Is digit ratio (2D:4D) associated with the choice for the uniformed versus a civil study course by the Polish youth?

Open access


The 2nd to 4th digit ratio (2D:4D) is a sexually dimorphic trait determined by the relative balance of prenatal testosterone (T) and oestrogen during the intrauterine development of foetus. Males on average have relatively lower 2D:4D than women in population. Lower 2D:4D is very often linked with greater physical ability, strength, superior sporting performance and many personality traits and behaviours which are seen more among the males. Recently, lower 2D:4D were associated with military and police services among the Polish women. The objectives of this study were to examine whether 2D:4D differed between the students of a study course for future military service and a civil study course and whether sex difference in this ratio is present in both these groups. The cross sectional study included 50 boys and 42 girls enrolled in the uniformed course and other 56 boys and 50 girls of a general course in an upper-secondary School. The lengths of the second (2D) and fourth fingers (4D) of each hand were measured to have the 2D:4D ratio. Height and weight were also recorded. Overall, as well as among the civil course students, males showed significantly lower mean 2D:4D compared to the females. But there was no significant sex difference in digit ratio among the uniformed course students. Besides, the females under uniformed course showed lower 2D:4D than the females in civil course, whereas, the male uniformed students had similar or almost same 2D:4D values with the male civil course students. Increased prenatal testosterone exposure might have a role in determining the choice towards a challenging future occupation and such effect is perhaps more pronounced in women than in males.

Apicella CL, Dreber A, Campbell B, Gray PB, Hoffman M, Little AC. 2008.Testosterone and financial risk preferences. Evol Hum Behav 29 (6):384–90.

Apicella CL, Dreber A, Gray PB, Hoffman M, Little AC, Benjamin BC. 2011. Androgens and competitiveness in men. J Neurosci Psychol Econ 4(1):54–62.

Auger J, Le Denmat D, Berges R, Doridot L, Salmon B, Canivenc-Lavier MC, Eustache F. 2013. Environmental levels of ooestrogenic and antiandrogenic compounds feminize digit ratios in male rats and their unexposed male progeny. Proc R Soc Biol Sci 280(1768):20131532.

Austin EJ, Manning JT, McInroy K, Mathews E. 2012. A preliminary investigation of the association between personality, cognitive ability and digit ratio. Pers Indiv Differ 33(7):1115–24.

Auyeung B, Baron-Cohen S, Ashwin E, Knickmeyer R, Taylor K, Hackett G, Hines M. 2009. Fetal testosterone predicts sexually differentiated childhood behaviour in girls and in boys. Psychol Sci 20(2):144–8.

Auyeung B, Lombardo MV, Baron-Cohen S. 2013.Prenatal and postnatal hormone effects on the human brain and cognition. Pflügers Archiv Eur J Physiol 465(5):557–71.

Ball S, Eckel C, Heracleous M. 2010. Risk Aversion and Physical Prowess: Prediction, Choice and Bias. J Risk Uncertainty 41(3):167–93.

Bönte W, Procher VD, Urbig D and Voracek M. 2017. Digit ratio (2D:4D) predicts self-reported measures of general competitiveness, but not behavior in economic experiments. Front Behav Neurosci 11:238.

Branas-Garza P, Rustichini A. 2011. Organising effects of testosterone and economic behaviour: Not just risk taking. PLoS One 6(12):e29842.

Breedlove SM. 2010. Organizational hypothesis: Instances of the fingerpost. Endocrinol 151(9): 4116–22.

Brosnan MJ. 2006. Digit ratio and faculty membership: Implications for the relationship between prenatal testosterone and academia. Br J Psychol 97(4):455–66.

Brown WM, Finn CJ, Bradley MC, Breedlove SM. 2002 Differences in finger length ratios between self identifies “butch” and “femme” lesbians. Arch Sex Behav 31(1):123–7.

Cohen-Bendahan CC, van de Beek C Berenbaum SA. 2005. Prenatal sex hormone effects on child and adult sex-typed behaviour: methods and findings. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 29(2):353–384. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.11.004

Csatho A, Osvath A, Bicsak E, Karadi K, Manning J, Kallai J. 2003. Sex role identity related to the ratio of second to fourth digit length in women. Biol Psychol 62(2):147–56.

Csatho A, Osvath A, Karadi K, Bicsak E, Manning J, Kallai J. 2003. Spatial navigation related to the ratio of second to fourth digit length in women. Learn Indiv Differences 13(3):239–49.

Daruvala D. 2007.Gender, Risk and Stereotypes.J Risk Uncertainty 35(3):265–83.

Dell Inc. (2016). Dell Statistica (data analysis software system), version 13.

Dworkin SL. 2001. “Holding back”: Negotiating a glass ceiling on women’s muscular strength. Sociol Perspective 44(3):333–50.

Fink B, Neave N, Laughton K, Manning JT. 2006. Second to fourth digit ratio and sensation seeking. Pers Indiv Differ 41(7):1253–62.

Galis F, Ten Broek CM, Van Dongen S, Wijnaendts LC. 2010. Sexual dimorphism in the prenatal digit ratio. Arch Sex Behav 39(1):57–62.

Garbarino E, Slonim R, Sydnor J. 2011. Digit ratios (2D:4D) as predictors of risky decision making for both sexes. J Risk Uncertainty 42(1):1–26.

Goodyear MDE, Krleza-Jeric K, Lemmens, T. 2007. The Declaration of Helsinki. Br Med J 335:624–5.

Govier E. 2003. Brainsex and occupation: the role of serendipity in the genesis of an idea. J Managerial Psychol 18(5):440–52.

Gwunireama IU, Didia BC, Dapper DV. 2013. Hardcore Sciences and Biological Sciences: Digit ratio as an anthropometric differentiator. J Anat Sci 4(2):42–7.

Hines M. 2000. Gonadal hormones and sexual differentiation of human behaviour: effects on psychosexual and cognitive development. In: A Matsumoto (Ed), Sexual Differentiation of the Brain (pp 257–278) CRC Press, Florida.

Hines M. 2010. Sex-related variation in human behavior and the brain. Trends Cogn Sci 14(10):448–56.

Hines M, Constantinescu M, Spencer D. 2015. Early androgen exposure and human gender development. Biol Sex Differ 6:3.

Hönekopp J. 2011. Relationships between digit ratio 2D:4D and self-reported aggression and risk taking in an online study. Pers Indiv Differ 51(1):77–80.

Hönekopp J, Schuster M. (2010). A meta-analysis on 2D:4D and athletic prowess: substantial relationships but neither hand out-predicts the other, Pers Indiv Differ 48:4–10.

Huh HR. 2012. Born to be a marine: digit ratio and military service. Pers Indiv Differ 53(3):166–8.

Kociuba M, Chakraborty R, Ignasiak Z, Kozieł S. 2019. Digit ratio (2D:4D) moderates the changes in handgrip strength on an aggressive stimulus: A study among Polish young adults. Early Hum Dev 128:62–8.

Kociuba M, Koziel S, Chakraborty R. 2016. Sex differences in digit ratio (2D:4D) among the students of military and civil courses at military academy in Wroclaw, Poland. J Biosoc Sci 48(5):658–71.

Kociuba M, Koziel S, Chakraborty R, Ignasiak Z. 2017. Sport preference and digit ratio (2D:4D) among female students in Wroclaw, Poland. J Biosoc Sci 49(5):623–33.

Kozieł S, Chakraborty R, Sitek A. 2013. Second to fourth digits ratio (2D:4D) and subjective pain experience in tattooing. Anthropol Rev 76(1):117–24.

Kozieł S, Chakraborty R, Sitek A, Ignasiak Z. 2018. Further evidence of association of low second-to-fourth digit ratio (2D:4D) with selection in uniformed services – a study among police personnel from Wroclaw, Poland. J Biosoc Sci 50(4):527–39.

Kozieł S, Kociuba M, Chakraborty R, Ignasiak Z. 2017. Physical fitness and digit ratio (2D:4D) in male student from Wroclaw, Poland. Coll Antropol 41(1):31–8.

Kozieł S, Kociuba M, Ignasiak Z, Chakraborty R. 2016. Is sport choice and participation related to 2D:4D? A study among adult male student in Wroclaw, Poland. Coll Antropol 40(2):105–10.

Krane V, Waldron J, Michalenok J, Stiles-Shipley J. 2001. Body image, and eating and exercise behaviours: A feminist cultural studies perspective. Women. Sport Phys Activity J 10(1):17–54.

Lombardo MV, Ashwin E, Auyeung B, Chakrabarti B, Taylor K, Hackett G, Bullmore ET, Baron-Cohen S. 2012. Fetal testosterone influences sexually dimorphic gray matter in the human brain. J Neurosci 32(2):674–80.

Lutchmaya S, Baron-Cohen S, Raggatt P, Knickmeyer R, Manning JT. 2004. 2nd to 4th digit ratios, fetal testosterone and estradiol. Early Hum Dev 77:23–8.

Malas MA, Dogan S, Evcil EH, Desdicioglu K. 2006.Fetal development of the hand, digits and digit ratio (2D:4D). Early Hum Dev 82(1–2):469–75.

Manning JT. 2002. Digit Ratio: A Pointer to Fertility, Behaviour and Health. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

Manning JT. 2011. Resolving the role of prenatal sex steroids in the development of digit ratio. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 108(39):16143–4.

Manning J, Kilduff L, Cook C, Crewther B, Fink B. 2014. Digit ratio (2D:4D): a biomarker for prenatal sex steroids and adult sex steroids in challenge situations. Front Endocrinol 5:9.

Manning JT, Reimers S, Baron-Cohen S, Wheelwright S, Fink B. 2010. Sexually dimorphic traits (digit ratio, height, systemizing-empathizing scores) and gender segregation between occupations. Evidence from the BBC internet study. PersIndiv Differ 49(5):511–5.

Manning JT, Taylor RP. 2001. 2nd to 4th digit ratio and male ability in sport: implications for sexual selection in humans. Evol Hum Behav 22(1):61–9.

Manning JT, Trivers R, Fink B. 2017. Is digit ratio (2D: 4D) related to masculinity and femininity? Evidence from the BBC internet study. Evol Psychol Sci 3(4):316–24.

McFadden D, Bracht MS. 2003. The relative lengths and weights of metacarpals and metatarsals in baboons (papio hamadryas). Horm Behav 43(2):347–55.

McIntyre MH, Cohn BA, Ellison PT. 2006. Sex dimorphism in the digital formulae of children. Am J Phys Anthropol 129(1):143–50.

McIntyre MH, Ellison PT, Lieberman DE, Demerath E, Towne B. 2005. The development of sex differences in digital formula from infancy in the Fels Longitudinal Study. Proc R Soc Biol Sci 272:1473–9.

Nye JVC, Orel E. 2015. The influence of prenatal hormones on occupational choice: 2D:4D evidence from Moscow. Pers Indiv Differ 78:39–42.

Sapienza P, Zingales L, Maestripieri D. 2009. Gender differences in financial risk aversion and career choices are affected by testosterone. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:15268–73.

Stenstrom E, Saad G, Nepomuceno MV, Mendenhall Z. 2011. Testosterone and domain-specific risk: Digit ratios (2D:4D and rel2) as predictors of recreational, financial, and social risk-taking behaviours. Pers Indiv Differ 51(4): 412–6.

Sudhakar HH, Veena UB, Nadig TR. 2013. Digit ratio (2D:4D) and performance in Indian Swimmers. Ind J Physiol Pharmacol 57(1):72–6.

Swed A, Kosinska M, Manning J. 2017. Digit ratio (2D:4D) and month of birth: A link to the solstitial-melatonin-testosterone effect. Early Hum Dev 104:23–6.

Trivers R, Manning J, Jacobson A. 2006. A longitudinal study of digit ratio (2D:4D) and other finger ratios in Jamaican children. Horm Behav 49(2):150–6.

van Honk EJ, Schutter DJLG, Hermans EJ, Putman PLJ, Tuiten A, Koppeschaar HPF. 2004. Testosterone shifts the balance between sensitivity for punishment and reward in healthy young women. Psychoneuroendocrinol 29(7):937–43.

Voracek M, Pum U, Dressler SG. 2010. Investigating digit ratio (2D:4D) in a highly male-oriented occupation: The case of firefighters. Scand J Psychol 51(2):146–56.

Wang XT, Kruger DJ, Wilke A. 2009. Life history variables and risk-taking propensity. Evol Hum Behav 30:77–84.

Weis SE, Firker, A, Hennig J. 2007.Associations between the second to fourth digit ratio and career interests. Pers Indiv Differ 43(3):485–93.

Williams TJ, Pepitone ME, Christensen SE, Cooke BM, Huberman AD, Breedlove NJ, Breedlove TJ, Jordan C, Breedlove SM. 2000. Finger length ratios and sexual orientation. Nature 404(6777):455–6.

Zhao D, Yu K, Zhang X, Zheng L. 2013. Digit Ratio (2D:4D) and Handgrip Strength in Hani Ethnicity. PLoS One, 8(10), e77958.

Zheng Z, Cohn MJ. 2011. Developmental Basis of Sexually Dimorphic digit ratios. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(39):16289–94.

Anthropological Review

The Journal of Polish Anthropological Society

Journal Information

CiteScore 2018: 0.55

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.22
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.472


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 55 55 55
PDF Downloads 36 36 36