Introduction. Although in recent years there have been various versions of pancreatic - digestive reconstruction after cephalic duodenopancreatectomy, this issue is still highly debated.
Purpose. This paper aims at comparing postoperative outcomes after gastric pancreatic anastomosis using transfixing threads as opposed to the purse-string suture method.
Material and methods. Our study consisted of a lot of 15 patients that underwent cephalic duodenopancreatectomy from the 1th of May 2014 to the 30th of April 2015. The pancreatico - digestive reconstruction was done by pancreatico-gastric anastomosis using three different techniques: double purse-string suture used for the patients in the first group (group 1, n = 5 patients); one purse-string suture and 2 transfixing “U-sutures” passed through the stomach and the pancreas for the patients in the second group (group 2, n = 5 patients) and ductomucosa anastomosis with pancreatico-gastric transfixing threads in the third group (group 3, n = 5 patients).
Results. Morbidity was 40% for the entire lot. Pancreatic fistula, occurred in two patients, one type A fistula in a patient in group 2 and one type B fistula in a patient in group 3. Biliary fistula occurred in one patient in group 2. Mortality was at 13.3%. The median time to carry out the anastomosis in group 1 was 14 minutes, for patients in group 2, 20 minutes, and for patients in group 3, 25 minutes.
Conclusions. Gastric pancreatic anastomosis using purse-string sutures is a feasible, safe and fast process which reduces complications due to transfixing pancreatic threads.
1. Shailesh V. Shrikhande, Jörg Kleeff, Markus W. Büchler, Helmut Friess. Pancreatic anastomosis after pancreaticoduodenectomy: how we do it. Indian J Surg. 2007 Dec;69:224–229.
2. Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Sohn TA, et al. Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: pathology, complications, and outcomes. Ann Surg. 1997;226:248–257; discussion pp 257–260.
3. Trede M, Schwall G, Saeger HD. Survival after pancreatoduodenectomy. 118 consecutive resections without an operative mortality. Ann Surg. 1990;211:447–558.
4. Reid-Lombardo KM1, Farnell MB, Crippa S, et al. Pancreatic anastomotic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy in 1,507 patients: a report from the Pancreatic Anastomotic Leak Study Group. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007;11:1451-1458.
5. Pratt WB, Maithel SK, Vanounou T, Huang ZS, Callery MP, Vollmer CM Jr. Clinical and economic validation of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) classification scheme. Ann Surg. 2007;245:443-451.
6. Stylianos Katsaragakis, Andreas Larentzakis, Sotirios-Georgios Panousopoulos, et al. A new pancreaticojejunostomy technique: A battle against postoperative pancreatic fistula. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:4351-4355.
7. Haddad LB, Scatton O, Randone B, et al. Pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: the conservative treatment of choice. HPB (Oxford). 2009;11:203-209.
8. Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery. 2005;138:8-13.
9. Butturini G, Daskalaki D, Molinari E, Scopelliti F, Casarotto A, Bassi C. Pancreatic fistula: definition and current problems. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2008;15:247-251.
10. C. Bassi, M. Falconi, E. Molinari, et al. Reconstruction by pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy following pancreatectomy: results of a comparative study. Annals of Surgery. 2005;242:767–773.
11. G. V. Aranha, P. Hodul, E. Golts, D. Oh, J. Pickleman, S. Creech. A comparison of pancreaticogastrostomy and pancreaticojejunostomy following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2003;7:672–682.
12. Kausch W. Das karzinom der papilla duodeni und seine radikale entfernung. Beitrage zur Klinischen Chirurgie. 1912;78:29-33.
13. Dixon E, Fingerhut A, Bassi C, Sutherland F, McKay A: Metaanalysis of pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy: authors’ comment (Br J Surg. 2006;93:929–936). Br J Surg. 2006;93:1435.
14. Zovak M, Mužina Mišić D, Glavčić G. Pancreatic surgery: evolution and current tailored approach. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2014;3(5):247-258. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2304-3881.2014.09.06.
15. Menahem B, Guittet L, Mulliri A, et al. Pancreaticogastrostomy is superior to pancreaticojejunostomy for prevention of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trails. Ann Surg. 2015;261:882–887.
16. Liu FB, Chen JM, Geng W, et al. Pancreaticogastrostomy is associated with significantly less pancreatic fistula than pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of seven randomized controlled trials. HPB (Oxford). 2015;17:123-130.
17. Schäfer M, Müllhaupt B, Clavien PA. Evidence-based pancreatic head resection for pancreatic cancer and chronic pancreatitis. Ann Surg. 2002;236:137-148.
18. Callery MP, Pratt WB, Vollmer CM Jr. Prevention and management of pancreatic fistula. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13:163-173.
19. Lin JW, Cameron JL, Yeo CJ, et al. Risk factors and outcomes in postpancreaticoduodenectomy pancreaticocutaneous fistula. J Gastrointest Surg. 2004;8:951-959.
20. Poon RT, Lo SH, Fong D, et al. Prevention of pancreatic anastomosis leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Am J Surg. 2002;183:42-52.
21. Ohigashi H, Ishikawa O, Eguchi H, et al. A simple and safe anastomosis in pancreaticogastrostomy using mattress sutures. American Journal of Surgery. 2008;196:130–134.
22. S. Y. Peng, D. F. Hong, Y. B. Liu, J. T. Li, F. Tao, and Z. J. Tan. A pancreas sutureless type II binding pancreaticogastrostomy. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2009;47(23):1764–1766.
23. Bartsch DK, Langer P, Kanngiesser V, Fendrich V, Dietzel K. A simple and safe anastomosis for pancreatogastrostomy using one binding purse-string and two transfixing mattress sutures. Int J Surg Oncol. 2012:718637.
24. Feng Zhu, Min Wang, Xin Wang, et al. Modified Technique of Pancreaticogastrostomy for Soft Pancreas with Two Continuous Hemstitch Sutures: A Single-Center Prospective Study. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;17:1306–1311.