The Effect of Aromatized Environmental Enrichment in Pen on Social Relations and Behavioural Profile of Newly Mixed Weaners

Jacek Nowicki 1  and Czesław Klocek 1
  • 1 Department of Swine and Small Ruminants Breeding, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Al. Mickiewicza 24/28, 30-059 Kraków, Poland

The Effect of Aromatized Environmental Enrichment in Pen on Social Relations and Behavioural Profile of Newly Mixed Weaners

The aim of this study was to determine the influence of the presence of aromatized environmental enrichment elements in pen for weaners in newly created groups on the daily behavioural profile and their social hierarchy (time taken to establish hierarchical relationships, aggression level). The subject of the study were 72 weaners. After weaning piglets coming from two different litters were joined together and later 6 animals were placed in two adjacent pens (1.6 m x 2.2 m). One of the pens was additionally supplied with an aromatized element such as a chew toy enabling weaners to play. The behaviour was recorded for 72 hours after weaning and for 24 hours 14 days after weaning and the creation of the groups. The study was repeated 6 times. The following data was gathered: duration of activity and, specifically, duration of feed intake, duration and frequency of fights, duration and frequency of interest in toy in groups where the toy was present, and finally duration of rest. The presence of an aromatized toy in a pen decreased the level of aggression in weaners in the first days after weaning. Suitable selection of features of an additional object enriching the environment of a pen after animal weaning may significantly contribute to mitigation of fighting and aggression during the establishment of social hierarchy.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Arey D. S. (1993). The effect of bedding on the behaviour and welfare of pigs. Anim. Welfare, 2: 235-246.

  • Arey D. S., Franklin M. F. (1995). Effects of straw and unfamiliarity on fighting between newly mixed growing pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 45: 23-30.

  • Beattie V. E., O'Connell N. E., Moss B. W. (2000). Influence of environmental enrichment on the behaviour, performance and meat quality of domestic pigs. Livest. Prod. Sci., 65: 71-79.

  • Beattie V. E., Walker N., Sneddon I. A. (1995). Effects of environmental enrichment on behavior and productivity of growing pigs. Anim. Welfare., 4: 207-220.

  • Blackshaw J. K., Thomas F. J., Lee J. A. (1997). The effect of a fixed or free toy on the growth rate and aggressive behavior of weaned pigs and the influence of hierarchy on initial investigation of the toys. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 53: 203-212.

  • Commission Directive 2001/93/EC of 9 November 2001 amending Directive 91/630 EEC laying down minimum standards for the protection of pigs (2001), Official Journal of the European Community, 1.12.2001.

  • Croney C. C., Adams K. M., Washington C. G., Stricklin W. R. (2003). A note on visual, olfactory and spatial cue use in foraging behaviour of pigs: Indirectly assessing cognitive abilities. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 83: 303-308.

  • Day J. E. L., Spoolder H. A. M., Burfoot A., Chamberlain H. L., Edwards S. A. (2002). The separate and interactive effects of handling and environmental enrichment on the behaviour and welfare of growing pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 75: 177-192.

  • Day J. E. L., Spoolder H. A. M., Edwards S. A. (2001). Straw as environmental enrichment: which properties do growing pigs find behaviourally rewarding? Proc. International Symposium of the C. I. G. R. Animal Welfare Considerations in Livestock Housing Systems, 2nd Technical Section, pp. 157-167.

  • Fraser D. (1984). The role of behaviour in swine production: a review of research. Appl. Anim. Ethol., 11: 317-339.

  • Fraser D., Phillips P. A., Thompson B. K., Tennessen T. (1991). Effects of straw on the behavior of growing pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 30: 307-318.

  • Hafez E. S. E. (1975). Editor. The behaviour of domestic animals. Bailliere-Tindall, London, p. 301.

  • Hendriks H. J. M., Pedersen B. K., Vermeer H. M., Wittmann M. (1998). Pig housing systems in Europe: Current distributions and trends. Pig News Inform., 19: 97N-104N.

  • Jones J. B., Wathes C. M., White R. P., Jones R. B. (2000). Do pigs find a familiar odorant attractive in novel surroundings? Appl. Anim. Beh. Sci., 70: 115-126.

  • Keeling L. J., Gonyou H. W. (2001). Social behaviour in farm animals. CAB International, pp. 147-157.

  • Kelly H. R. C., Bruce J. M., English P. R., Fowler V. R., Edwards S. A. (2000). Behaviour of 3-week weaned pigs in Straw-Flow, deep straw and flat-deck housing systems. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 68: 269-280.

  • Lyons C. A. P., Bruce J. M., Fowler V. R., English P. R. (1995). A comparison of productivity and welfare of growing pigs in four intensive systems. Livest. Prod. Sci., 43: 265-274.

  • Meese G. B., Conner D. J., Baldwin B. A. (1975). Ability of the pig to distinguish between conspecific urine samples using olfaction. Physiol. Behav., 15: 121-125.

  • Mench J. A. (1998). Environmental enrichment and the importance of exploratory behaviour. In: Second Nature: Environmental Enrichment for Captive Animals, Sheperdon D. J., Mellen, J. D., Hutchins M. (Eds.). Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp. 30-46.

  • Merlot E., Meunier-Salaün M. C., Prunier A. (2004). Behavioral, endocrine and immune consequences of mixing in weaned piglets. Appl. Anim. Beh. Sci., 85: 247-257.

  • Newberry R.C (1995). Environmental enrichment: increasing the biological relevance of captive environments. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 44: 229-243.

  • Nowicki J., Kopyra M., Klocek C. (2007). The behavioural reaction of weaners to hanging toys: wooden ball and aromatized wooden ball - way to reduce aggression after mixing. J. Cent. Eur. Agri., 4: 447-452.

  • Pearce G. P., Paterson A. M. (1993). The effect of space restriction and provision of toys during rearing on the behaviour, productivity and physiology of male pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 36: 11-28.

  • Pearce G. P., Paterson A. M., Pearce A. N. (1989). The influence of pleasant and unpleasant handling and the provision of toys on the growth and behaviour of male pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 23: 27-37.

  • Petersen V. (1994). The development of feeding and investigatory behaviour in free-ranging domestic pigs during their first 18 weeks of life. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 42: 87-98.

  • Petersen V., Simonsen H. B., Lawson L. G. (1995). The effect of environmental stimulation on the development of behaviour in pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 45: 215-224.

  • Ruiterkamp W. A. (1987). The behaviour of grower pigs in relation to housing systems. Neth. J. Agric. Sci., 35: 67-70.

  • Scott K., Taylor L., Gill B. P., Edwards S. A. (2006). Influence of different types of environmental enrichment on the behaviour of finishing pigs in two different housing systems. 1. Hanging toy versus rootable substrate. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 99: 222-229.

  • Van de Weerd H. A., Docking C. M., Day J. E. L., Avery P. J., Edwards S. A. (2003). A systematic approach towards developing environmental enrichment for pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 84: 101-118.

  • Van de Weerd H. A., Docking C. M., Day J. E. L., Breuer K., Edwards S. A. (2006). Effects of species relevant environmental enrichment on the behaviour and productivity of finishing pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 99: 230-247.

  • Van de Weerd H. A., Docking C. M., Day J. E. L., Edwards S. A. (2005). The development of harmful social behaviour in pigs with intact tails and different enrichment backgrounds in two housing systems. Anim. Sci., 80: 289-298.

  • Young R. J., Carruthers J., Lawrence A. B. (1994). The effect of a foraging device (The ‘Edinburgh Football’) on the behaviour of pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 39: 237-247.


Journal + Issues