006). Resting behaviour and displacements in ewes - effects of reduced lying space and pen shape. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 98: 249-259.

  • Bon R., Dardaillon M., Estevez I. (1993). Mating and lambing periods as related to age of female mouflon. J. Mammal., 74: 752-757.

  • Chrupek D., Groberek J., Niżnikowski R., Brzostowski H., Strzelec E., Popie- larczyk D., Marciniec M. (2006). Characteristic of Polish heath sheep grazing behaviour on fallow lands during vegetative period, concerning pasturage time and weather conditions. Arch. Tierzucht, 49 (SI): 353-358.

  • Clutton- Brock T.H., Pemberton J.M., Coulson T., Stevenson I.R., Mac Coll A.D.C. (2004). The sheep of St Kilda. In: Soay sheep. Dynamics and selection in an island population, Clutton- -Brock TH., Pemberton J.M. (eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 17-51.

  • Clutton- Brock T.H., Price O.F., Albon S.B., Jewell P.A. (1992). Early development and population fluctuations in Soay sheep. J. Anim. Ecol., 61: 381-396.

  • Côté S.D. (2000). Dominance hierarchies in female mountain goats: stability, aggressiveness and determinants of rank. Behaviour, 137: 1541-1566.

  • Dove H., Beilharz R.G., Black J. (1974). Dominance patterns and positional behaviour of sheep in yards. Anim. Prod., 19: 157-168.

  • Dýrmundsson Ó.R., Niznikowski R. (2010). North European short-tailed breeds of sheep: a review. Animal, 4: 1275-1282.Eccles T.R., Shackleton D.M. (1986). Correlates and consequences of social status in female bighorn sheep. Anim. Behav., 34: 1392-1401.

  • Erhard H.W., Fàbrega E., Stanworth G., Elston D. (2004). Assessing dominance in sheep inacompetitive situation: level of motivation and test duration. Appl. Anim. Behav Sci., 85: 277-292.

  • Færevik G., Andersen I.L., Bøe K.E. (2005). Preference of sheep for different types of pen flooring. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 90: 265-276.

  • Favre M., Martin J.G.A., Festa- Bianchet M. (2008). Determinants and life-history consequences of social dominance in bighorn ewes. Anim. Behav., 76: 1373-1380.

  • Festa- Bianchet M. (1988). Age-specific reproduction of bighorn ewes in Alberta, Canada. Can. J. Mammal., 69: 157-60.

  • Festa- Bianchet M. (1991). The social system of bighorn sheep: grouping patterns, kinship and female dominance rank. Anim. Behav., 42: 71-82.

  • Geist V. (1971). Mountain sheep:astudy in behavior and evolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, USA, 383 pp.

  • Górecki M.T. (2004). Hierarchy inagroup of domestic goat (Capra hircus) females. EJPAU, 7, 2.

  • Gräser - Hermann Ch., Sambraus H.H. (2001). The social behaviour of East Friesian dairy sheep in larger groups. Arch. Tierzucht, 44: 421-433.

  • Guilhem C., Bideau E., Gerard J.F., Maublanc M.L. (2000). Agonistic and proximity patterns in enclosed mouflon (Ovis gmelini) ewes in relation to age, reproductive status and kinship. Behav. Processes, 50: 101-112.

  • Guilhem C., Gerard J.F., Bideau E. (2002). Rank acquisition through birth order in mouflon sheep (Ovis gmelini) ewes. Ethology, 108: 63-73.

  • Hass C.C. (1991). Social status in female bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis): expression, development and reproductive correlates. J. Zool. Lond., 225: 509-523.

  • Hinch G.N., Lynch J.J., Elwin R.L., Green G.C. (1990). Long term associations between Merino ewes and their offspring. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 27: 93-103.

  • Jørgensen G.H.M., Andersen I.L., Bøe K.E. (2009). The effect of different pen partition configurations on the behaviour of sheep. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 119: 66-70.

  • Lawrence A.B. (1990). Mother-daughter and peer relationships of Scottish hill sheep. Anim. Behav., 39: 481-486.

  • Lobato J.F.P., Beilharz R.G. (1979). Relation of social dominance and body size to intake of supplements in grazing sheep. Appl. Anim. Ethol., 5: 233-239.

  • Locati M., Lovari S. (1991). Clues for dominance in female chamois: age, weight, or horn size? Agg. Behav., 17: 11-15.

  • Lynch J.J., Hinch G.N., Adams D.B. (1992). The behaviour of sheep: biological principles and implications for production. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, 237 pp.

  • Lynch J.J., Wood - Gush D.G.M., Davies H.I. (1985). Aggression and nearest neighbours in a flock of Scottish Blackface ewes. Biol. Behav., 10: 215-225.

  • Marsden M.D., Wood - Gush D.G.M. (1986). The use of space by group housed sheep. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 15, p. 178.

  • Niżnikowski R., Popielarczyk D., Strzelec E., Brudka G. (2007). Level of reproduction traits of highly-prolific Polish Heath sheep used in the rare breeds conservation program (in Polish). Ann. UMCS EE, 25: 109-117.

  • Preston B.T., Stevenson I.R., Pemberton J.M., Coltman D.W., Wilson K. (2003). Overt and covert competition inapromiscuous mammal: the importance of weaponry and testes size to male reproductive success. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 270: 633-640.

  • Pretorius P.S. (1970). Effect of aggressive behaviour on production and reproduction in the Angora goat (Capra hircus Angoraensis). Agroanimalia, 2: 161-164.

  • Sambraus H.H. (1971). The social behaviour of domesticated goats (in German). Z. Säugetierkunde, 36: 220-224.

  • Sambraus H.H. (1975). Observations and reflections on the social order of cattle (in German). Züchtungskunde, 47: 8-14.

  • Shank C.C. (1972). Some aspects of social behaviour inapopulation of feral goats. Z. Tierpsychol., 30: 488-528.Sherwin C.M., Johnson K.G. (1987). The influence of social factors on the use of shade by sheep. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 18: 143-155.

  • Stevenson I.R., Marrow P., Preston B.T., Pemberton J.M., Wilson K. (2004). Adaptive reproductive strategies. In: Soay sheep. Dynamics and selection in an island population, Clutton- Brock TH., Pemberton J.M. (eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 243-275.

  • Stolba A., Hinch G.N., Lynch J.J., Adams D.B., Munro R.K., Davies H.I. (1990). Social organization of Merino sheep of different ages, sex and family structure. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 8: 243-252.

  • Synnot A.L., Fulkerson W.J. (1984). Influence of social interactions between rams on their serving capacity. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 11: 283-289.

  • Sztych D., Sierańska B. (1994). Post-parturient behaviour of ewes and lambs of Heath Sheep (in Polish). Zesz. Nauk. PTZ, 13: 117-124.

  • Van Dierendonck M.C.,de Vries H., Schilder M.B.H., Colenbrander B., Þorh - allsdóttir A.G., Sigurjónsdóttir H. (2009). Interventions in social behaviour inaherd of mares and geldings. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 116: 67-73.


Journal + Issues