Theory of the Stereological Analysis of Spheroid Size Distribution – Validation of the Equations

Open access

Abstract

The paper presents validation tests for method which is used for the evaluation of the statistical distribution parameters for 3D particles’ diameters. The tested method, as source data, uses chord sets which are registered from a random cutting plane placed inside a sample space. In the sample space, there were individually generated three sets containing 3D virtual spheres. Each set had different Cumulative Distribution Function (CDF3) of the sphere diameters, namely: constant radius, normal distribution and bimodal distribution as a superposition of two normal distributions. It has been shown that having only a chord set it is possible, by using the tested method, to calculate the mean value of the outer sphere areas. For the sets of data, a chord method generates quite large errors for around 10% of the smallest nodules in the analysed population. With the increase of the nodule radii, the estimation errors decrease. The tested method may be applied to foundry issues e.g. for the estimation of gas pore sizes in castings or for the estimation of nodule graphite sizes in ductile cast iron.

[1] Yin, Y., Tu, Z., Zhou, J. at al. (2017). 3D Quantitative Analysis of Graphite Morphology in Ductile Cast Iron by Xray Microtomography. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A. 48(8), 3794-3803. DOI: 10.1007/s11661-017-4130-x.

[2] Wicksell, S.D. (1925). The Corpuscle Problem: A Mathematical Study of a Biometric Problem. Biometrika. 17(1/2), 84-99.

[3] Więcek, K., Skowronek, K. & Khatemi, B. (2005). Graphite particles size distribution in nodular cast iron. Metallurgy and Foundry Engineering. 31(2), 167-173.

[4] Sheil, E. (1935). Statistische Gefügeuntersuchungen. I. Z. Metallk. 27, 199-208.

[5] Schwartz, H.A. (1934). The Metallographie Determination of the Size Distribution of Temper Carbon Nodules. Metals and Alloys. 5, 139-140.

[6] Saltykov, S.A. (1952). Stereometric Metallurgy, Ind. Ed., Metallurgizdat, Moscow.

[7] Saltykov, S.A. (1967). The determination of the size distribution of particles in an opaque material from the measurement of the size distribution of their sections. Stereology. Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer, 163-173.

[8] Li, T., Shimasaki, S.-i., Taniguchi, Sh. & Narita, Sh. (2016). Reliability of Inclusion Statistisc in Steel Stereological Methods. ISIJ International. 56(9), 1625-1633.

[9] Kong, M., Bhattacharya, R.N., James, C. & Basu, A. (2005). A statistical approach to estimate the 3D size distribution of spheres from 2D size distributions. GSA Bulletin. 117(1/2), 244-249. DOI: 10.1130/B25000.1.

[10] Jakeman, A.J. & Anderssen, R.S. (1975). Abel type integral equations in stereology. I. General discussion. Journal of Microscopy. 105, Pt. 2, 121-133.

[11] Ohser, J. & Sandau, K. (2000). Considerations About the Estimation of the Size Distribution in Wicksell’s Corpuscle Problem. Lecture Notes in Physics. 554, 185-202.

[12] Hielbroner, R. How to derive size distributions of particles from size distributions of sectional areas, https://earth.unibas.ch/micro/support/PDF/grainsize.pdf

[13] Cahn, J.W. & Fullman, R.L. (1956). On the Use of Lineal Analysis for Obtaining Particle-Size Distri-bution Functions in Opaque Samples. Trans. AIME, J. Metals. 206, 610-12.

[14] Lord, C.W. & Willis, T.F. (1951). Calculation of air bubble distribution from results of a Rosiwal traverse of aerated concrete. A.S.T.M. Bull. 177, 177-187.

[15] Spektor, A.G. (1950). Analysis of distribution of spherical particles in non-transparent structures. Zavodsk. Lab., 16, 173-177.

[16] Bockstiegel, G. (1966). The Porosity-Pressure Curve and its Relation to the Pore-Size Distribution in Iron Powder Compacts. in.: Modern Developments in Powder Metallurgy. H.H. Hausner (ed.), Metal Powder Industries Federation and The Metallurgical Society of AIME. pp. 155-187.

[17] Burbelko, A., Gurgul, D. & Wiktor, T. Theory of the Stereological Analysis of Spheroid Size Distribution - on a Theoretical Basis. Archives of Foundry Engineering (under review).

[18] Intel Math Kernel Library, Developer Reference, Revision 0.11, MKL 2017.

Archives of Foundry Engineering

The Journal of Polish Academy of Sciences

Journal Information


CiteScore 2016: 0.42

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.192
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.316

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 128 128 11
PDF Downloads 65 65 10