Social Control Theory Variables in Conceptualizing Bonding Models of Attachment Theory and Adolescent Development

Open access


The developmental models on positive relations between youth and educational settings have increasingly been areas of interest for researchers, educators and developmental psychologists indicating that to have each and every individual ready to learn and instructors motivated to teach; academic achievement and psychological well-being of youth require an approach of bonding model in education for today’s diverse learner needs. In this regard, vigorous research together with a robust theoretical base provided by Attachment Theory was investigated as basis of the present study in obtaining an in depth analysis of healthy process of School Psychology for practitioners, psychologists and counselors through a focus on theoretical framework of Social Control Theory. Such an approach would not only help to develop a profound look into the betterment of educational and psychological services but also provide an essential insight into predictors for strong, healthy, academic development of adolescents. Present study, primarily aims at providing Theoretical Framework of Bonding Models through analysis of Social Control Theory as to conceptualize adolescents’ experiences and their attachment levels in order to prevent the risks of delinquent behavior with four major variables; attachment, commitment, involvement and belief. The study also focused on how these variables helped building bonding models of attachment in regard of its relation with fundamentals of attachment theory and its development into new directions.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Ainsworth M. D. (1964). Patterns of attachment behavior shown by the infant in interaction with his mother. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly of Behavior and Development 10(1) 51-58.

  • Ainsworth M. D. S. (1967). Infancy in Uganda: Infant care and the growth of love.

  • Ainsworth M. (1973). The Development of Infant-mother Attachment [w:] B. Caldwell HN Ricciuti (red.) Review of Child Development Research 1–94: Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Ainsworth M. D. S. Bowlby J. Fry M. & Organization W. H. (1965). Child care and the growth of love.

  • Arikan G. & Karanci N. (2012). Attachment and coping as facilitators of posttraumatic growth in Turkish university students experiencing traumatic events. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation 13(2) 209-225.

  • Battistich V. & Hom A. (1997). The relationship between students' sense of their school as a community and their involvement in problem behaviors. American journal of public health 87(12) 1997-2001.

  • Booth J. A. Farrell A. & Varano S. P. (2008). Social control serious delinquency and risky behavior: A gendered analysis. Crime & Delinquency.

  • Bowlby J. (1958). The nature of the child's tie to his mother. The international journal of psycho-analysis 39 350.

  • Bowlby J. (1969). Attachment and Loss: Attachment. V: Basic Books.

  • Bowlby J. (1960a). Grief and mourning in infancy and early childhood. Psychoanalytic study of the child 15(1) 9-52.

  • Bowlby J. (1960b). Separation anxiety. The international journal of psycho-analysis 41 89.

  • Brown R. & Evans W. P. (2002). Extracurricular activity and ethnicity creating greater school connection among diverse student populations. Urban Education 37(1) 41-58.

  • Bushway S. D. Piquero A. R. Broidy L. M. Cauffman E. & Mazerolle P. (2001). An empirical framework for studying desistance as a process. Criminology 39(2) 491-516.

  • Catalano R. F. & Hawkins J. D. (1996). A theory of antisocial behavior. Delinquency and crime: Current theories (1996) 149.

  • Cho H. Hallfors D. D. & Sánchez V. (2005). Evaluation of a high school peer group intervention for at-risk youth. Journal of abnormal child psychology 33(3) 363-374.

  • Dumais S. A. (2008). Cohort and gender differences in extracurricular participation: The relationship between activities math achievement and college expectations. Sociological Spectrum 29(1) 72-100.

  • Dumais S. A. (2009). The academic attitudes of American teenagers 1990–2002: Cohort and gender effects on math achievement. Social Science Research 38(4) 767-780.

  • Fredricks J. A. & Eccles J. S. (2008). Participation in extracurricular activities in the middle school years: Are there developmental benefits for African American and European American youth? Journal of Youth and Adolescence 37(9) 1029-1043.

  • Freud S. (1920). The psychogenesis of a case of female homosexuality. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis 1(2) 129-130.

  • Hawkins J. D. Guo J. Hill K. G. Battin-Pearson S. & Abbott R. D. (2001). Long-term effects of the Seattle Social Development Intervention on school bonding trajectories. Applied Developmental Science 5(4) 225-236.

  • Huebner A. J. & Betts S. C. (2002). Exploring the utility of social control theory for youth development issues of attachment involvement and gender. Youth & Society 34(2) 123-145.

  • Hirschi T. (1969). A control theory of delinquency. Criminology theory: Selected classic readings 289-305.

  • Hirschi T. (2002). Causes of delinquency: Transaction publishers.

  • Loukas A. Roalson L. A. & Herrera D. E. (2010). School connectedness buffers the effects of negative family relations and poor effortful control on early adolescent conduct problems. Journal of research on adolescence 20(1) 13-22.

  • Libbey H. P. (2004). Measuring student relationships to school: Attachment bonding connectedness and engagement. Journal of School Health 74(7) 274-283.

  • Maddox S. J. & Prinz R. J. (2003). School bonding in children and adolescents: Conceptualization assessment and associated variables. Clinical child and family psychology review 6(1) 31-49.

  • O’Farrell S. L. & Morrison G. M. (2003). A factor analysis exploring school bonding and related constructs among upper elementary students. The California School Psychologist 8(1) 53-72.

  • Resnick M. D. Bearman P. S. Blum R. W. Bauman K. E. Harris K. M. Jones J. . . . Shew M. (1997). Protecting adolescents from harm: findings from the National Longitudinal Study on Adolescent Health. Jama 278(10) 823-832.

  • Schwartz J. (2015). The Unacknowledged History of John Bowlby's Attachment Theory. British Journal of Psychotherapy 31(2) 251-266.

  • Sciarra D. & Seirup H. (2008). The multidimensionality of school engagement and math achievement among racial groups. Professional School Counseling 11(4) 218-228.

  • Slade A. (1999). Attachment theory and research: Implications for the theory and practice of individual psychotherapy with adults.

  • Stewart E. B. (2007). Individual and school structural effects on African American high school students' academic achievement. The High School Journal 91(2) 16-34.

  • Wiatrowski M. D. Griswold D. B. & Roberts M. K. (1981). Social control theory and delinquency. American sociological review 525-541.

  • Williams J. H. Ayers C. D. Abbott R. D. Hawkins J. D. & Catalano R. F. (1999). Racial differences in risk factors for delinquency and substance use among adolescents. Social Work Research 23(4) 241-256.

  • Zaff J. F. Moore K. A. Papillo A. R. & Williams S. (2003). Implications of extracurricular activity participation during adolescence on positive outcomes. Journal of Adolescent Research 18(6) 599-630.

  • Zurbriggen E. L. Gobin R. L. & Kaehler L. A. (2012). Trauma attachment and intimate relationships. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation 13(2) 127-133.

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 39 39 18
PDF Downloads 15 15 8