The present research examined the influences of pay for performance programs on employee performance in the Romanian context, by comparing a sample of employees in companies in which such programs are implemented to a sample of employees in organizations in which performance is not used as a criterion in deciding financial rewards. Results show that the work performances of the former, as evaluated by the direct supervisors of each employee, are significantly higher than those of the latter, and that this effect of performance pay is partly mediated by its positive effects on employee perceptions of distributive and procedural justice. Furthermore, results indicate that the individual - level financial incentive systems are more efficient in fostering work performance than the team - level performance pay programs in the Romanian employee sample, and that they also have stronger effects on the two dimensions of organizational justice.
Beer, M., Cannon, M. D., Baron, J. N., Dailey, P. R., Gerhart, B., Heneman, H. G., ... Locke, E. A., 2004. Promise and peril in implementing pay-for-performance. Human Resource Management, 43(1), 3-48. doi:
Chan, S., and Jepsen, D., 2011. Workplace Relationships, Attitudes, and Organizational Justice: A Hospitality Shift Worker Contextual Perspective. Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality & Tourism, 10(2), 150-168. doi:
Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., and Ng, K. Y., 2001. Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 425-445. doi:
Cropanzano, R., and Rupp, D. E., 2003. An overview of organizational justice: Implications for work motivation. In L. W. Porter, G. Bigley and R. M. Steers (Eds.), Motivation and work behavior (7 ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
Deci, E. L., and Ryan, R. M., 1985. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Premium. doi:
DeConinck, J. B., and Stilwell, C. D., 2004. Incorporating organizational justice, role states, pay satisfaction and supervisor satisfaction in a model of turnover intentions. Journal of Business Research, 57(3), 225-231. doi:
Gerhart, B., and Milkovich, G. T., 1992. Employee compensation: Research and practice. In M. D. Dunnette and L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2 ed., pp. 481-569). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc.
Gerhart, B., and Rynes, S. L., 2003. Compensation: Theory, evidence, and strategic implications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Gibson, V. M., 1995. The new employee reward system. Management Review, 84(2), 13-18.
Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Berrone, P., and Franco-Santos, M., 2010. Compensation and organizational performance. Armonk, N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe.
Gupta, N., and Shaw, J. D., 2014. Employee compensation: The neglected area of HRM research. Human Resource Management Review, 24(1), 1-4. doi:
Hein, K., 1996. Raises fail, but incentives save the day. 170, 11.
Heneman, R. L., Ledford, G. E. J., and Gresham, M. T., 2000. The changing nature of work and its effect on compensation design and delivery. In S. L. Rynesand and B. Gerhart (Eds.), Compensations in organizations (pp. 195-240). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Herzberg, F., 1968. One more time: How do you motivate employees? Harvard Business Review, 46(1), 53-62.
Kidwell, R. E., and Bennett, N., 1993. Employee propensity to withhold effort: A conceptual model to intersect three avenues of research. Academy of Management Review, 18, 429-456.
Kohn, A., 1993. Why incentive plans cannot work. Harvard Business Review, 71(5), 54.
Kwon, S., Kim, M., Kang, S., and Kim, M., 2008. Employee Reactions to Gainsharing under Seniority Pay Systems: The Mediating Effect of Distributive, Procedural, and Interactional Justice. Human Resource Management, 47(4), 757-775. doi:
Leventhal, G. S., 1976. Fairness in social relationship. In ThibautJ.W., J. T. Spence and R. C. Carson (Eds.), Contemporary topics in social psychology (pp. 211-239). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
Locke, E. A., Feren, D. B., McCaleb, V. M., Shaw, K. N., and Denny, A. T., 1980. The relative effectiveness of four methods of motivating employee performance. In K. D. Duncan, M. M. Gruenberg and D. Wallis (Eds.), Changes in working life (pp. 363-388). New York: Wiley.
Lum, L., Kervin, J., Clark, K., Reid, F., and Sirola, W., 1998. Explaining nursing turnover intent: Job satisfaction, pay satisfaction, or organizational commitment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19(3), 305-320. doi:
Trevor, C. O., Reilly, G., and Gerhart, B., 2012. Reconsidering pay dispersion's effect on the performance of interdependent work: Reconciling sorting and pay inequality. Academy of Management Journal, 55(3), 585-610. doi:
Vroom, V. H., 1964. Work and motivation. New York: Wiley.
Wallace, C., Edwards, B., Arnold, T., Frazier, L., and Finch, D., 2009. Work stressors, role-based performance, and the moderating influence of organizational support. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 254-262. doi:
Wright, P. M., George, J. M., Farnsworth, R., and McMahan, G. C., 1993. Productivity and extra-role behavior: The effects of goals and incentives on spontaneous helping. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(3), 374-381. doi: