Teaching Biology Practical Lessons in Secondary Schools: A Case Study of Five Mzilikazi District Secondary Schools in Bulawayo Metropolitan Province, Zimbabwe

Open access


The study examined how teachers teach Biology practical lessons at Ordinary Level in Mzilikazi District Secondary Schools of Bulawayo Metropolitan Province. Qualitative approach and case study design were adopted. Data was collected using document analysis and semi-structured interviews conducted with purposively selected five Biology teachers, five Heads of Science Department from five schools, and one Science Subject Inspector. Data were thematically analysed. The study revealed that teachers used both teacher-centred and student-centred methods in teaching Biology practical lessons and various factors constrained the teaching of practical lessons. The study concluded that some Biology teachers in selected schools did not conduct practical lessons in line with the Ministry of Primary and Secondary Education expectations. The study recommends that the Ministry of Primary and Secondary Education should continue equipping teachers with knowledge and skills of teaching Biology practical lessons through workshops and other staff development programmes.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Abrahams I. Reiss M. J. & Sharpec R. M. (2013). The Assessment of Practical Work in School Science. Studies in Science Education 49(2) 209-251.

  • Bello S. (2015). Effect of some teacher factors on the conduct of effective biology practical lesson. Global Advanced Research Journal of Educational Research and Review 4(3) 048-054.

  • Capel S Leask M. & Turner T. (2009). Learning to teach in secondary schools. New York: Routlegde Publishers.

  • Dekkers P. (2005). Teaching teachers NOS: Practical examples and classroom experiences. Science Education International 18(30) 193-210.

  • Desmond D. Grieshop J. & Subramaniam A. (2002). Revisiting garden-based learning in basic education. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization

  • Gatsby Foundation (2012). Science for the workplace. London: Gatsby Charitable Foundation.

  • Gorghiu G. Draghicescu L. M. Cristea S. Petrescu A. M. & Gorghiu L. M. (2015). Problem-Based Learning - An Efficient Learning Strategy In The Science Lessons Context. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 191 1865 - 1870.

  • Gott R. & Duggan S. (2009). Problems with the assessment of performance in practical science: which way now? Cambridge Journal of Education 32(2) 183-201.

  • Headlam N. & MacDonald S. (2006). Research Methods Handbook: Introductory guide to research methods for social research. Manchester: CLS Publications.

  • Hofstein A. & Maalmlok-Naaman R. (2007).The laboratory in science education: the state of the art. Chemistry Education Research and Practice 8(2) 105-107.

  • Kalinga E.S. (2008). Development of an interactive e-learning management system (e-lms) for Tanzanian secondary schools. Division of Techno science Studies School of Technoculture Humanities and Planning Blekinge Institute of Technology Sweden.

  • Kibirige I. & Teffo W.L. (2014). Actual and Ideal Assessment Practices in South African Natural Sciences Classrooms. International Journal of Educational Science 6(2) 509-519.

  • Kishor N.(2003). Educational technology. New Delhi: Abhishek publication.

  • Merriam S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco CA: John Wiley & Sons.

  • Millar R. (2009). Analysing practical activities to assess and improve effectiveness: The Practical Activity Analysis Inventory (PAAI). Heslington York: Centre for Innovation and Research in Science Education Department of Educational Studies University of York

  • Millar R. (2010). Practical work. In J. Osborne & J. Dillon (Eds.) Good practice in science teaching: What research has to say (2nd Ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press.

  • Ministry of Education Sport Arts and Culture (2001). Secretary’s Circular Number 6 of 2001. Harare: Government Printers.

  • Motlhabane A. & Dibacha M. (2013). Androgical Approach to Teaching and Learning Practical Work in Science: A Case Study of In-service Training of Teachers. International Journal of Science 5(3) 201-207.

  • Mulkeen A. (2010). Teachers in Anglophone Africa. Issues in teacher supply training and management. New York: The World Bank.

  • Mwenje E. (2012). Mathematics Science and Technology Conference. Bindura: Bindura: University of Science Education.

  • Nasri N.M. Yusof Z.M. Ramasamy S. and Halim L. (2010). Uncovering problems faced by science teacher. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 9 (3) 670-673.

  • Nwagbo C. R. (2006). Effects of two Teaching Methods on the Achievement in and Attitude to Biology of Students of Different Levels of Scientific Literacy. International Journal of Educational Research 45(4) 216-229.

  • Obiekwe C. and Chinwe N. (2012). Effects of the constructivist approach in the teaching of basic ecological concepts in biology. Journal of Science Teachers association of Nigeria 42 (1) 26-35.

  • Opie C. (2004). Doing Educational Research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

  • Oprea C.G. (2013). The enthusiastic teaching - the actor`s art didactically transposed for teachers. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 76 602 - 607.

  • Ormrod J. E. (2000). Educational psychology: Developing learners (3rd Ed.). Upper Saddle River NJ: Merrill-Prentice Hall.

  • Owino O.A. Ahmad O. & Yungungu A. (2014) ‘An investment of factors that influence performance in KSCE biology in selected secondary schools in Nyakach District Kisumu Country. Kenya’ Journal of Education and Human Development 3(2) 957-977.

  • Perry E. (2015). Developing practical work in Ghana. Ghana Science Resource Centres.

  • Polit D. F. & Beck C.T. (2006). Essentials of Nursing Research Appraising Evidence for Nursing Practice. New York: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

  • Rocard M. Cesrmley P. Lenzen D. & Hemmo V. (2007). Science education now: A renewed pedagogy for the future of Europe. Bruxelles: European Comission.

  • Ruffato J.M. (2012). The impact of manipulative models on student understanding of engagement in and confidence in abstract biological processes. Unpublished Master of Science Education Dissertation Montana State University: Bozeman Montana.

  • Ruparanganda F. Rwodzi M. & Mukundu C.K. (2013).Project Approach as an Alternative to Regular Laboratory Practical Work in the Teaching and learning of Biology in Rural Secondary Schools in Zimbabwe. International Journal of Education and Information Studies 3(1) 13-20.

  • Rutto K.P. & Kptingel P. (2014). Challenges facing laboratory practical approach in physics instruction in Kenya District Schools. International School of Achievements in Research and Technology 3 (4) 650-675.

  • Stake R. E. (2010). Qualitative research: studying how things work. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

  • Swain J. Mark M. & Johnson S. (2000). Developments in Science Teachers Attitudes to Aims of Practical Work: Continuity and Chase. Teacher Development 4(2) 425-439.

  • The Science and Technology Human Capital Development Unit UNCST (2012). The quality of science education in Uganda science and technology policy coordination division. Kampala: Uganda National Council for Science and Technology.

  • Tok S. (2010). The problems of teacher candidate’s about teaching skills during teaching practice. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 2 (3) 4142-4146.

  • Tortop H. Uzunkavak M. & Ozek N. (2009). The application of project based learning model supported by prepared according to constructivist approach the field trip to the Solar Energy and its usage areas. Balkan Physics Letters 16(3) 1-8.

  • Tüysüz C. (2010). The Effect of the Virtual Laboratory on Students’ Achievement and Attitude in Chemistry. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences 2(1) 37-53.

  • ZIMSEC (2012). Biology examination report. Harare: Government Printers.

  • ZIMSEC (2014). Biology examination report. Harare: Government Printers.

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1886 1176 83
PDF Downloads 970 722 15