Thermal Conductivity and Microstructure of Copper Coated Graphite Composite by Spark Plasma Sintering Process

Open access


This study focuses on the fabrication of thermal management material for power electronics applications using graphite flake reinforced copper composites. The manufacturing route involved electroless plating of copper in the graphite flake and sintering process are optimized. The microstructures, interface, thermal properties, and relative density of graphite/Cu composites are investigated. The relative density of the composites shows 99.5% after sintering. Thermal conductivities and coefficients of thermal expansion of this composites were 400-480 Wm−1K−1 and 8 to 5 ppm k−1, respectively. Obtained graphite nanoplatelets-reinforced composites exhibit excellent thermo-physical properties to meet the heat dispersion and matching requirements of power electronic devices to the packaging materials.

[1] S.D. Strand, “Future Technology in the Global Market,”Power Systems World, Oct. 23-27, 2005.

[2] J. Markoff, “Intel’s Big Shift After Hitting Technical Wall,” New York Times, May 17, 2004.

[3] S.B. Ren, X.Y. Shen, C.Y. Guo, N. Liu, J.B. Zang, X.B. He, X.H. Qu, Compos. Sci. Technol. 71, 1550-1555 (2011).

[4] C.-Y. Wen, G.-W. Huang, J. Power Sources 17, 8 132-140 (2008).

[5] R. Prieto, J.M. Molina, J. Narciso, E. Louis, Composites Part A 42, 1970-1977 (2011).

[6] J. Barcena, J. Maudes, J. Coleto, J.L. Baldonedo, J.M. Gomez de Salazar, Compos. Sci. Technol. 68, 1384-1391 (2008).

[6] H. Hiroshi, T. Minoru, Int. J. Eng. Sci. 24, 1159-1172 (1986).

[7] H. Kwon, J. Park, J. Korean Powder Metall. Inst. 23 3, 195-201 (2016).

[8] A.J. Schmidt, K.C. Collins, A.J. Minnich, G. Chen, J. Appl. Phys. 107, 104907 (2010).

[9] S. Stankovich, D.A. Dilin, R.D. Piner, Carbon 45, 1558-1565 (2007).

Archives of Metallurgy and Materials

The Journal of Institute of Metallurgy and Materials Science and Commitee on Metallurgy of Polish Academy of Sciences

Journal Information

IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.571
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.776

CiteScore 2016: 0.85

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.347
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.740

Cited By


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 238 238 26
PDF Downloads 126 126 12