Phenomena, Biometrics and Canopy Behavior of Prickly Comfrey (Symphytum Asperum Lep., Boraginaceae) in a Long-Term Experiment

Open access

Annual and interannual phenomena and canopy behavior of prickly comfrey (Symphytum asperum Lep.) were studied in a 10-year experiment with 25 measurement sessions during the growing season. The results confirm the importance of long-term experiments in studying plant phenomena, biometrics and behavior. Prickly comfrey produced a green canopy each year and growth started very early in spring. Maximum plant height was less than 160 cm. Annual phenomena (growth initiation, seedling phase, flower phase, seed phase, senescent phase), interannual phenomena (initiation and youth, reproduction, new generation formation, plant death) and two population cycles (colonization and expansion) were measured. The duration of annual development up to canopy death can be expressed as x+2x+3x+2x, where x is initial growth. The genetic structure and activity of prickly comfrey promotes generative development of the species. Its age can be measured over a single and several vegetation generations. The ability to change the angle of vertical stem growth after 9 weeks can be considered a functional behavior of prickly comfrey and part of its life strategy. The differences between the organs in the upper and lower parts are very considerable and should be taken into account in morphological descriptions of this species. The upper and lower stems and leaves showed differential growth. Both stem and leaves were densely setose. Old leaves were 3.8 times longer, 4 times broader and 2.4 times thicker than young leaves. Hairs were on average 3 times longer on old than on young leaves. Flowers had contact with pollinators making relatively long visits to them.

ADLER PB, and HILLERISLAMBERS J. 2008. The influence of climate and species composition of the population dynamics of ten prairie forbs. Ecology 89: 3049-3060.

ANISZEWSKI T. 1988. Phenological study on trees, bushes and arable peat land. Agricultural Research Center, Jokioinen, Finland. Bulletin 2/88: 1-125. [In Finnish].

ANISZEWSKI T. 2000. Phenotypic parameters of elecampane (Inula helenium) in eastern Finland. Aquilo Series Botanica 38: 13-28.

ANISZEWSKI T. 2004. Legume species that have breeding potential for NE Europe. Science of Legumes 6: 256-265.

ANISZEWSKI T. 2010. Canopy behavior of three milkvetch (Astragalus) species in acclimation to a new habitat. Acta Biologica Cracoviensia Series Botanica 52/1: 45-54.

ANISZEWSKI T, DROZDOV SN, KHOLOPTSEVA ES, and MIHKIEV AI. 1996. Botanical characteristics and phenological development of Galega orientalis Lam. in the primeval forest zone of eastern Fennoscandia. Aquilo Series Botanica 36: 21-26.

ANISZEWSKI T, KUPARI MH, and LEINONEN AJ. 2001. Seed number, seed size and seed diversity in Washington lupine (Lupinus polyphyllus Lindl.). Annals of Botany 87: 77-81.

ANISZEWSKI T, and SIMOJOKI P. 1984. Quantity and vigour of weed seeds in some ARC rotation experimental areas. Review and analysis of soil samples from three ARC research stations. Agricultural Research Centre. Jokioinen, Finland. Bulletin 22/84: 1-38. [In Finnish].

BARBAKADZE VV, MULKIDZHANYAN KG, MERLANI MI, GOGILASHVILI LM, AMIRANASHVILI LSA, and SHABURISHVILI EK. 2011. Extraction, composition and the antioxidant and anticomplement activities of high molecular weight fractions from leaves of Symphytum asperum and S. caucasicum. Pharmaceutical Chemistry Journal 44:11: 604-607.

BUSWELL JM, MOLES AT, and HARTLEY S. 2011. Is rapid evolution common in introduced plant species? Journal of Ecology 29: 214-224.

DUDLEY JW. 2007. From Means to QTL: The Illinois long-term selection experiment as a case study in quantitative genetics. Crop Science 47 (S3): S20-S31.

FINNOFF D, and TSCHIRHART J. 2009. Plant competition and exclusion with optimizing individuals. Journal of Theoretical Biology 261(2): 227-237.

GADELLA TWJ, and KLIPHUIS E. 1975. Cytotaxonomic studies in Genus Symphytum. 7. Some hybrids between Symphytum asperum Lepech and Symphytum officinale L. in Denmark. Proceedings of the Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen Series C - Biological and Medical Sciences 78:182-188.

GADELLA TWJ, and KLIPHUIS E. 1978. Cytotaxonomic studies in Genus Symphytum. 8. Chromosome numbers and classification of 10 European species. Proceedings of the Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen Series C - Biological and Medical Sciences 81: 162-172.

GADELLA TWJ, KLIPHUIS E, and HUIZING HJ. 1983. Cyto- and chemotaxonomical studies in the sections Officinalia and Coerulea of the genus Symphytum. Botanica Helvetica 93: 169-192.

GARZON CP, and KEIJZER F. 2011. Adaptive behavior, rootbrains, and minimal cognition. Adaptive Behavior 19:155-171.

HE GM, ELLING AA, DENG XW, MERCHANT SS, BRIGGS WR, and ORT D. 2011. The epigene and plant development. Annual Review of Plant Biology 62: 411-435.

JAARSMA TA, LOMANNS E, GADELLA TWJ, and MALINGRE TM. 1989. Chemotaxonomy of the Symphytum officinale agg. (Boraginaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 167: 113-127.

JAARSMA TA, LOHMANNS E, HENDRIKS H, GADELLA TWJ, and MALINGRE TM. 1990. Chemo- and karyotaxonomic studies on some rhizomatous species of the genus Symphytum (Boraginaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 169: 31-39.

MOSSBERG B, and STENBERG L. 2005. Grand Guide to Northern Plants, 928. Tammi, Helsinki. [In Finnish].

OSMOND CB, ANANYEV G, BERRY J, LANGDOM C, KOLBERG Z, LIN G, MONSON R, NICHOL CJ, RASCHER U, SCHURR U, SMITH S, and YAKIR D. 2004. Changing the way we think about global change research: scaling up in experimental ecosystem science. Global Change Biology 10: 393-407.

OZCAN T. 2010. Differentiation of Symphytum species using RAPD and seed fatty acid patterns. Natural Product Communications 5: 587-596.

PHILLIPPE N, CROZAT R, LENSKI RE, and SCHNEIDER D. 2007. Evolution of global regulatory networks during a longterm experiment with Escherichia coli. BioEssays 29: 846-860.

ROZEN DE, and LENSKI RE. 2000. Long-term experimental evolution in Escherichia coli. VIII. Dynamics of balanced polymorphism. American Naturalist 155: 24-35.

SCHURR U, WALTER A, and RASCHER U. 2006. Functional dynamics of plant growth and photosynthesis - from steady-state to dynamics. Plant Cell and Environment 29: 340-352.

TUTIN TG. 1956. The genus Symphytum in Britain. Watsonia 3: 280-281.

TUTIN TG, HEYWOOD VH, BURGES NA, MOORE DM, VALENTINE DH, WALTERS DH, and WEBB DA. 1972. Flora Europea, vol. 3, 104-105. University Press, Cambridge.

WADE AE. 1958. The history of Symphytum asperum Lepech. and S. × uplandicum Nyman in Britain. Watsonia 4: 117-118.

Acta Biologica Cracoviensia s. Botanica

The Journal of Polish Academy of Sciences

Journal Information

IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.491
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.787

CiteScore 2016: 0.51

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.242
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.264

Ministry of Science and Higher Education: 20 points


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 93 93 13
PDF Downloads 34 34 6