In Vitro Cellulase Production from Five Herbivore Microbial Ecosystems and Consortia

Fabian Nde Fon 1 , Ignatius Verla Nsahlai 2 , Peter Frank Scogings 1  and Nasreldin Abdelrahim Dafaalla Basha 2 , 3
  • 1 Department of Agriculture, University of Zululand, KwaDlangezwa, Empangeni, 3886, South Africa
  • 2 Animal and Poultry Science, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg Campus, Durban Road, Pietermaritzburg, 3201, South Africa
  • 3 Department of Animal Nutrition, Shampat Campus, University of Khartoum, P.O.Box 32, Postal Code 1334, Sudan

Abstract

As the most abundant biomass in nature, cellulose is the main chemical component in herbivore forages. The energy locked in these complex polymers can only be released by cellulolytic enzymes. Therefore, research aiming to increase the expression of cellulolytic enzymes or browsing uncultured microbial ecosystem in search of potential fibrolytic enzymes is imperative. The main objectives were to: (a) investigate the variation of cellulase enzymes in cow (CW), horse (H), miniature horse (mH), wildebeest (WB) and zebra (ZB); and (b) identify their presence and activeness in microbial consortia, N1 (H+WB), N2 (H+ZB), N3 (WB+ZB) and N4 (H+WB+ZB). Fresh faecal or rumen inocula were cultured in the laboratory on maize stover and lucerne (1:1) with salivary buffer for 72 h at 38°C. Crude proteins (CPZ) were precipitated from both fresh and cultured inocula using 60% ammonium sulfate for enzyme assays and zymography. Endocellulases and their activity were identified on 1% (m/v) carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) zymograms stained with Congo red. All CPZ extracts were active as reducing sugars were produced after incubation with crystalline cellulose, CMC and xylan. The number and types of proteins with endocellulase activity varied (P<0.05) among and within the different animal species CW (15), H (14), mH (14), WB (13) and ZB (13). Microbial consortia were active with relatively higher number of endocellulases, N1 (17), N3 (14), N4 (14), and N2 (13). Cellulase enzymes vary among and within herbivore species grazing on the same or different fields. Therefore, identifying specific enzymes and microbes with higher fibrolytic potentials from different ecosystems for transinoculation could play a vital role in improving forage digestibility in ruminants

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Arriola K.G., Kim S.C., Staples C.R., Adesogan A.T. (2011). Effect of fibrolytic enzyme application to low- and high-concentrate diets on the performance of lactating dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci., 94: 832-841.

  • Bala P., Malik R., Srinivas B. (2009). Effect of fortifying concentrate supplement with fibrolytic enzymes on nutrient utilization, milk yield and composition in lactating goats. Anim. Sci. J., 80: 265-272.

  • Beauchemin K.A., Colombatto D., Morgavi D.P., Yang W.Z. (2003). Use of exogenous fibrolytic enzymes to improve feed utilization by ruminants. J. Anim Sci., 81: 37-47.

  • Beguin P. (1983). Detection of cellulase activity in polyacrylamide gels using congo red-stained agar replicas. Anal. Biochem., 131: 333-336.

  • Bhat M.K. (2000). Cellulases and related enzymes in biotechnology. Biotechnol. Adv., 18: 355-383.

  • Blum H., Beier H., Gross H.J. (1987). Improved silver staining of plant-proteins, RNAand DNA in polyacrylamide gels. Electrophoresis, 8: 93-99.

  • Bronnenmeier K., Kundt K., Riedel K., Schwarz W.H., Staudenbauer W.L. (1997). Structure of the Clostridium stercorarium gene cel Yencoding the exo-1,4-beta-glucanase Avicelase II. Microbiology, 143: 891-898.

  • Clarke A.J., Drummelsmith J., Yaguchi M. (1997). Identification of the catalytic nucleophile in the cellulase from Schizophyllum commune and assignment of the enzyme to Family 5, subtype 5 of the glycosidases. FEBS Lett., 414: 359-361.

  • Colombatto K.A., Beauchemin D. (2003). Aproposed methodology to standardize the determination of enzymic activities present in enzyme additives used in ruminant diets. Can. J. Anim. Sci., 83: 559-568.

  • Dodia M.S., Rawal C.M., Bhimani H.G., Joshi R.H., Khare S.K., Singh S.P. (2008). Purification and stability characteristics of an alkaline serine protease fromanewly isolated Haloalkaliphilic bacterium sp AH-6. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 35: 121-131.

  • Duan C.J., Feng J.X. (2010). Mining metagenomes for novel cellulase genes. Biotechnol. Lett., 32: 1765-1775.

  • Ferrer M., Golyshina O.V., Chernikova T.N., Khachane A.N., Reyes- Duarte D., Dos Santos V., Strompl C., Elborough K., Jarvis G., Neef A., Yakimov M.M., Timmis K.N., Golyshin P.N. (2005). Novel hydrolase diversity retrieved fromametagenome library of bovine rumen microflora. Environ. Microbiol., 7: 1996-2010.

  • Gal L., Pages S., Gaudin C., Belaich A., Reverbel - Leroy C., Tardif C., Belaich J.P. (1997). Characterization of the cellulolytic complex (cellulosome) produced by Clostridium cellulolyticum. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 63: 903-909.

  • Hall J., Ali S., Surani M.A., Hazelwood G.P., Clark A.J., Simons J.P., Hirst B.H., Gilbert H.J. (1993). Manipulation of the repertoire of oligestive enzymes secreted into the gastrointestinal tract of transgenic mice. Nat. Biotechnol., 11: 376-379.

  • Heussen C., Dowdle E.B. (1980). Electrophoretic analysis of plasminogen activators in polyacrylamide gels containing sodium dodecyl sulfate and copolymerized substrates. Anal. Biochem., 102: 196-202.

  • Kim D., Baik K., Park S., Kim S.-J., Shin T.-S., Jung S.-J., Oh M.-J., Seong C. (2009). Cellulase production from Pseudoalteromonas sp. NO3 isolated from the sea squirt Halocynthia rorentzi. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 36: 1375-1382.

  • Laemmli U.K. (1970). Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature (London), 227: 680-685.Miller G.L. (1959). Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal. Chem., 31: 426-428.

  • Mo rgavi D., Beauchemin K., Nsereko V., Rode L., Mc Allister T., Iwaasa A., Wang Y., Yang W. (2001). Resistance of feed enzymes to proteolytic inactivation by rumen microorganisms and gastrointestinal proteases. J. Anim Sci., 79: 1621-1630.

  • Najmudin S., Guerreiro C.I.P.D., Carvalho A.L., Prates J.A.M., Correia M.A.S., Alves V.D., Ferreira L.M.A., Romão M.J., Gilbert H.J., Bolam D.N., Fon- tes C.M.G.A. (2006). Xyloglucan is recognized by carbohydrate-binding modules that interact with beta-glucan chains. J. Biol. Chem., 281: 8815-8828.

  • O ’ Connor - Robison C.I., Nielsen B.D., Morris R. (2007). Cellulase supplementation does not improve the digestibility ofahigh-forage diet in horses. J. Equine Vet. Sci., 27: 535-538.

  • Oakley B.R., Kirsch D.R., Morris N.R. (1980). Asimplified ultrasensitive silver stain for detecting proteins in polyacrylamide gels. Anal. Biochem., 105: 361-363.

  • Percival Zhang Y.H., Himmel M.E., Mielenz J.R. (2006). Outlook for cellulase improvement: Screening and selection strategies. Biotechnol. Adv., 24: 452-481.

  • Peters A., Lebzien P., Meyer U., Borchert U., Bulang M., Flachowsky G. (2010). Effect of exogenous fibrolytic enzymes on ruminal fermentation and nutrient digestion in dairy cows. Arch. Anim. Nutr., 64: 221-237.

  • Tilley J.M.A., Terry R.A. (1963). Atwo-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. J. Br. Grassl. Soc., 18: 104-111.

  • Titi H.H., Tabbaa M.J. (2004). Efficacy of exogenous cellulase on digestibility in lambs and growth of dairy calves. Livest. Prod. Sci., 87: 207-214.

  • Yang H.J., Xie C.Y. (2010). Assessment of fibrolytic activities of 18 commercial enzyme products and their abilities to degrade the cell wall fraction of corn stalks in in vitro enzymatic and ruminal batch cultures. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 159: 110-121.

OPEN ACCESS

Journal + Issues

Search