Cardiorespiratory and Hemodynamic Effects of Medetomidine or Xylazine with Atropine and Diazepam Premedication for Total Intravenous Anesthesia Induced and Maintained with Propofol/Fentanyl in Dogs Undergoing Surgery
The aim of this study was to compare the effects of different premedication protocols followed by a propofol/fentanyl TIVA on cardio-respiratory and hemodynamic changes in twenty-four dogs randomly divided into two groups (AMD-group: medetomidine, atropine and diazepam; AXD-group: xylazine, atropine and diazepam). Cardiorespiratory variables, acid-base indices, quality of sedation, induction, intubation and recovery were recorded throughout the experiment. Significant changes were observed for the pO2 level, which was increased in the AMDgroup from 90 min. (*P< 0.05) to 120 min. (**P< 0.01) of anesthesia. This can be explained by a reduction of the administration rate of propofol/fentanyl TIVA and oxygenation initiated due to excessively deep anesthesia detected by an anesthetsiologist, leading to improved ventilation and increased pO2. The pCO2 (*P < 0.05) reached more preferable values during the first 30 min. and pH (**P< 0.01) was significantly improved within the first 60 min. in the AXD-group thanks to less depressant effects of xylazine. Within the first 30 min. of anesthesia a significant heart rate difference between the groups was accompanied with significantly higher BP (hypertension) in the AXD-group (10 min. ***P< 0.001, 30 min. **P< 0.01). This points to the possibility of atropine application only in the case of a tendency to bradycardia followed by hypotension. It can be concluded that xylazine is a better option for the premedication of a propofol/ fentanyl TIVA in dogs undergoing a prolonged surgical intervention, in spite of the fact that lower sedation scores were attained. We have detected significantly less adverse cardio-respiratory and hemodynamic effects of xylazine, and a shorter recovery time when compared to medetomidine
1. Trbolová A: Anaesthesia. WSAVA, CEP, Beograd - Serbia and Montenegro, June 3, 2006, 1-29
2. Seliškar A, Rostaher A, Ostrouška M, Butinar J: Intra- and post-operative analgesic effects of carprofein in medetomidine-premedicated dogs undergoing ovariectomy, Acta Veterinaria (Beograd), 2005, 55 (5-6), 435-448.
3. Genter A, Capak H, Lipar M, Samardžija M, Harapin I, Bedrica L, Capak D: Antimicrobial prophylaxis in addition to premedication in gastrointestinal surgery, Acta Veterinaria- Beograd 2014, 64 (1), 149-155.
4. Smith I, White PF, Nathanson M, Gouldson R: Propofol. An update on its clinical use. Anesthesiology 1994, 81:1005-43.
5. Bajwa SJS, Bajwa SK, Kaur J: Comparison of two drug combinations in total intravenous anesthesia: Propofol-ketamine and propofol-fentanyl. Saudi J Anaesth 2010, 4:72-9.
6. Le Guellec C, Lacarelle B, Villard PH, Point H, Catalin J, Durand A: Glucuronidation of propofol in microsomal fractions from various tissues and species including humans: effect of different drugs. Anesth Analg 1995, 81:855-861.
7. Waelders T, Vermoere P, Polis I: Total intravenous anesthesia in dogs. Vlaams Diergen Tijds 2009, 78:160-169.
8. Bednarski R, Grimm K, Harvey R, Lukasik VM, Penn WS, Sargent B, Spelts K: AAHA anesthesia guidelines for dogs and cats. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2011, 47:377-85.
9. Maidden K, Adams VJ, Hill NAT, Leece EA: Alfaxalone induction dose following administration of medetomidine and butorphanol in the dog. Vet Anesth Analg 2010, 37:7-13.
10. Jiménez CP, Mathis A, Mora SS, Brodbelt D, Alibhai H: Evaluation of the quality of the recovery after administration of propofol or alfaxalone for induction of anaesthesia in dogs anaesthetized for magnetic resonance imaging. Vet Anaesth Analg 2012, 39:151-9.
11. Ko JC, Fox SM, Mandsager RE: Comparison of sedative and cardiorespiratory effects of medetomidine and medetomidine-butorphanol combination in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2000, 216:1578-1583.
12. Kuo WC, Keegan RD: Comparative cardiovascular, analgesic, and sedative effects of medetomidine, medetomidine-hydromorphone, and medetomidine-butorphanol in dogs. Am J Vet Res 2004, 65:931-937.
13. Raekallio MR, Räihä MP, Alanen MH, Sarén NM, Tuovio TA: Effects of medetomidine, L-methadone, and their combination on arterial blood gases in dogs. Vet Anaesth Analg 2009, 36:158-61.
14. Yamashita K, Tsubakishita S, Futaok S, Ueda I, Hamaguchi H, Seno T, Katoh S, Izumisawa Y, Kotani T, Muir WW: Cardiovascular effects of medetomidine, detomidine and xylazine in horses. J Vet Med Sci 2000, 62:1025-32.
15. Kürüm B, Pekcan Z, Kalender H, Kumandaş A, Can Mutan O, Elma E: Comparison of propofol-remifentanil and propofol-fentanyl anesthesia during ovariohysterectomy in dogs, Kafras Univ Vet Fak Derg 2013, 19: A33-A40
16. De Mulder PA, Van Kerckhoven RJ, Adriaensen HF, Gillebert TC, De Hert SG: Continuous total intravenous anesthesia, using propofol and fentanyl in an open-thorax rabbit model: evaluation of cardiac contractile function and biochemical assessment. Lab Anim Sci 1997, 47:367-75.
17. Hughes JML, Nolan AM: Total intravenous anesthesia in Greyhounds: Pharmacokinetics of propofol and fentanyl - A preliminary study. Vet Surg 1999, 28:513-524.
18. Tanaka S, Tsuchida H, Sonoda H, Namiki A: Respiratory and cardiovascular effects of fentanyl during propofol-induced sedation under spinal anesthesia. J Anesth 1998, 12:171-174.
19. Andreoni V, Hughes JML: Propofol and fentanyl infusions in dogs of various breeds undergoing surgery. Vet Anaesth Analg 2009, 36:523-531.
20. Dzikiti BT, Stegmann FG, Dzikiti LN, Hellebrekers LJ: Total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) with propofol-fentanyl and propofol-midazolam combinations in spontaneouslybreathing goats. Vet Anaesth Analg 2010, 37:519-25.
21. Cullen LK, Reynoldson JA: Xylazine or medetomidine premedication before propofol anaesthesia. Vet Rec 1993, 132:378-383.