Perception of Mixture of Musical Instruments with Spectral Overlap Removed

Open access

Abstract

The issue of auditory segregation of simultaneous sound sources has been addressed in speech research but was given less attention in musical acoustics. In perception of concurrent speech, or speech with noise, the operation of time-frequency masking was often used as a research tool. In this work, an ex- tension of time-frequency masking, leading to the removal of spectro-temporal overlap between sound sources, was applied to musical instruments playing together. The perception of the original mixture was compared with the perception of the same mixture with all spectral overlap electronically removed. Ex- periments differed in the method of listening (headphones or a loudspeaker), sets of instruments mixed, and populations of participants. The main findings were: (i) in one of the experimental conditions the removal of spectro-temporal overlap was imperceptible, (ii) perception of the effect increased when removal of spectro-temporal overlap was performed in larger time-frequency regions rather than in small ones, (iii) perception of the effect decreased in loudspeaker listening. The results support both the multiple looks hypothesis and the “glimpsing” hypothesis known from speech perception.

1. Barker J., Cooke M. 2007, Modelling speaker intelli-gibility in noise, Speech Communication, 49, 402-417.

2. Bregman A.S. (1990), Auditory Scene Analysis, MIT Press, Cambridge.

3. Brungart D.S., Chang P.S., Simpson B.D., Wang D.L. (2009), Multitalker speech perception with ideal time-frequency segregation: Effects of voice characteristicsand number of talkers, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 125, 4006-4022.

4. Cooke M.P. (2006), A glimpsing model of speech per-ception in noise, J.Acoust. Soc. Am., 119, 1562-1573.

5. Fastl H., Zwicker E. (2007), Psychoacoustics - factsand models, Springer - Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg.

6. Gescheider G.A. (1997), Psychophysics: The Funda-mentals, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

7. Howard-Jones P.A., Rosen S. (1993a), The percep-tion of speech in fluctuating noise, Acustica, 78, 258-272.

8. Howard-Jones, P.A., Rosen S. (1993b), Uncomodu-lated glimpsing in ‘checkerboard’ noise, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 93, 2915-2922.

9. ITU (International Telecommunication Union) (1997), Methods for the subjective assessment of small impair-ments in audio systems including multichannel soundsystems, Recommendation BS.1116-1.

10. Kelly M.C., Tew A.I. (2002), The continuity illu-sion in virtual auditory space, Proc. 112th AES Conv. Preprint 5548.

11. Kelly M.C., Tew A.I. (2003), The significance ofspectral overlap in multiple-source localization, Proc. 114th AES Conv. Preprint 5725.

12. Kingdom F.A.A., Prins N. (2010), Psychophysics:A Practical Introduction, Academic Press, London.

13. Kleczkowski P. (2002), Acoustic Signal Expansionin Multiple Trigonometric Bases, Acta Acustica united with Acustica, 88, 526-535.

14. Kleczkowski P. (2005), Selective Mixing of Sounds, 119th AES Conv., New York, Preprint 6552, October 2005.

15. Kleczkowski P. (2008), Selective mixing of a sym-phony orchestra recording, Archives of Acoustics, 31, 4 (Supplement), 91-99.

16. Kleczkowski P., Plewa M., Pluta M. (2010), Masking a frequency band in a musical fragment playedby a single instrument, Acta Physica Polonica A, 119, 991-995.

17. Kleczkowski P., Pluta M. (2012), Understandingconcurrent speech is not impaired by removal of spectro-temporal overlap, Acoustics 2012 Conference, Hong Kong.

18. Lu Y., Cooke M. (2008), Speech production modifi-cations produced by competing talkers, babble, and sta-tionary noise, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 124, 3261-3275.

19. Malvar H.S. (1992), Signal Processing with LappedTransforms, Artech House, London.

20. Moore B.C.J. (2003), An Introduction to the Psychol-ogy of Hearing, Academic Press, London.

21. Moore B.C.J., Glasberg B.R., Plack C.J., Bis- was A.K. (1988), The shape of the ear’s temporal win-dow, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 83, 1102-1117.

22. Viemeister N.F., Wakefield G.H. (1991), Temporalintegration and multiple looks, J. Acoust. Soc., 90, 858-865.

23. Wang D.L., Brown G.J. (2006), Fundamen-tals of computational auditory scene analysis [in:] Wang D.L., Brown G.J. [Eds.], Computational audi-tory scene analysis: Principles, Algorithms, and Appli-cations, IEEE Press/Wiley-Interscience., Hoboken NJ, pp. 1-44.

Archives of Acoustics

The Journal of Institute of Fundamental Technological of Polish Academy of Sciences

Journal Information


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.816
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.835

CiteScore 2016: 1.15

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.432
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.948

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 122 95 7
PDF Downloads 66 59 6