Fractional calculus provides an important characteristic to describe the complicated physical phenomena with memory effects. For this reason, the fractional calculus is becoming increasingly used as a modeling tool in physics, engineering and control processing in various fields of sciences such as fluid dynamics, plasma physics, mathematical biology and chemical kinetics, diffusion, etc [1, 2, 3, 4]. Due to their properties, fractional derivatives and integrals make this kind of calculus a good candidate to describe such phenomena. Some fundamental definitions of fractional derivatives were given by Riemann-Liouville and Liouville-Caputo [5, 6, 7, 8, 9]. Recently, Caputo and Fabrizio defined a new fractional derivative without singular kernel  named Caputo-Fabrizio derivative with specific properties, the derivative of a constant is zero and the initial conditions used in the fractional differential equations having a physical interpretation. Later, Atangana and Baleanu proposed another fractional derivative with non-local and non-singular kernel named Atangana-Baleanu derivative . Besides, seeking exact solutions of fractional partial differential equations is not an easy task, and it's remain a relevant problem. Therefore, many powerful methods have been proposed for solving analytically the fractional partial differential equations. Such methods include; Homotopy Perturbation Method , Homotopy Perturbation coupled with Sumudu Transform , Adomian Mecomposition Method , Variational Iteration Method , Fractional Iteration Method , etc.
On the author hand, recent investigations show that the invariant subspace method, developed by V.A. Galaktionov and S.R. Svirshchevski , is an effective tool to construct exact solutions of some fractional partial differential equations with Caputo fractional derivative. R.Sahadevan and P.Prakash  used invariant subspace method to derive exact solutions of certain time fractional nonlinear partial differential equations, Hashemi  also adopted the same method to solve partial differential equations with conformable derivatives, Choudhary et al.  used this technique to explore solutions of some fractional differential equations, etc.
In the present paper, we present a modified version of the invariant subspace method which does not require any use of the Laplace transformation. We then make use of this novel technique to solve some fractional partial differential equations using fractional operators of Caputo-Fabrizio and also Atangana-Baleanu type. The exact solutions of these equations are obtained by solving the reduced systems constructed from the studied equations.
The laout of the paper is organized as follows: In section 2, we present some basic definitions of fractional derivatives and integrals. Section 3 describes the modified invariant subspace method. Construction of exact solutions to some partial differential equations with Caputo-Fabrizio and Atangan-Baleanu derivatives is presented in section 4. Finally, concluding remarks are given in section 5.
2 Fractional Calculus tools
In this section, we present some important defnitions and mathematical concepts on fractional derivatives with nonsingular kernels and related tools.
This function arises naturally in the solution of fractional order integral equations or fractional order differential equations. It interpolate between a purely exponential law and power-law like behavior of phenomena governed by ordinary kinetic equations and their fractional counterparts.
On the other hand, Caputo and Fabrizio  developed a new fractional derivative as follows
It's clear that the Caputo-Fabrizio derivative has no singular kernel, since the kernel is based on exponential function.
Recently, Atangana and Baleanu proposed a new fractional derivative which has non-local and non-singular kernel based on the generalized Mittag-Leffler function. More recently, they claimed that there is two general definitions of their derivative in the Riemann-Liouville and Caputo sense. Moreover, this fractional derivative has a fractional integral as an anti-derivative of their operators.
The Atangana-Baleanu fractional derivative in Caputo sense (ABC) is given by
The AB fractional integral operator of order α is given by 
3 Description of the Modified Method
Recently, Gazizov and Kasatkin  showed that the invariant subspace method can be applied also to equations with time fractional derivative.
The modified invariant subspace method is based on the following basic definitions and results .
Let f1(x),..., fn(x) be an n linearly independent functions and Wn is the n-dimensional linear space namely Wn = 〈f1(x),..., fn(x)〉. Wn is said to be invariant under the given operator F if F[u] ∈ Wn whenever u ∈ Wn.
The important question concerning the modified invariant subspace method was how to obtain the corresponding invariant subspace of a given differential operator. The answer of this question is given by the following proposition, for more details we refer the reader to .
4.1 Fractional partial differential equations with Caputo-Fabrizio derivative
In this section, we apply the modified invariant subspace method to construct exact solutions of some partial differential equations with Caputo-Fabrizio derivative in time.
• Example 1:
• Example 2:
• Example 3:
• Example 4:
Similarly, we find that the function c2(t) is a constant and then we assume that c2(t) = 1.
4.2 Fractional partial differential equations with Atangana-Baleanu derivative
In what follows, we discuss four examples of getting exact solutions to some partial differential equations with Atangana-Baleanu fractional derivative.
• Example 1:
• Example 2:
From second equation of (50) it comes c2(t) is a constant then we assume that
• Example 3:
• Example 4:
From (64), it can be infered that c2(t) is a constant, let us assume that c2(t) = 1.
The modifed invariant subspace method was used to seek exact solutions to a class of nonlinear equations with fractional derivatives having nonsingular kernels. Several examples illustrated the effectiveness of the invariant subspace theory for exploring solution of various structures. It is also worth mentionning that the present method does not need any use of laplace transform. Furthermore, some graphical reprensentations are given to show the profiles of the obtained solutions. We stress here that those solutions are very useful to test the efficiency of newly suggested numerical methods for solving partial differential equations with Caputo-Fabrizio or Atangana-Baleanu fractional derivatives.
J. Singh, D. Kumar, Z. Hammouch, A. Atangana: A fractional epidemiological model for computer viruses pertaining to a new fractional derivative. Applied Mathematics and Computation. 504–515, (2018).
J. Singh. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science. 013137, (2019).
J. Singh, and D. Kumar, and D. Baleanu. An efficient numerical algorithm for the fractional Drinfeld–Sokolov–Wilson equation. Applied Mathematics and Computation. 12–24, (2018).
J. Singh, and D. Kumar, and D. Baleanu. On the analysis of fractional diabetes model with exponential law. Advances in Difference Equations. 231, (2018).
I. Podlubny: Fractional Differential Equations. Academic Press, San Diego, CA (1999).
G. Samko, A.A. Kilbas and S. Marichev: Fractional Integrals and Derivatives: Theory and Applications. Gordon and Breach, Yverdon (1993).
A.A Kilbas, M.H. Srivastava and J.J. Trujillo: Theory and Application of Fractional Differential Equations. North Holland Mathematics Studies, vol. 204 (2006).
K. Miller and B. Ross: An introduction to the fractional calculus and fractional differential Equations, John Wiley, Sons Inc., New York, 1993.
D. Baleanu, K. Diethelm, E. Scalas and J.J. Trujillo: Fractional Calculus Models and Numerical Methods. Series on Complexity, Nonlinearity and Chaos. World Scientific, Singapore (2012).
M. Caputo and M. Fabrizio: A new definition of fractional derivative without singular kernel. Prog. Fract. Differ. Appl. 1(2), 73–85 (2015).
J.D. Djida, A. Atangana and I. Area: Numerical computation of a fractional derivative with non-local and non-singular kernel. MMNP. Vol. 7, pp. 32–41 (2012).
H. Jafari, A. Golbabai, S. Seifi and K. Sayvand: Homotopy analysis method for solving multi-term linear and nonlinear diffusion-wave equations of fractional order, Comput. Math. Appl. 59, pp. 1337–1344 (2010).
K. Ait Touchent et al: Implementation and convergence analysis of homotopy perturbation coupled with sumudu transform to construct solutions of local-fractional pdes. Fractal and Fractional. 2.3, pp.22 (2018).
Z. Hammouch, T. Mekkaoui: Approximate analytical and numerical solutions to fractional KPP-like equations. Gen. maths Notes. N.2, Vol.14, pp.1–9 (2013).
Z. Hammouch, T. Mekkaoui: A Laplace-Variational Iteration Method for Solving the Homogeneous Smoluchowski Coagulation Equation. Applied Mathematical Sciences; 6.18, pp.879–886 (2012).
T. Mekkaoui, Z. Hammouch: Approximate analytical solutions to the Bagley-Torvik equation by the fractional iteration method. Annals of the University of Craiova-Mathematics and Computer Science Series. 39.2, pp.251–256 (2012).
V. Galaktionov, S. Svirshchevskii: Exact solutions and invariant subspaces of nonlinear partial differential equations in mechanics and physics. Chapman and Hall/CRC applied mathematics and nonlinear science series, 2007.
R. Sahadevan Ramajayam, B. Thangarasu Bakkyaraj: Invariant subspace method and exact solutions of certain nonlinear time fractional partial differential equations. Fractional Calculus and Applied Analysis. 18.1, 146–162 (2015).
M.S. Hashemi: Invariant subspaces admitted by fractional differential equations with conformable derivatives. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals. 107, 161–169 (2018).
S. Choudhary, V. Daftardar-Gejji: Invariant subspace method: a tool for solving fractional partial differential equations. Fractional Calculus and Applied Analysis. 20.2, 477–493 (2017).
] G.M. Mittag-Leffler: Sopra la funzione Eα(x), Rendiconti della Reale Accademia dei Lincei (Ser. v). 3–5 13(1904).
R. Gazizov and A. Kasatkin: Construction of exact solutions for fractional order differential equations by the invariant subspace method, Computers and Mathematics with Applications, vol. 66, no. 5, 576–584, 2013.