Influence of aerobic and anaerobic conditions on the growth and metabolism of selected strains of Lactobacillus plantarum

Open access

Abstract

Three wild strains of Lactobacillus plantarum were investigated for their growth and ability to produce lactic acid, acetic acid and ethanol under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. They were tested at three different temperatures (30 °C, 37 °C and 45 °C). The growth of lactobacilli was studied by measuring optical density (OD) at λ = 600 nm and pH value at the following times. With increasing temperature difference of cell yield was observed. The final cell yield under aerobic conditions was higher. Organic acids and ethanol were analysed using an HPLC RID method. Formation of lactic acid (as the major metabolite) was the slowest during cultivation at 30 °C, but the final amount of lactic acid showed the highest values. Concentrations of metabolites produced by lactobacilli after 48th hours of cultivation were: 9.18-11.48 g.dm-3 (lactic acid), 0.84-1.65 g.dm-3 (acetic acid) and 2.51-4.03 g.dm-3 (ethanol). No significant differences (p = 0.05) were found in production of lactic acid and ethanol by different bacterial strains under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Statistically significant differences (p = 0.05) were observed in production of acetic acid by 2L2 under aerobic and anaerobic conditions and for production of ethanol under anaerobic conditions by strains 1L5 and 2L2.

Axelsson L (2004) In: Salminen S, von Wright A, Ouwehand A (Ed) Lactic Acid Bacteria, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York - Basel.

Carminati D, Giraffa G, Quiberoni A, Binetti A, Suarez V, Reinheimer J (2010) In: Mozzi F, Raya RR, Vignolo GM (Ed) Biotechnology of Lactic Acid Bacteria: Novel Applications, Wiley-Blackwell, Ames-Singapore. ISBN 978-0-8138-1583-1.

De Vries MC, Vaughan EE, Kleerebezem M, De Vos W (2006) International Dairy Journal 16: 1018-1028.

Freitas C, Pintado AE, Pintado ME, Malcata FX (1999) European Food Research and Technology 209: 434-438.

Fu W, Mathews AP (1999) Biochemical Engineering Journal 3: 163-170.

Gupta S, Abu-Ghannam N, Scannell AGM (2011) Food and Bioproducts Processing 89: 346-355.

Hudaček J, Zalan Z, Štětina J, Chumchalova J, Halasz A (2006) In: Proceedings “Mleko a syry 2006”, 234-239. ISBN 80-7080-620-6, Praha.

Kask S, Adamberg K, Orłowski A, Vogensen FK, Moller PL, Ardo Y, Paalme T (2003) Food Research International 36: 1037-1046.

Ljungh A, Wadstrom T (2006) Current Issues in Intestinal Microbiology 7: 73-89.

Tejero-Sarinena S, Barlow J, Costabile A, Gibson GR, Rowland I (2012) Anaerobe 18: 530-538.

Vaughan EE, Heilig HG, Ben-Amor K, de Vos WM (2005) FEMS Microbiology Reviews 29: 477-490.

Zago M, Fornasari ME, Carminati D, Bums P, Suarez V, Vinderola G, Reinheimer J, Giraffa G (2011) Food Microbiology 28: 1033-1040.

Acta Chimica Slovaca

The Journal of Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava

Journal Information

Cited By

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 137 137 26
PDF Downloads 81 81 18