Footprint analysis and prevalence of flatfoot: a study among the children of South 24 Parganas, West Bengal, India

Open access


The present study envisages the morphological differences in anthropometric measurements on footprints among the preschool children and analyzes its manifestation in the different weight category. This study also focuses on the diagnosis of flatfoot among the studied population. Data has been collected from 160 participants (80 boys and 80 girls) from Bengali Hindu caste population aged 3 to 6 years. Anthropometric measurements included height, weight and body mass index. Other measurements on foot morphology included foot length, foot breadth diagonal, foot breadth horizontal, ball of the foot length, outside ball of the boot length, heel breadth, and toe lengths T1, T2, T3.T4, T5. Staheli’s Plantar Arch Index, Chippaux-Smirak Index and foot angle were calculated. Various statistical tests like t-test, Pearson’s correlation and ANOVA were performed. Among all the variables, foot breadth horizontal showed statistically significant difference between boys and girls (p<0.05). All the footprint dimensions showed a significant (p<0.05) positive correlation with height and weight in both the boys and the girls. However, the Staheli’s Plantar Arch Index showed a significant (p<0.05) negative correlation with height and weight and Chippaux-Smirak Index showed a significant (p<0.05) negative correlation with height only among both the boys and the girls. Significant differences (ANOVA) were found between the foot morphology of children in three different weight categories (underweight, healthy and overweight) except the foot angle, and both indices. The present study evinces that weight affects the foot structure of the children. The prevalence of flatfoot was found to be 57.5% among the children with no significant difference (p<0.05) between the boys and the girls. The results thus provide a podium for intricate studies in the future. Timely prognosis of flatfoot in children can instigate early rectification of flat-footedness.

Abledu Jubilant Kwame, AbleduGodfred Kwame, Offei EricBekoe, Antwi Emmanuel Mensah. 2015. Determination of Sex from Footprint Dimensions in a Ghanaian Population. PLOS ONE 10(10):e0139891.

Agnihotri AK, Purwar B, Googoolybe K, Agnihotri S, Jeebun N. 2007a. Estimation of stature by foot length. J Forensic Leg Med 14:279-83.

Agnihotri AK, Shukla S, Purwar B. 2007b. Determination of sex from the foot measurements. Internet Journal of Forensic Science 2(1):18.

Bari Siti Balkis, Othman Mumtazah and Salleh Naimah Mohd. 2010. Foot Anthropometry for Shoe Design among Pre school Children in Malaysia. Pertanika J Soc Sci and Hum18(1):69-79.

Center for Disease Control and Prevention: About Child and Teen BMI. Availabble at:

Chang CH, Chen YC, Yang WT, Ho PC, Hwang AW, Chen CH, Chang JH, Chang LW. 2014. Flatfoot diagnosis by a unique bimodal distribution of footprint index in children. PLOS ONE 9(12):e115808.

Chang HW, Lin CJ, Kuo LC, Tsai MJ, Chieh HF, Su FC. 2012. Three dimensional measurement of foot arch in preschool children. Biomed central 10(2):141-6.

Chang JH, Wang SH, Kuo CL, Shen HC, Hong YW, Lin LC. 2010. Prevalence of flexible flatfoot in Taiwanese school-aged children in relation to obesity, gender and age. Eur J Ped 169:447-52.

Cheng JC, Leung SS, Leung AK, Guo X, Sher a, Mak AF. 1997. Change of foot size with weight bearing - A study of 2829 children 3 to 18 years of age. Clin Orthop Realte Res 342:123-131

Chen JP, Chung MJ, Wang MJ. 2009. Flatfoot prevalence and foot dimensions of 5 to 13 year-old children in Taiwan. Foot Ankle Int 30(4):326-332.

Deepashini H, Omar B, Paungmali A, Amaramalar N, Ohnmar H, Leonard J. 2014. An insight into the plantar pressure distribution of the foot in clinical practice: Narrative review. Polish Ann Med. Polish Paediatric Society 21:51-56

Delgado-Abellán L, Aguado X, Jiménez- Ormeño E, Mecerreyes L, Alegre LM. 2014. Foot morphology in Spanish school children according to sex and age. Ergonomics 57(5):787-972.

Echarri J J, Forriol F. 2003.The development of foot morphology1851 Congolese children from urban and rural areas and relationship between the wearing shoes. J Pediatr Orthop 12(2):141-6

El O, Akeali O, Kosay C, Kaner B, Arslan Y, Sagol E, Soylev S, Iyidogan D, Cinar N, Peker O. 2006. Flexible flatfoot and related factors in primary school children: a report of a screening study. Rheumatol Int 26(11):1050-53.

Fessler DM, Haley KJ, Lal RD. 2005. Sexual dimorphism in foot length proportionate to stature. Ann Hum Biol 32:44-59.

Halabchi Farzin, Mazaheri Reza, Mirshahi Maryam, Abbasian Ladan. 2013. Pediatric flexible flatfoot: clinical aspects and algorithmic approach. Iran J Pediatr 23(3):247-260

Hazzaa Heba H, El-Meniawy Gehan H, Ahmed Safaa E and Bedie Mohamed B. 2015. Correlation between gender and age and flat foot in obese children. Trends Applied Sci Res10(4):207-15.

Hemy N, Flavel A, Ishak N, Franklin D. 2013. Sex estimation using anthropometry of feet and footprints in a Western Australian Population. Forensic Sci Int 231:402e1-402e6.

Hernandez Arnold Jose, Kimura Luiz Koichi, Laraya Marcos Henrique Ferreira and Favaro Edimar. 2007. Calculation of Staheli’s Plantar Arch Index and prevalence flatfeet: A study with 100 children aged 5-9 years. Acta Ortopedica Brasileira 15:68-71.

Hillstrom JH, Song J, Kraszewski PA, Hafer FJ, Mootanah R, Dufour BA. 2013. Foot type biomechanics part 1: Structure and function of the asymptomatic foot. Gait Posture 37:445-58.

Jiménez-Ormeño Ester, Aguado Xavier and Delgado-Abellán Laura andMecerreyes Laura and Alegre Luis M.2013.Foot morphology in normal-weight, overweight, and obese schoolchildren. Eur J Pediatr DOI 10.1007

Kanchan T, Menezes RG, Moudgil R, Kaur R, Garg RK. 2008. Stature estimation from foot dimensions. Forensic Sci Int 179:241. el-5

Krauss I, Grau S, Mauch M, Maiwald C, Horstmann T.2008. Sex-related differences in foot shape. Ergonomics 51:1693-709.

Krishan K. 2008. Estimation of stature from footprint and foot outline dimension in Gujjars of North India. Forensic Sci Int 175:93-101.

Krishan K, Sharma A. 2007. Estimation of stature from dimensions of hands and feet in North Indian population. J Forensic Leg Med 14:327-32.

Krishan K, Kanchan T, Passi N, DiMaggio J A. 2012. Heel-ball (HB) index: sexual dimorphism of a new index from foot dimensions. J Forensic Sci 57:172-75.

Mauch M, Mickle KJ, Munro BJ, Dowling AM, Grau S, Steele JR. 2008. Do the feet of German and Australian children differ in structure? Implications for children’s shoe design, Ergonomics 51(4):527-39.

Mauch M, Grau S, Krauss I, Maiwald C, Horstmann T .2008. Foot morphology of normal, underweight and overweight children. Int J Obes (Lond) 32(7):1068-75.

Moorthy NT, Ling AY, Sarippudin SA, Nik Hassan NF. 2014. Estimation of stature from footprint and foot outline measurements in Malaysian Chinese. Aust J Forensic Sci 46:136-59.

Mukherji Dipak, Mukherjee Debaprasad, Bharati Premananda. 2007. Laboratory manual for Biological Anthopology, New Delhi: Asian Books Private Limited.

Mickle KJ, Steele JR, Munro BJ. 2006. The feet of overweight and obese young children: are they flat or fat? Obesity (Silver Spring) 14(11):1949-53.

Morrison SC, Durward BR, Watt GF, Donaldson MD. 2007. Anthropometric foot structure of peri-pubescent children with excessive versus normal body mass: a cross-sectional study. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 97(5):366-70.

Nemeth B. 2011.The diagnosis and management if common childhood orthopaedic disorders. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care 41(1):2-28.

Nikolaidu ME, Boudolos KD. 2006. A footprint- based approach for the rational classification of foot types in young school children. The Foot 1682-90.

Ozdinc AS, Turanz NF. 2016. Effects of ballet training of children in Turkey on foot anthropometric measurements and medial longitudinal arc development. J Pak Med Assoc 66(7):869-74.

Riddiford-Harland DL, Steele JR, Baur LA. 2011. Are the feet of obese children fat or flat? Revisiting the debate. Int J Obes (Lond) 35(1):115-20.

Riddiford-Harland DL, Steele JR, Storlien LH. 2000. Does obesity influence foot structure in prepubescent children? Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 24(5):541-44.

Sacco C N Isabel, Onodera N Andrea, Bosch Kestin and Rosenbaum Dietar. 2015. Comparisons of foot anthropometry and plantar arch indices between German and Brazilian children. BMC Paediatrics 15:4.

Staheli LH. 1999. Planovalgus foot deformity. Current status. Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 89 (2) 94-99.

Tsung BYS, Zhang M, Fan YB, Boone DA. 2003. Quantitative comparison of plantar foot shapes under different weight-bearing conditions. J Rehabil Res Dev 40:517.

Ukoha UU, Egwu OA, Ezeani MC, Anyabolu AE, Ejimofor OC, Nzeako HC, et al. 2013. Estimation of stature using footprints in an adult student population in Nigeria. IJBAR 4: 827-33.

Villarroya MA, Esquivel JM, Tomas C, Moreno LA, Buenafe A, Bueno G. 2009. Assessment of the medical longitudinal arch in children and adolescents with obesity: Foot prints and Radiographic study. Eur J Pediatr 168(5):559-67.

Wearing SC, Hennig EM, Byrne NM, Steele JR, Hills AP. 2006.The impact of childhood obesity on musculoskeletal form. Obe Rev 7(2):209-18.

Witana CP, Feng J, Goonetilleke RS. 2004. Dimensional differences for evaluating the quality of footwear fit. Ergonomics 47(12):1301-17.

Wunderlich RE, Cavanagh PR. 2001. Gender differences in adult foot shape: Implications for shoe design. Med Sci Sports Exer 33:605-11.

Anthropological Review

The Journal of Polish Anthropological Society

Journal Information

CiteScore 2017: 0.70

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.282
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.439


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 489 489 29
PDF Downloads 178 178 11