Crisis and Opportunities at the Intersection Between Food, Agri-Bussiness and Health

Open access

Abstract

In the current context, food safety crises often have a direct impact on the health of the European population. Such moments bring chaos and confusion among the population, about food consumption, food systems, the ethics of businesses involved in the agri-food chain, or about guaranteeing their consumers’ rights.

Although the level of consumer information has increased in recent years, there is a need for a uniform approach to all topics of interest to them, from quality, cost, authenticity, maintenance of food safety, to contaminants and fraud.

Choosing a diet generates multiple effects on the quality of human life. Europeans are concerned about how food products are produced and consumed and which are the short and long-term effects, with attention being shifted from providing sufficient food. However, food consumption patterns of European citizens often have negative health consequences, endangering the future and making it necessary to change the way we feed and consume them. From farms to restaurants, we need to redefine the assumed concept of adequate nutrition in the 21st century: sustainable diets from sustainable food systems.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. Gibbs The evolution of One Health: a decade of progress and challenges for the future Vet. Rec. 174 (4) (2014) pp. 85-91 CrossRefView Record in Scopus Google Scholar

  • 2. World Health Organization WHO publishes list of top emerging diseases likely to cause major epidemics. Available from: http://www.who.int/medicines/ebolatreatment/WHO-list-of-top-emerging-diseases/en/ (2015) Google Scholar

  • 3. Whitmee S Haines A Beyrer C Boltz F Capon AG de Souza Dias BF et al. Safeguarding human health in the Anthropocene epoch: report of The Rockefeller Foundation–Lancet Commission on planetary health. Lancet. 386(10007):1973–2028 Google Scholar

  • 4. Centrul European de Prevenire și Control al Bolilor (2017) Rezumatul celor mai recente date privind rezistența la antibiotice în Uniunea Europeană. https://ecdc.europa.eu/sites/portal/files/documents/EAAD%20EARS-Net%20summary.pdf.

  • 5. A se vedea rapoarte precum WRI (2018) Creating a Sustainable Future (Crearea unui viitor durabil). https://www.wri.org/publication/creating-sustainable-food-future; și raportul Comisiei EAT-Lancet privind alimentația sănătoasă bazată pe sisteme alimentare durabile (2019). Food in the Anthropocene https://eatforum.org/initiatives/eat-lancet/.

  • 6. Berners-Lee și alții (2018) Current global food production is sufficient to meet human nutritional needs in 2050 provided there is radical societal adaptation (Producția actuală de alimente la nivel mondial este suficientă pentru asigurarea nevoilor nutriționale umane în 2050 cu condiția să existe o adaptare radicală a societății) Elementa 6 1 52: http://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.310.

  • 7. Ritchie H D Reay & P Higgins (2017). Beyond Calories: A Holistic Assessment of the Global Food System (Dincolo de calorii: O evaluare holistică a sistemului alimentar mondial) Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 2 57 2017: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsufs.2018.00057/full.

  • 8.http://www.interacademies.org/48945/Global-food-systems-are-failing-humanity-and-speedingup-climate-change.

  • 9. https://www.c40.org/.

  • 10.https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniunea_European%C4%83

  • 11. FDE (2018). Raportul anual 2018. https://www.fooddrinkeurope.eu/uploads/publications_documents/FoodDrinkEurope_Annual_Report_INTERACTIVE.pdf.

  • 12. UNEP (2017). TEEB for Agriculture and Food Interim Report (Raportul intermediar al TEEB privind agricultura și alimentația). Nairobi: Programul pentru mediu al ONU. http://teebweb.org/agrifood/home/teeb-foragriculture-food-interim-report/.

  • 13. Sustainable Food Trust (2017). The Hidden Cost of Food (Costurile ascunse ale produselor alimentare). Bristol. http://sustainablefoodtrust.org/wpcontent/uploads/2013/04/HCOF-Report-onlineversion.pdf.

  • 14. Grupul de experți la nivel înalt al Comitetului pentru securitatea alimentară mondială a insistat asupra acestui imperativ în raportul său din septembrie 2017

  • 15. COM(2017) 713 final.

  • 16. ”Promoting healthy and sustainable diets in the EU” adopted by EESC- European Economic and Social Committee on 20/02/2019 Reference: NAT/755-EESC-2018-04568 Rapporteur: Peter Schmidt (Workers - GR II / Germany) Plenary session: 541 - Feb 20 2019 Feb 21 2019 https://www.eesc.europa.eu/en/our-work/opinions-informationreports/opinions/improving-food-supplychain/opinions

  • 17. JO C129 11.4.2018 p. 18.

  • 18. Raportul din 2018 privind situația insecurității alimentare în lume (SOFI): http://www.fao.org/state-of-food-securitynutrition/en/.

  • 19.https://ec.europa.eu/food/sites/food/files/safety/docs/fs_infograph_from-farm-to-fork_en.pdf See also: https://www.eesc.europa.eu/en/our-work/opinions-informationreports/opinions/improving-food-supplychain/opinions

  • 20. http://www.efsa.europa.eu/

  • 21. https://ec.europa.eu/food/safety/rasff_en

  • 22. https://ec.europa.eu/food/animals/traces_en

  • 23. https://ec.europa.eu/food/plant/pesticides_en

  • 24.https://ec.europa.eu/food/plant/plant_health_biosecurity/europhyt/network_en

  • 25. https://www.gainhealth.org/knowledge-centre/food-safety-why-we-need-to-care/

  • 26. Gonzalez-Fischer C T Garnett (2016). Plates pyramids planet: Developments in national healthy and sustainable dietary guidelines: a state of play assessment (Farfurii piramide planetă: evoluții în orientările naționale privind alimentația sănătoasă și durabilă: o evaluare a situației). Roma și Oxford: FAO și Rețeaua de cercetare privind alimentația și clima.

  • 27.http://eticaeconomic.blogspot.com/2015/03/globalizarea-si-etica-in-afaceri.html The phrase “bottom-up” refers to the process by which multinational corporations are forcing Third World countries to compete with each other by allocating their investment funds to those countries that offer the most favorable conditions through low taxes and duties poor environmental regulations and the limited rights of employees.

  • 28.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/4983256_Rolul_eticii_in_deciziile_de_marketing [accessed Apr 07 2019].

  • 29.http://www.madr.ro/docs/agricultura/strategia-agroalimentara-2020-2030.pdf Romanian Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development. ”Strategia pentru dezvoltarea sectorului agroalimentar pe termen mediu și lung orizont 2020-2030”.

  • 30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2011.02.008

  • 31.http://eticaeconomic.blogspot.com/2015/03/aspecte-etice-ale-protectiei.html

  • 32. Tudoriu Felix - “Drepturile consumatorului : o provocare pentru afaceri” 2013 Colectia Business Ed. Libris

  • 33. JO C 303 19.8. 2016 p.64.

  • 34. OMS Biroul regional Europa (2018). Policies to limit marketing of unhealthy foods to children. Copenhaga: OMS Europa http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/disease-prevention/nutrition/news/news/2018/10/policies-to-limit-marketing-of-unhealthy-foods-to-childrenfall-short-of-protecting-their-health-and-rights.

  • 35. Food Active & Children’s Food Campaign (2018). Junk Food Marketing to Children: a study of parents’ perceptions (Reclama la alimente nesănătoase în rândul copiilor: un studiu privind percepțiile părinților). Londra http://www.foodactive.org.uk/wpcontent/uploads/2018/06/Junk-Food-Marketing-to-Children-a-study-of-parents-perceptions.pdf.

  • 36. JO C 303 19.8. 2016 p. 64.

  • 37. JO C 129 11.4.2018 p. 18.

  • 38. https://ec.europa.eu/info/news/commission-adopts-new-rules-labelling-origin-primaryingredients-food-2018-may-28_en

  • 39. A se vedea recenzia în Lang T P Mason (2017). Sustainable diet policy development: implications of multi-criteria and other approaches 2008-2017 Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 2017: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0029665117004074.

  • 40. Consiliul pentru Sănătate din Țările de Jos (2011) Guidelines for a Healthy Diet: the Ecological Perspective. Număr contract: publicația nr. 2011/08E Haga: Consiliul pentru Sănătate din Țările de Jos.

  • 41. Centrul pentru alimentație (2016). Orientările Wheel of Five ale Centrului pentru Nutriție din Țările de Jos (anexa 13 privind aspectele legate de durabilitate). Haga: Centrul pentru alimentație.

  • 42. Administrația Națională pentru Alimentație Agenția pentru Mediu (2008) Environmentally Effective Food Choices: Proposal notified to the EU. Stockholm: Administrația națională pentru alimentație.

  • 43. Consiliul German pentru Dezvoltare Durabilă (RNE) (2014) The Sustainable Shopping Basket – A Guide to Better Shopping. Berlin: Rat für Nachhaltige Entwicklung (Consiliul German pentru Dezvoltare Durabilă) https://www.nachhaltigkeitsrat.de/en/projects/the-sustainable-shopping-basket/.

  • 44.http://ec.europa.eu/research/bioeconomy/index.cfm?pg=policy&lib=food2030.

  • 45.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.10.015.

Search
Journal information
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 128 128 18
PDF Downloads 77 77 8