Competitive Nucleation in Grey Cast Irons

Open access


Cast irons are good examples of materials which are more sensitive to chemical composition and production conditions. In this research to improve casting quality, solidification and nucleation process in grey cast iron was investigate. In particular, attempts have been made to rationalize variation in eutectic cells with nucleation sites and eutectic solidification undercooling. Four castings with different diameter and similar chemical composition and pouring temperature and different inoculant percentage was casted. The cooling curve and maximum and minimum undercooling for each castings was measured. Also optical metallography and image analyzer has been used to determine the average eutectic cells diameter, and linear and surface densities, and volume density was calculated. The results of this research show a competitive behavior between nucleation sites and eutectic undercooling. Higher nucleation sites and higher eutectic undercooling cause higher eutectic cell density. But increasing nucleation sites by introducing inoculants to molten metal, is accompanied with reduction in eutectic undercooling. It means that inoculation and undercooling have opposite effect on each other. So, to achieve maximum cell density, it is necessary to create an optimization between these parameters.

[1] Minkoff,. (1983). The Physical Metallurgy of Cast Irons. New York: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

[2] Elliott, R. (1988). Cast Iron Technology. London: Butterworths and Co. Ltd.

[3] Merchant, H. Toriello, L. & Wallace, J. (1961). Inoculation Influence on Gray Iron Structure at Various Carbon Equivalences. AFS Transactions. 69.

[4] Goettsch, D. (1991). Modelling the Microstructure Development in Gray Iron Castings. Phd Thesis, Uni. Of Illinois.

[5] Ruff, G. & Wallace, J. (1976). Control of Graphite Structure and its Effects on Mechanical Properties of Gray Iron. AFS Trasactions. 84.

[6] Sweden, D. & Wilfered, C. (1976). The nucleation of Graphite From Liquid Iron, A phenomenological Approach. The British Foundrymans. 69.

[7] Turnbull, D. & Fisher, J.C. (1949). Journal of Chemical Physics, 17(71).

[8] Hunt, J. (1954). Steady State Columnar and Equiaxed growth of Dendrites and Eutectics. Mat. Sci and Eng. 65.

[9] Stefanescu, D.M., Upadhya, G. et. al. (1990). Heat Transfer- Solidification Kinetics, Modeling of Solidification of Castings. Metallurgical Transactions A. 21.

[10] Stefanescu, D.M. (1995). Metodologies for Modeling of Solidification Microstructures and Their Capabilities. ISIJ International. 35(6), 637-650.

[11] Stefanescu, D.M. (2009). Science and Engineering of Casting Solidification. Springer.

[12] Elliot, R. (1983). Eutectic Solidification Processing. Butterworths and Co. Ltd. London.

[13] Oldfield, W. (1966). A Quantitative Approach to Casting Solidification: Freezing of Cast Iron. Transactions of ASM. 59.

[14] Thorgrimsson, J.T., Fredriksson, H., Swenson, I.L. (1987). Solidification Process of Flake Cast Iron Castings. In J. Beech and H. Jones Editor. Solidification Processing. Institute of Metals, London.

[15] Basutkar, P., Yew, S. & Lopper. E. “Effect of Certain Additions to the Melt on the As-Cast Dendritic Microstructure of Gray Cast Iron. AFS Tran. 77(1).

[16] Clybe, T. & Kurz, W. (1981). Solute Redistribution during Solidification with Rapid Solid State Diffusion. Met. Tran. A, 12.

[17] Underwood E.F. Editors. (1985). Metals Handbook, Vol. 9, p. 123-124, ASM, 8th Edition.

[18] Glover, G. Bates, C.E. & Monroe, R. (1992). The Relationships Among Carbon Equivalent, Microstructure, and Solidification Characteristics and Their Effects on Strength and Chill in Grey Cast Iron. AFS Trans. 90.

Archives of Foundry Engineering

The Journal of Polish Academy of Sciences

Journal Information

CiteScore 2016: 0.42

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.192
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.316


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 175 175 17
PDF Downloads 85 85 17