Documentary film as historical narrative

Open access


The submitted study describes the documentary film as a historical narrative that carries within it problems documented by historians such as Paul Veyne and Hayden White. It argues on behalf of the thesis that a documentary film in itself does not classify historical clues according to historical truth but according to a selected purpose (e.g. despite aesthetic conventions or in the case of a narrative film - according to the story). The study refutes the argument of Noël Carroll, who deals with the popularizing documentary film - specifically, connecting scientific “truth” with the tropological character of a documentary film narrative can create at best an approximate picture of a historical event.

Carroll N. 1996. “Nonfiction Film and Postmodernist Skepticism.” In: Bordwell, D. and N. Carroll (eds.). Post-theory: Reconstructing film studies. Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin Press, pp. 283-306.

Ferenčuhová, M. 2009. Odložený čas. Bratislava: Slovenský filmový ústav, Vysoká škola múzických umení.

Nichols B. 2011. Úvod do dokumentárního filmu. Praha: Akademie múzických umění.

Renov M. 1993. Theorizing Documentary. London: Routledge.

Veyne P. 2010. Jak se píšou dějiny. Červený Kostelec: Pavel Mervart.

White H. 2011. Metahistorie. Brno: Host.

Ars Aeterna

Literary Studies and Humanity

Journal Information

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.102


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 251 251 19
PDF Downloads 113 113 2